IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2022-02-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indonesia s Energy Demand Projection Until 2060

Author

Listed:
  • Edwaren Liun

    (Center for Research of Nuclear Energy System, Indonesia.)

  • Suparman Suparman

    (Center for Research of Nuclear Energy System, Indonesia.)

  • Sriyana Sriyana

    (Center for Research of Nuclear Energy System, Indonesia)

  • Dharu Dewi

    (Center for Research of Nuclear Energy System, Indonesia.)

  • Jupiter Sitorus Pane

    (Center for Research of Reactor Technology and Nuclear Safety, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.)

Abstract

Changes that occur along with the times have consequences for increasing the need for various resources, especially energy. In Indonesia, various changes that occur will also affect the pattern of energy consumption, both qualitatively and quantitatively. This paper describes various aspects related to change and projects over the next 40 years the pattern and quantitative aspects of energy demand in Indonesia. This study is based on historical data by applying related parameters that influence one another. The methodology used is the application of a modeling system with the software 'Model for Analysis of Energy Demand (MAED)'. The results obtained are a description of Indonesia's energy demand projections until 2060 per sector and the form or type of energy needed. The projection results show that in the next 40 years the total energy demand will increase from 195.0 Mtoe in 2020 to 556.5 Mtoe in 2060. From this amount there is a percentage change in the need for each type of energy between the early years of 2020 to the end of 2060. Motor fuel changed from 28% to 34%, while electricity changed from 24% in 2020 to 28% in 2060. In the demand sector, the share of demand decreased in households from 29% in 2020 to 20% in 2060. While other sectors experienced an increase in share in various values. Transportation rose from 19% to 22%, ACM from 8% to 9%, manufacturing remained 34%, while services rose from 10 to 15%. During study period there two important parameters decrease, those are population growth and energy intensity.

Suggested Citation

  • Edwaren Liun & Suparman Suparman & Sriyana Sriyana & Dharu Dewi & Jupiter Sitorus Pane, 2022. "Indonesia s Energy Demand Projection Until 2060," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 467-473, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2022-02-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/12794/6712
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/12794
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rudolph, Christian, 2016. "How may incentives for electric cars affect purchase decisions?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 113-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna & Michalski, Rafał & Kott, Marek & Skowrońska-Szmer, Anna & Kott, Joanna, 2022. "Consumer preferences towards alternative fuel vehicles. Results from the conjoint analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    3. Raj Kumar & Yuan Chun & Tanjia Binte Zafar & Nora Ahmed Mothafar, 2019. "Building Sustainable Green Environment by Reducing Traffic Jam: The Role of Sharing Economy as Ride-sharing An Overview of Dhaka Metropolitan City," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 3(6), pages 164-173.
    4. Kim, Ga-Eun & Kim, Ju-Hee & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2019. "South Korean consumers’ preferences for eco-friendly gasoline sedans: Results from a choice experiment survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-7.
    5. Rodrigues Teixeira, Ana Carolina & Machado, Pedro Gerber & Borges, Raquel Rocha & Felipe Brito, Thiago Luis & Moutinho dos Santos, Edmilson & Mouette, Dominique, 2021. "The use of liquefied natural gas as an alternative fuel in freight transport – Evidence from a driver's point of view," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Falcão, Eduardo Aparecido Moreira & Teixeira, Ana Carolina Rodrigues & Sodré, José Ricardo, 2017. "Analysis of CO2 emissions and techno-economic feasibility of an electric commercial vehicle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 297-307.
    7. Loría, Luis Enrique & Watson, Verity & Kiso, Takahiko & Phimister, Euan, 2019. "Investigating users' preferences for Low Emission Buses: Experiences from Europe's largest hydrogen bus fleet," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Park, Soyeong & Maeng, Kyuho & Shin, Jungwoo, 2023. "Efficient subsidy distribution for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles based on demand segmentation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    9. Rostad Sæther, Simen, 2022. "Mobility at the crossroads – Electric mobility policy and charging infrastructure lessons from across Europe," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 144-159.
    10. Mirzadeh Phirouzabadi, Amir & Savage, David & Blackmore, Karen & Juniper, James, 2020. "The evolution of dynamic interactions between the knowledge development of powertrain systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-16.
    11. Zhuge, Chengxiang & Wei, Binru & Shao, Chunfu & Shan, Yuli & Dong, Chunjiao, 2020. "The role of the license plate lottery policy in the adoption of Electric Vehicles: A case study of Beijing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Gabriela D. Oliveira & Luis C. Dias, 2019. "Influence of Demographics on Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Review of Choice Modelling Studies and a Study in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-33, January.
    13. Yujin Beak & Kayoung Kim & Kyuho Maeng & Youngsang Cho, 2020. "Is the environment‐friendly factor attractive to customers when purchasing electric vehicles? Evidence from South Korea," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 996-1006, March.
    14. Flávia Mendes de Almeida Collaço & Ana Carolina Rodrigues Teixeira & Pedro Gerber Machado & Raquel Rocha Borges & Thiago Luis Felipe Brito & Dominique Mouette, 2022. "Road Freight Transport Literature and the Achievements of the Sustainable Development Goals—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Teixeira, Ana Carolina Rodrigues & Machado, Pedro Gerber & Borges, Raquel Rocha & Mouette, Dominique, 2020. "Public policies to implement alternative fuels in the road transport sector," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 345-361.
    16. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Rafał Michalski & Marek Kott & Anna Skowrońska-Szmer & Joanna Kott, 2021. "Consumer preferences towards alternative fuel vehicles. Results from the conjoint analysis," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/21/02, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    17. Sousa, Nuno & Almeida, Arminda & Coutinho-Rodrigues, João, 2020. "A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 18-32.
    18. Jiali Yu & Peng Yang & Kai Zhang & Faping Wang & Lixin Miao, 2018. "Evaluating the Effect of Policies and the Development of Charging Infrastructure on Electric Vehicle Diffusion in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    19. Hackbarth, André & Madlener, Reinhard, 2018. "Combined Vehicle Type and Fuel Type Choices of Private Households: An Empirical Analysis for Germany," FCN Working Papers 17/2018, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), revised May 2019.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    population growth; GDP growth; energy intensity; technological developments; energy demand;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • Q47 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy Forecasting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2022-02-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.