IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2020-05-46.html

Evaluation of the Gas Industry Company s Competitiveness in the Domestic Market

Author

Listed:
  • Natalya S. Shcherbakova

    (Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia,)

  • Yulia A. Nazarova

    (Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia,)

  • Natalia A. Navrotskaia

    (Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Nataliya V. Bondarchuk

    (Financial University, Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia,)

  • Alla V. Vavilina

    (Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia,)

Abstract

Quantification of a company s competitiveness in the gas industry is necessary in order to find the possibility for that entity to maintain or increase its competitive advantage in the respective markets for goods and services. Therefore, the market opportunities of an economic entity are the result of the competitive advantages creation, the form, quantity, and quality of which determine the scope, nature and success of the entity's activity in its market segment and the possibility of its expanding to new markets. The need to assess competitiveness is confirmed by the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Russian companies activities in the oil and gas industry. The authors applied a dynamic method for assessing the competitiveness of a leading company in the Russian gas market. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that it is advisable to use this method, because it makes it possible to identify the main factors that influenced the level of competitiveness of the investigated object. These factors, therefore, allows us to determine the main reserves for increasing the competitiveness of the analyzed enterprise. The practical application of this study finding is possible in the field of corporate governance and strategic planning for gas companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalya S. Shcherbakova & Yulia A. Nazarova & Natalia A. Navrotskaia & Nataliya V. Bondarchuk & Alla V. Vavilina, 2020. "Evaluation of the Gas Industry Company s Competitiveness in the Domestic Market," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 401-408.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2020-05-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/9627/5299
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/9627/5299
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julia S. P. Loe, 2019. "“But it is our duty!” Exploring Gazprom’s reluctance to Russian gas sector reform," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 63-76, January.
    2. Catherine Locatelli, 2014. "The Russian gas industry: challenges to the 'Gazprom model'?," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 53-66, March.
    3. Olga Ergunova & Vladislav Lizunkov & Viktor Blaginin & Ekaterina Politsinskaya & Olga I. Shaykina, 2018. "Formation of the Price Mechanism for Energy Resources in Russia and the Countries of the European Union," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(1), pages 122-127.
    4. Sylvia Maxfield, 2008. "Reconciling Corporate Citizenship and Competitive Strategy: Insights from Economic Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 367-377, June.
    5. Marc J. Melitz, 2003. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(6), pages 1695-1725, November.
    6. Ivan A. Kapitonov & Irina V. Zhukovskaya & Rustem R. Khusaenov & Valentin A. Monakhov, 2018. "Competitiveness and Competitive Advantages of Enterprises in the Energy Sector," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 300-305.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalya S. Shcherbakova & Yulia A. Nazarova & Olga S. Kirichenko & Oleg A. Gorunov & Andrey V. Dubrovsky, 2020. "Evaluation of Gas Industry Competitiveness in the Foreign Market," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 272-279.
    2. Elhanan Helpman, 2010. "Labor Market Frictions as a Source of Comparative Advantage, with Implications for Unemployment and Inequality," NBER Working Papers 15764, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Patricia Kotnik & Eva Hagsten, 2018. "ICT use as a determinant of export activity in manufacturing and service firms: Multi-country evidence," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 103-128.
    4. Acar, Mustafa & Afyonoglu, Burcu & Kus, Savas & Vural, Bengisu, 2007. "Turkey’s Agricultural Integration with the EU: Quantifying the Implications," Conference papers 331657, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Chen, Natalie & Juvenal, Luciana, 2022. "Markups, quality, and trade costs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Joachim Wagner, 2012. "Exports, R&D and productivity: a test of the Bustos-model with German enterprise data," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(3), pages 1942-1948.
    7. Yuegang Song & Songlin Jin & Zhenhui Li, 2022. "Venture Capital and Chinese Firms’ Technological Innovation Capability: Effective Evaluation and Mechanism Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Benkovskis, Konstantins & Wörz, Julia, 2018. "What drives the market share changes? Price versus non-price factors," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 9-29.
    9. Kalantzis, Fotios & Niczyporuk, Hanna, 2021. "Can European businesses achieve productivity gains from investments in energy efficiency?," EIB Working Papers 2021/07, European Investment Bank (EIB).
    10. Dmitri Kirpichev & Enrique Moral-Benito, 2018. "The costs of trade protectionism: evidence from Spanish firms and non-tariff measures," Working Papers 1814, Banco de España.
    11. Tovar, Jorge, 2012. "Consumers’ Welfare and Trade Liberalization: Evidence from the Car Industry in Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 808-820.
    12. Wang, Xu & Zhang, Xiaobo & Xie, Zhuan & Huang, Yiping, 2016. "Roads to innovation: Firm-level evidence from China," IFPRI discussion papers 1542, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Dennis, Allen & Shepherd, Ben, 2007. "Trade costs, barriers to entry, and export diversification in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4368, The World Bank.
    14. Sourafel Girma & Yundan Gong & Holger Görg & Zhihong Yu, 2009. "Can Production Subsidies Explain China's Export Performance? Evidence from Firm‐level Data," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 111(4), pages 863-891, December.
    15. Masayuki MORIKAWA, 2015. "Service Trade and Productivity: Firm-level evidence from Japan," Discussion papers 15030, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    16. Masashige Hamano & Francesco Pappadà, 2023. "Exchange Rate Policy and Firm Heterogeneity," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 71(3), pages 759-790, September.
    17. Stephen J. Redding & David E. Weinstein, 2017. "Aggregating from Micro to Macro Patterns of Trade," NBER Working Papers 24051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Cheptea, Angela & Emlinger, Charlotte & Latouche, Karine, 2014. "Do exporting firms benefit from retail internationalization? Evidence from France," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182706, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Gilles Saint-Paul, 2014. "How Darwinian should an economy be?," PSE Working Papers hal-01095450, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
    • L95 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Gas Utilities; Pipelines; Water Utilities
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2020-05-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.