IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Fragen der künftigen Entwicklung des europäischen Handelssystems für Emissionsrechte

Listed author(s):
  • Jürgen Hogrefe
  • Jörg Jasper
  • Uwe Knickrehm
  • Felix Würtenberger
Registered author(s):

    The paper gives a brief overview of probable further developments of the EU-ETS. At first, we discuss scenarios for the auspices of the Post-Kyoto-Regime providing a general framework of the EU-ETS in the period after 2012. We find that Europe is likely to still have an ambitious CO2-regime after 2012, provided that the global post-2012 process does not cease to exist and that there will be no "face-saving" regulation. CDM will become increasingly important. Auctioning of emission allowances is likely to be introduced after 2012. The fuel independent benchmark is likely to become subject of public discussion again. Public discussion on carbon market intervention by the government will continue, although one should be sceptical with respect to its results. In general, one must not ignore the fact that deficiencies in carbon market performance which could be observed during the first year after its installation in the beginning of 2005 were mostly due to mistakes in market design and to a lack of experience of market participants in using the instrument. Der Beitrag gibt einen bewertenden Überblick über die mögliche Weiterentwicklung des europäischen Handelssystems für Emissionsrechte. Dazu wird zunächst der allgemeine Rahmen dargestellt, in den das europäische System eingebettet ist, wobei denkbare Szenarien für das internationale Klimaschutzregime nach Auslaufen des Kyoto-Protokolls 2012 diskutiert werden. Im Anschluss werden Fragen zu wesentlichen Ausgestaltungsmerkmalen des europäischen Handelssystems nach 2012 analysiert. Es zeigt sich, dass Europa vermutlich weiterhin eines der anspruchsvollsten CO2-Regulierungsregimes weltweit haben wird. Der Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) wird in diesem Kontext eine stark wachsende Bedeutung erlangen. Das Thema Auktionierung wird nach 2012 zusätzliches Gewicht erhalten. Die Frage nach einem brennstoffunabhängigen Benchmark wird dann vermutlich erneut öffentlich diskutiert. Auch die Diskussion um ergänzende Markteingriffe des Staates (safety valves; carbon hedge) wird weitergehen, wenngleich diese oftmals mit Skepsis zu betrachten sind. Auch sollte die Diskussion nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen, dass die teilweise problematische Performance des CO2-Marktes vor allem auf Fehler im Marktdesign, aber auch auf fehlende Erfahrungen mit dem Instrument zurückzuführen ist.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its journal Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Volume (Year): 76 (2007)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 126-139

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:76-1-10
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin

    Phone: xx49-30-89789-0
    Fax: xx49-30-89789-200
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. ZhongXiang Zhang, 2003. "Open Trade with the U.S. without Compromising Canada’s Ability to Comply with its Kyoto Target," Working Papers 2003.68, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Georg Müller-Fürstenberger & Gunter Stephan, 2005. "Intensity Targeting or Emission CAPS: Non-Cooperative Climate Change Policies and Technological Change," Diskussionsschriften dp0502, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    3. Cameron Hepburn & Michael Grubb & Karsten Neuhoff & Felix Matthes & Maximilien Tse, 2006. "Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 137-160, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:76-1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.