IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v70y2017i07p55-59.html

Die Brexit-Verhandlungen – Inhalt und Konsequenzen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die EU

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanie Gäbler
  • Manuela Krause
  • Antonia Kremheller
  • Luisa Lorenz
  • Niklas Potrafke
  • Luisa Dörr

Abstract

Im Rahmen des Ökonomenpanels von ifo und FAZ im Februar 2017 wurden Professoren für Volkswirtschaftslehre an deutschen Universitäten zu ihren Erwartungen für die anstehenden Brexit-Verhandlungen sowie im Hinblick auf die zukünftige Handelspolitik der EU und dem Vereinigten Königreich befragt. Die befragten Teilnehmer sind mehrheitlich der Ansicht, dass die EU in Zukunft vornehmlich im Rahmen eines bilateralen Vertrags mit dem Vereinigten Königreich zusammenarbeiten wird, würden sich allerdings eher eine Mitgliedschaft des Landes im Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum als zukünftiges Modell wünschen. Zugleich erwarten die Ökonomen mehrheitlich, dass sich die Handelspolitik der EU in Zukunft protektionistischer entwickeln wird.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanie Gäbler & Manuela Krause & Antonia Kremheller & Luisa Lorenz & Niklas Potrafke & Luisa Dörr, 2017. "Die Brexit-Verhandlungen – Inhalt und Konsequenzen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die EU," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(07), pages 55-59, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:70:y:2017:i:07:p:55-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2017-07-gaebler-etal-faz-brexit-2017-04-13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dhingra, Swati & Ottaviano, Gianmarco I. P. & Sampson, Thomas & Reenen, John Van, 2016. "The consequences of Brexit for UK trade and living standards," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 66144, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Ottaviano, Gianmarco & Pessoa, João Paulo & Sampson, Thomas & Van Reenen, John, 2014. "The costs and benefits of leaving the EU," CFS Working Paper Series 472, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ursula F Ott & Pervez N Ghauri, 2019. "Brexit negotiations: From negotiation space to agreement zones," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(1), pages 137-149, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hatzigeorgiou, Andreas & Lodefalk, Magnus, 2016. "The Brexit Trade Disruption Revisited," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 17(01), pages 1-18.
    2. Kamil Kotlinski, 2018. "The economic consequences of leaving European Union by Great Britain," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 17(2), pages 157-167, June.
    3. Halmai, Péter, 2020. "A dezintegráció gazdaságtana. A brexit esete [The economics of disintegration. The case of Brexit]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 837-877.
    4. International Monetary Fund, 2016. "United Kingdom: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2016/169, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Giammetti, Raffaele, 2019. "Tariffs, Domestic Import Substitution and Trade Diversion in Input-Output Production Networks: how to deal with Brexit," MPRA Paper 93229, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Agata Wierzbowska & Massimiliano Porto, 2024. "Did Brexiteers consider the business cycle of the UK trading partners?," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Ansgar Belke & Daniel Gros, 2017. "The Economic Impact of Brexit: Evidence from Modelling Free Trade Agreements," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 45(3), pages 317-331, September.
    8. Pitsoulis, Athanassios & Schwuchow, Soeren, 2018. "Though this be madness: A game-theoretic perspective on the Brexit negotiations," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181635, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Bruno, Randolph Luca & Campos, Nauro & Estrin, Saul & Tian, Meng, 2016. "Foreign direct investment and the relationship betweenthe United Kingdom and the European Union," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 69025, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Bashir, Usman & Zebende, Gilney Figueira & Yu, Yugang & Hussain, Muntazir & Ali, Ahmed & Abbas, Ghulam, 2019. "Differential market reactions to pre and post Brexit referendum," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 151-158.
    11. Barlow, Pepita, 2020. "Global disparities in health-systems financing: A cross-national analysis of the impact of tariff reductions and state capacity on public health expenditure in 65 low- and middle-income countries, 1996–2015," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104107, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Pierre Boulanger & George Philippidis, 2015. "The End of a Romance? A Note on the Quantitative Impacts of a ‘Brexit’ from the EU," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 832-842, September.
    13. Achten, Sandra & Lessmann, Christian, 2020. "Spatial inequality, geography and economic activity," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    14. Crafts, Nicholas, 2016. "The Growth Effects of EU Membership for the UK: a Review of the Evidence," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 280, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    15. Portuese, Aurelien, . "Towards a Meta Cost-benefit Analysis: The Case of Brexit," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 19(01).
    16. Elena BANICA & Valentina VASILE, 2017. "Romanian foreign trade after Brexit - impact, main challenges and limits," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 45(2(54)), pages 63-86, December.
    17. Escaith, Hubert, 2018. "Mapping the UK domestic and global value chains from a Brexit perspective," MPRA Paper 87824, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Caterina Moschieri & Daniel J. Blake, 2019. "The organizational implications of Brexit," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Ayşen SİVRİKAYA & Serdar ONGAN, 2019. "BREXIT and the J-Curve Hypothesis for the UK: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 27(40).
    20. Arthur Korus & Kaan Celebi, 2019. "The impact of Brexit news on British pound exchange rates," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 161-192, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F33 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:70:y:2017:i:07:p:55-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.