IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v59y2008i1p237-262n13.html

Regulierung und Wettbewerbsrecht in liberalisierten Netzindustrien aus institutionenökonomischer Perspektive / Regulation and Competition Law in Liberalised Network Industries as Seen from a New Institutional Economics Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Haucap Justus
  • Uhde André

Abstract

The most crucial task for the liberalisation of network industries is the control of the incumbent’s and former monopolist’s market power. In theory, this can be effected either through ex ante regulation by a special agency, which focuses on a limited number of industries, such as the Federal Network Agency in Germany, or through ex-post control by general competition authorities such as Germany’s Federal Cartel Office. For the German electricity market, the Federal Cartel Office was in charge of controlling market power until 2005, when the Federal Network Agency as established as the regulator in charge of controlling network prices. For telecommunications and airports the debate over “ex-ante regulation vs. ex-post control” is not over yet, however. This paper shows that such a simple dichotomisation neither captures the complexity of the problem nor the diversity of possible institutional arrangements. Any recommendation on the institutional design of the regulatory framework should depend on how competition has developed in the past what can be expected for the future. We develop elements for a further differentiation of regulatory measures, based on the so-called 3- criteria-test applied in European telecommunications markets.The German Telecommunications Act (TKG) also contains reasonable approaches. Sector-specific ex post control of market power and ex post regulation, as envisaged by the TKG, have the advantage of countervailing well-known tendencies of overregulation. However, the consistency of competition law across sectors may suffer, and the regulator may be more prone to regulatory capture than a competition authority. Therefore, we argue that any sector-specific ex post control should be accompanied by a sunset clause to guarantee the transition into general competition law. Ex post regulation can, however, facilitate a faster exit from sector-specific regulation by climbing down the so-called ladder of remedies.

Suggested Citation

  • Haucap Justus & Uhde André, 2008. "Regulierung und Wettbewerbsrecht in liberalisierten Netzindustrien aus institutionenökonomischer Perspektive / Regulation and Competition Law in Liberalised Network Industries as Seen from a New Institutional Economics Perspective," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 59(1), pages 237-262, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:59:y:2008:i:1:p:237-262:n:13
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2008-0113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2008-0113
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2008-0113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justus Haucap & Joern kruse, 2003. "Ex-Ante-Regulierung oder Ex-Post-Aufsicht fuer netzgebundene Industrien?," Working Paper 25/2003, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg.
    2. Dewenter Ralf & Haucap Justus, 2004. "Die Liberalisierung der Telekommunikationsbranche in Deutschland: Bisherige Erfolge und weiterer Handlungsbedarf," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 53(3), pages 374-396, December.
    3. Barro, Robert J., 1986. "Reputation in a model of monetary policy with incomplete information," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 3-20, January.
    4. William M. Dugger, 1996. "The Mechanisms of Governance," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 1212-1216, December.
    5. Knieps, Günter, 1999. "Zur Regulierung monopolistischer Bottlenecks," Discussion Papers 62, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    6. Ingo Vogelsang, 2003. "The German Telecommunications Reform – Where did it come from, Where is it, and Where is it Going?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(3), pages 313-340, August.
    7. George J. Stigler, 1971. "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring.
    8. R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), 1989. "Handbook of Industrial Organization," Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.
    9. Knieps, Günter, 2003. "Der Wettbewerb und seine Grenzen: Netzgebundene Leistungen aus ökonomischer Sicht," Discussion Papers 93, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    10. Eickhof, Norbert & Holzer, Verena Leïla, 2006. "Das neue Energiewirtschaftsgesetz: Regelungen für einen erweiterten Zielkatalog," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 86(4), pages 268-276.
    11. Ralf Dewenter & Justus Haucap, 2004. "Die Liberalisierung der Telekommunikationsbranche in Deutschland," Working Paper 27/2004, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg.
    12. Kenneth E. Train, 1991. "Optimal Regulation: The Economic Theory of Natural Monopoly," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200848, December.
    13. Kydland, Finn E & Prescott, Edward C, 1977. "Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(3), pages 473-491, June.
    14. Panzar, John C., 1989. "Technological determinants of firm and industry structure," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 3-59, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Budzinski, Oliver & Eckert, Sandra, 2015. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 93, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haucap, Justus & Lange, Mirjam R. J. & Wey, Christian, 2012. "Nemo Omnibus Placet: Exzessive Regulierung und staatliche Willkür," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 27, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    2. Lindemann, Henrik, 2015. "Regulatory Objectives and the Intensity of Unbundling in Electricity Markets," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-544, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    3. Moser, Peter, 1999. "The impact of legislative institutions on public policy: a survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-33, March.
    4. Alesina, Alberto & Stella, Andrea, 2010. "The Politics of Monetary Policy," Handbook of Monetary Economics, in: Benjamin M. Friedman & Michael Woodford (ed.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 18, pages 1001-1054, Elsevier.
    5. J.A. den Hertog, 2010. "Review of economic theories of regulation," Working Papers 10-18, Utrecht School of Economics.
    6. Andersson, Thomas, 1991. "Approaches to Partnerships Causing Asymmetries Between Japan and the West," Working Paper Series 320, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised Feb 1992.
    7. Emanuela Todeva & Ruslan Rakhmatullin, 2016. "Industry Global Value Chains, Connectivity and Regional Smart Specialisation in Europe. An Overview of Theoretical Approaches and Mapping Methodologies," JRC Research Reports JRC102801, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Peter S. Yoo, 1998. "The FOMC in 1997: a real conundrum," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Sep, pages 27-40.
    9. Haucap, Justus, 2017. "The rule of law and the emergence of market exchange: A new institutional economic perspective," DICE Discussion Papers 276, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    10. Boschen, John F. & Weise, Charles L., 2004. "Does the dynamic time consistency model of inflation explain cross-country differences in inflations dynamics?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 735-759, September.
    11. Çetin, Tamer & Yasin Eryigit, Kadir, 2013. "The economic effects of government regulation: Evidence from the New York taxicab market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 169-177.
    12. Juan Ayuso Huertas, 1991. "Los efectos del anuncio de un objetivo de inflación," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 15(3), pages 627-644, September.
    13. Jensen, Christian, 2013. "The gains from short-term commitments," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 14-23.
    14. Bassetto, Marco, 2019. "Forward guidance: Communication, commitment, or both?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 69-86.
    15. Schaumburg, Ernst & Tambalotti, Andrea, 2007. "An investigation of the gains from commitment in monetary policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 302-324, March.
    16. Spiller, Pablo T., 2013. "Transaction cost regulation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 232-242.
    17. Blaeschke, Frédéric & Haug, Peter, 2014. "Does Intermunicipal Cooperation Increase Efficiency? Evidence from the Hessian Wastewater Sector," IWH Discussion Papers 11/2014, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    18. Marc Quintyn, 2009. "Independent agencies: more than a cheap copy of independent central banks?," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 267-295, September.
    19. Polemis, Michael L., 2016. "New evidence on the impact of structural reforms on electricity sector performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 420-431.
    20. Ball, Laurence, 1995. "Time-consistent policy and persistent changes in inflation," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 329-350, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:59:y:2008:i:1:p:237-262:n:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.