IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boh/actaub/v19y2016i2p41-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination QAD in Audited and Unaudited Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Miroslava Vlčková

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

Abstract

Based on QAD (quality of accounting data) information it is possible to determine how the company is able to manage its economic activities. The basic element is the level of QAD perceived by users of accounting information. This article describes using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to get an overview to the quality of accounting information. Then there is used statistical methods T-test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to set the differences between QAD in audited and unaudited companies. The first step is to define the various criteria which adversely affect the quality of accounting data and then their assignment to groups according to the context. Subsequently, on the basis of Saaty's method determine the weights of the criteria in each group and then by using the AHP method determine their importance. Then the quality of accounting data in 71 companies is determined and the differences between accounting data quality of audited companies and accounting data quality of unaudited companies are detected.

Suggested Citation

  • Miroslava Vlčková, 2016. "Determination QAD in Audited and Unaudited Companies," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 19(2), pages 41-49.
    • Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:41-49
    DOI: 10.1515/acta-2016-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/doi/10.1515/acta-2016-0009.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/doi/10.1515/acta-2016-0009.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/acta-2016-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Easton, George S & Jarrell, Sherry L, 1998. "The Effects of Total Quality Management on Corporate Performance: An Empirical Investigation," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 71(2), pages 253-307, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    2. Surendra Gera & Wulong Gu, 2004. "The Effect of Organizational Innovation and Information and Communications Technology on Firm Performance," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 9, pages 37-51, Fall.
    3. Charles J. Corbett & María J. Montes-Sancho & David A. Kirsch, 2005. "The Financial Impact of ISO 9000 Certification in the United States: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1046-1059, July.
    4. Ana Kundid Novokmet & Andrijana Rogošiæ, 2017. "Long-Term Financial Effects of Quality Management System Maturity Based on ISO 9001 Principles," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(S11), pages 1003-1003.
    5. David I. Levine & Michael W. Toffel, 2010. "Quality Management and Job Quality: How the ISO 9001 Standard for Quality Management Systems Affects Employees and Employers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 978-996, June.
    6. Mihail Busu & Alexandra Catalina Nedelcu, 2017. "Sustainability and Economic Performance of the Companies in the Renewable Energy Sector in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Yaser Mansour Almansour, 2015. "The Impact of Total Quality Management Components on Firms Performance," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 6(8), pages 384-394.
    8. Kevin B. Hendricks & Vinod R. Singhal, 2001. "The Long-Run Stock Price Performance of Firms with Effective TQM Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 359-368, March.
    9. Nicolau, Juan Luis & Sellers, Ricardo, 2002. "The stock market's reaction to quality certification: Empirical evidence from Spain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(3), pages 632-641, November.
    10. Sadikoglu, Esin & Zehir, Cemal, 2010. "Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 13-26, September.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3185 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Dedi Purbowo & Sunaryo & Nur Prima Waluyowati, 2022. "The effect of leadership on operational performance:The mediating role of quality improvement," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(1), pages 108-116, January.
    13. Lilian DE MENEZES & Garry GELADE & Stephen WOOD, 2008. "A Longitudinal Study of the Latent Class Clusters of Modern Management Practices and their Association with Organizational Performance in British Manufacturing," EcoMod2008 23800028, EcoMod.
    14. David McKenzie & Christopher Woodruff, 2017. "Business Practices in Small Firms in Developing Countries," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2967-2981, September.
    15. Bloom, Nicholas & Van Reenen, John, 2011. "Human Resource Management and Productivity," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 19, pages 1697-1767, Elsevier.
    16. Edward Conlon & Sarv Devaraj & Khalil F. Matta, 2001. "The Relationship Between Initial Quality Perceptions and Maintenance Behavior: The Case of the Automotive Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(9), pages 1191-1202, September.
    17. Hung, Richard Yu Yuan & Lien, Bella Ya-Hui & Yang, Baiyin & Wu, Chi-Min & Kuo, Yu-Ming, 2011. "Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 213-225, April.
    18. Pérez-Méndez, José Antonio & Machado-Cabezas, Ángel, 2015. "Relationship between management information systems and corporate performance," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 32-43.
    19. Peter Cappelli & David Neumark, 2001. "Do “High-Performance†Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(4), pages 737-775, July.
    20. Lanzenauer, Christoph Haehling von & Huesmann, Monika, 2002. "Der Ausbreitungsprozess des Managementinstrumentes TQM," Discussion Papers 2002/22, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    21. Rishi Domun, 2016. "Path towards Business Excellence the Mauritian Experience," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 148-148, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Analytic Hierarchy Process; Saaty's Method; Criteria Quality of Accounting Data; Audited and Unaudited Companies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:41-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efjcucz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.