IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rgscpp/v14y2022i4p699-717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial spillover effects of corruption in Asian countries: Spatial econometric approach

Author

Listed:
  • Masoud Khodapanah
  • Zahra Dehghan Shabani
  • Mohammad Hadi Akbarzadeh
  • Mahboubeh Shojaeian

Abstract

Despite its vital importance in economic analysis and policy recommendation, the spatial effects of corruption as well as its contagiousness were less addressed in the literature of corruption. Hence, the purpose of this study was to investigate the spatial effects of corruption in Asian countries during the period from 2012 to 2019 using dynamic spatial autoregressive (SAR) models. According to the results, the existence of positive spatial spillover effects of corruption in Asian countries was confirmed; meaning that the increase of the corruption indicators in neighbouring countries had a positive effect on the corruption in one country. Moreover, the level of corruption in the previous periods had a positive and significant effect on the current level of corruption in the studied countries. On the other hand, the existence of a U‐inverted relationship between GDP and corruption was confirmed in Asian countries. Finally, the results of the study indicated that the increase of the government size in Asian countries increases the level of corruption. A pesar de su importancia vital en el análisis económico y las recomendaciones sobre políticas, los efectos espaciales de la corrupción, así como su contagio, se han venido abordando menos en la literatura sobre la corrupción. Por ello, el propósito de este estudio fue investigar los efectos espaciales de la corrupción en los países asiáticos durante el período de 2012 a 2019 utilizando modelos espaciales dinámicos autorregresivos (SAR, por sus siglas en inglés). Según los resultados, se confirmó la existencia de efectos espaciales positivos del spillover de la corrupción en los países asiáticos, lo que significa que el aumento de los indicadores de corrupción en los países vecinos tuvo un efecto positivo en la corrupción de un país. Además, el nivel de corrupción en los períodos anteriores tuvo un efecto positivo y significativo en el nivel actual de corrupción en los países estudiados. Por otro lado, se pudo confirmar la existencia de una relación en forma de U invertida entre el PIB y la corrupción en los países asiáticos. Por último, los resultados del estudio indicaron que el aumento del tamaño del gobierno en los países asiáticos aumenta el nivel de corrupción. 経済分析と政策提言において腐敗は極めて重要であるにもかかわらず、腐敗の空間的影響とその伝染性は、研究対象とさることが少ない。そこで、本研究では、2012~2019年までのアジア諸国における腐敗の空間的影響を、動的な空間自己回帰(spatial autoregressive:SAR)モデルを用いて検討した。結果から、アジア諸国における腐敗の空間的波及効果の存在が確認され、近隣諸国の腐敗指標の増加がある国の腐敗にプラスの影響を与えていた。さらに、過去の期間における腐敗のレベルは、調査対象国における現在の腐敗のレベルにプラスの大きな影響を与えた。一方、アジア諸国では、GDPと腐敗とが逆U字型の関係にあることが確認された。最後に、研究の結果から、アジア諸国における政府規模の拡大が腐敗のレベルを増加させることが示された。

Suggested Citation

  • Masoud Khodapanah & Zahra Dehghan Shabani & Mohammad Hadi Akbarzadeh & Mahboubeh Shojaeian, 2022. "Spatial spillover effects of corruption in Asian countries: Spatial econometric approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(4), pages 699-717, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:699-717
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12368
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rsp3.12368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gen-Fu Feng & Bo Sui & Min-Yi Dong & Chun-xia Jiang & Chun-Ping Chang, 2018. "Border is better than distance? Contagious corruption in one belt one road economies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1909-1928, July.
    2. Pushan Dutt, 2009. "Trade protection and bureaucratic corruption: an empirical investigation," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 42(1), pages 155-183, February.
    3. Jie Bai & Seema Jayachandran, 2013. "Does Economic Growth Reduce Corruption? Theory and Evidence from Vietnam," Working Papers id:5507, eSocialSciences.
    4. Dong, Bin & Torgler, Benno, 2012. "Corruption and social interaction: Evidence from China," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 932-947.
    5. Joakim Westerlund & Jörg Breitung, 2013. "Lessons from a Decade of IPS and LLC," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5-6), pages 547-591, August.
    6. Swamy, Anand & Knack, Stephen & Lee, Young & Azfar, Omar, 2001. "Gender and corruption," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 25-55, February.
    7. Kaddour Hadri, 2000. "Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 3(2), pages 148-161.
    8. Kaddour Hadri & Yao Rao, 2008. "Panel Stationarity Test with Structural Breaks," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 70(2), pages 245-269, April.
    9. Andrew Hodge & Sriram Shankar & D. S. Prasada Rao & Alan Duhs, 2011. "Exploring the Links Between Corruption and Growth," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 474-490, August.
    10. Turhan Kaymak & Eralp Bektas, 2015. "Corruption in Emerging Markets: A Multidimensional Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 785-805, December.
    11. Joseph G. Attila, 2008. "Is corruption contagious? An econometric analysis," Post-Print hal-00329950, HAL.
    12. Yann Bramoull? & Rachel Kranton & Martin D'Amours, 2014. "Strategic Interaction and Networks," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(3), pages 898-930, March.
    13. La Porta, Rafael, et al, 1997. "Trust in Large Organizations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 333-338, May.
    14. Antonio Andres & Carlyn Ramlogan-Dobson, 2011. "Is Corruption Really Bad for Inequality? Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(7), pages 959-976.
    15. Im, Kyung So & Pesaran, M. Hashem & Shin, Yongcheol, 2003. "Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 53-74, July.
    16. Keisuke Okada & Sovannroeun Samreth, 2017. "Corruption and natural resource rents: evidence from quantile regression," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(20), pages 1490-1493, November.
    17. repec:bla:obuest:v:61:y:1999:i:0:p:631-52 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Nurudeen Abu & Marcin Waldemar Staniewski, 2019. "Determinants of corruption in Nigeria: evidence from various estimation techniques," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 3058-3082, January.
    19. Rafael Di Tella & Alberto Ades, 1999. "Rents, Competition, and Corruption," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(4), pages 982-993, September.
    20. Mr. Carlos A Leite & Jens Weidmann, 1999. "Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption, and Economic Growth," IMF Working Papers 1999/085, International Monetary Fund.
    21. Becker, Sascha O. & Egger, Peter H. & Seidel, Tobias, 2009. "Common political culture: Evidence on regional corruption contagion," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 300-310, September.
    22. Borsky, Stefan & Kalkschmied, Katja, 2019. "Corruption in space: A closer look at the world's subnations," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 400-422.
    23. López-Valcárcel, Beatriz G. & Jiménez, Juan Luis & Perdiguero, Jordi, 2017. "Danger: Local corruption is contagious!," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 790-808.
    24. Pushan Dutt, 2009. "Trade protection and bureaucratic corruption: an empirical investigation," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 155-183, February.
    25. Ortega, David L. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M. & Delbecq, Benoit A., 2010. "Primary Determinants And The Spatial Distribution Of Corruption," Working papers 101395, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    26. Matthias Busse & Steffen Gröning, 2013. "The resource curse revisited: governance and natural resources," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 1-20, January.
    27. Goel, Rajeev K. & Nelson, Michael A., 2007. "Are corrupt acts contagious?: Evidence from the United States," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 839-850.
    28. Christan RA Setyobudi & Dyah Setyaningrum, 2019. "E-government and corruption perception index: a cross-country study," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 23(1), pages 11-20.
    29. G. S. Maddala & Shaowen Wu, 1999. "A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 61(S1), pages 631-652, November.
    30. Paolo Mauro, 1995. "Corruption and Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(3), pages 681-712.
    31. Miguel Márquez & Javier Salinas‐Jiménez & Ma. del Mar Salinas‐Jiménez, 2011. "Exploring differences in corruption: the role of neighboring countries," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 11-19.
    32. Şerife Özşahin & Gülbahar Üçler, 2017. "The Consequences of Corruption on Inflation in Developing Countries: Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Tests," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-15, December.
    33. Levin, Andrew & Lin, Chien-Fu & James Chu, Chia-Shang, 2002. "Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 1-24, May.
    34. Kotera, Go & Okada, Keisuke & Samreth, Sovannroeun, 2012. "Government size, democracy, and corruption: An empirical investigation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 2340-2348.
    35. Christan RA Setyobudi & Dyah Setyaningrum, 2019. "E-Government And Corruption Perception Index: A Cross-Country Study," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 23(1), pages 11-20, Juni.
    36. Bologna, Jamie, 2016. "The effect of informal employment and corruption on income levels in Brazil," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 657-695.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Graziella Bonanno & Lucia Errico & Nadia Fiorino & Roberto Ricciuti, 2024. "The Impact of Government Size on Corruption: A Meta-Regression Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 10956, CESifo.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugen Dimant & Guglielmo Tosato, 2018. "Causes And Effects Of Corruption: What Has Past Decade'S Empirical Research Taught Us? A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 335-356, April.
    2. Hermann Pythagore Pierre Donfouet & P. Wilner Jeanty & Eric Malin, 2013. "A Spatial Dynamic Panel Analysis of Corruption," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201324, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
    3. Bo Sui & Gen-Fu Feng & Chun-Ping Chang, 2018. "The pioneer evidence of contagious corruption," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 945-968, March.
    4. Goel, Rajeev K. & Saunoris, James W., 2022. "Corrupt thy neighbor? New evidence of corruption contagion from bordering nations," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 635-652.
    5. Campo Robledo, Jacobo, 2011. "Sostenibilidad fiscal: una aproximación con datos panel para 8 países Latinoaméricanos [Fiscal sustainability: A data panel approach for eight Latin American countries]," MPRA Paper 33091, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Dehghan Shabani, Zahra, 2020. "Do renewable energy production spillovers matter in the EU?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 786-796.
    7. Jamie Bologna, 2017. "Contagious corruption, informal employment, and income: evidence from Brazilian municipalities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(1), pages 67-118, January.
    8. Yao Rao & Kaddour Hadri & Ruijun Bu, 2010. "Testing For Stationarity In Heterogeneous Panel Data In The Case Of Model Misspecification," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 209-225, July.
    9. Omid Ranjbar & Xiao-Lin Li & Tsangyao Chang & Chien-Chiang Lee, 2015. "Stability of long-run growth in East Asian countries: New evidence from panel stationarity test with structural breaks," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 570-589, June.
    10. Mark Holmes & Jesús Otero & Theodore Panagiotidis, 2010. "Are EU budget deficits stationary?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 767-778, June.
    11. Kaddour Hadri & Eiji Kurozumi, 2008. "A Simple Panel Stationarity Test in the Presence of Cross-Sectional Dependence," Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series gd08-016, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    12. Jacobo Alberto Campo Robledo, 2012. "Impacto De Las Patentes Sobre El Crecimiento Económico: Un Modelo Panel Cointegrado [Impact of Patents on Economic Growth: A Cointegrated Panel Data Model]," Working Papers hal-00744361, HAL.
    13. Dong, Bin & Torgler, Benno, 2012. "Corruption and social interaction: Evidence from China," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 932-947.
    14. Mark Holmes & Jesús Otero & Theodore Panagiotidis, 2012. "PPP in OECD Countries: An Analysis of Real Exchange Rate Stationarity, Cross-Sectional Dependency and Structural Breaks," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 767-783, November.
    15. Eva Kotlánová & Igor Kotlán, 2012. "Vliv institucionálního prostředí na velikost korupce: empirická analýza [The Influence of the Institutional Factors on the Corruption: The Empirical Analysis]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(2), pages 167-186.
    16. Krambia-Kapardis Maria & Stylianou Ioanna & Demetriou Salomi, 2022. "Nonlinear nexus between corruption and tourism arrivals: a global analysis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1997-2024, October.
    17. João Martins & Linda Veiga & Bruno Fernandes, 2021. "Does electronic government deter corruption? Evidence from across the world," NIPE Working Papers 02/2021, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    18. Ruba A. Aljarallah & Andrew Angus, 2020. "Dilemma of Natural Resource Abundance: A Case Study of Kuwait," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    19. Apergis, Nicholas & Dincer, Oguzhan C. & Payne, James E., 2012. "Live free or bribe: On the causal dynamics between economic freedom and corruption in U.S. states," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 215-226.
    20. Jacobo Campo Robledo & Juan Pablo Herrera Saavedra, 2016. "Patentes y crecimiento económico: ¿innovación de residentes o no residentes?," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, vol. 76, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:699-717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1757-7802 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.