IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v28y2024i1p71-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A possible mechanism for partial crowding‐out of R&D subsidies in developing countries

Author

Listed:
  • María Engracia Rochina Barrachina
  • Jorge Antonio Rodríguez Moreno

Abstract

We analyze the effectiveness of R&D subsidies on firms' R&D efforts in a developing country like Ecuador. We use the National Survey of Innovation Activities. Methodologically, we employ a structural framework that considers simultaneity and selection issues. Our results indicate that subsidies have an extensive margin effect, as they encourage firms to carry out R&D activities, and an intensive margin effect, as they increase firms' total innovation effort. However, this is compatible with partial crowding‐out of private efforts by public funds. One possible mechanism to explain this result is that, in developing countries with less developed capital markets, firms with financial constraints may divert part of the subsidy to invest in fixed capital. We find some support for this hypothesis, as the most financially constrained firms both explain the crowding‐out effect and increase their fixed capital investment when receiving a subsidy. For other firms, we observe crowding‐in, and their fixed capital investment remains insensitive to the subsidy.

Suggested Citation

  • María Engracia Rochina Barrachina & Jorge Antonio Rodríguez Moreno, 2024. "A possible mechanism for partial crowding‐out of R&D subsidies in developing countries," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 71-96, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:28:y:2024:i:1:p:71-96
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.13038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.13038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:28:y:2024:i:1:p:71-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.