IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v78y2025i2p346-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Gender Stereotypes and Student Well‐Being in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai Chu
  • Xiangquan Zeng
  • Klaus F. Zimmermann

Abstract

A prominent gender stereotype claims that “boys are better at learning mathematics than girls.” Confronted with such a parental attitude, how does this affect the well‐being of 11‐ to 18‐year‐old students in Chinese middle schools? Although well‐being has often been shown to be not much gender‐diverse, the intergenerational consequences of such stereotypes are not well studied. Expecting too much from boys and too little from girls might damage self‐esteem among school kids. Using large survey data covering districts all over China reveals that one‐quarter of the parents agree with the math stereotype. It is shown that this has strong detrimental consequences for the offspring's well‐being. Students are strongly more depressed, feeling blue, unhappy, not enjoying life, and sad with no male–female differences, whereas parental education does not matter for this transfer. Various robustness tests including other than math stereotypes and an IV analysis confirm the findings. Moderating such effects, which is in line with societal objectives in many countries, not only supports gender equality but also strengthens the mental health of children.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai Chu & Xiangquan Zeng & Klaus F. Zimmermann, 2025. "Parental Gender Stereotypes and Student Well‐Being in China," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(2), pages 346-366, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:78:y:2025:i:2:p:346-366
    DOI: 10.1111/kykl.12421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12421
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/kykl.12421?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:78:y:2025:i:2:p:346-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.