IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v57y2026i4p274-286.html

The Spatial Anatomy of Working at Home: Concepts, Measures and Types of Spaces Used

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Felstead
  • Rhys Davies
  • Duncan Gallie
  • Francis Green
  • Golo Henseke
  • Ying Zhou

Abstract

This article provides a spatial analysis of working at home. It makes distinctions according to the extent to which the boundaries of work and home spatially overlap. Using this conceptual lens, it deploys data from Britain′s Skills and Employment Survey to track the trends and patterns of homeworking and hybrid working over the last two decades. The article also examines the type of home spaces used. It identifies the characteristics of those who use a home office as opposed to other spaces, such as the kitchen or the lounge, where unpaid domestic tasks are carried out. The results show that, first, the relatively privileged are more likely to work at home. Second, those spending more time working at home, living in larger and better‐maintained homes, and men rather than women are more likely to have a home office. Furthermore, gendered access to a home office persists even among dual‐earner households.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Felstead & Rhys Davies & Duncan Gallie & Francis Green & Golo Henseke & Ying Zhou, 2026. "The Spatial Anatomy of Working at Home: Concepts, Measures and Types of Spaces Used," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 274-286, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:4:p:274-286
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.70032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70032
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.70032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2023. "Working from Home Around the Globe: 2023 Report," EconPol Policy Brief 53, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    2. Julia Darby & Stuart McIntyre & Graeme Roy, 2022. "What can analysis of 47 million job advertisements tell us about how opportunities for homeworking are evolving in the United Kingdom?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 281-302, July.
    3. Ana Moreira & Hugo Farias, 2022. "Gendered Spaces at Home Feminine and Masculine Traits in Domestic Interiors," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 10(6), pages 91104-91104, November.
    4. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2022. "Working from Home Around the World," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 53(2 (Fall)), pages 281-360.
    5. Lila Skountridaki & W. Victoria Lee & Lilinaz Rouhani, 2024. "Missing voices: Office space discontent as a driving force in employee hybrid work preferences," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 54-77, January.
    6. Julia Darby & Stuart McIntyre & Graeme Roy, 2022. "What can analysis of 49 million job advertisements tell us about how opportunities for homeworking are evolving in the UK," Working Papers 22-02, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rhys Davies & Alan Felstead, 2023. "Is job quality better or worse? Insights from quiz data collected before and after the pandemic," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 203-222, May.
    2. Philipp Brüggemann & Luis F. Martinez & Koen Pauwels, 2025. "Theoretical perspectives and conceptual framework for online grocery shopping: Adapting to environmental circumstances and influencing internal factors," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2271-2307, June.
    3. Shackleton, J. R., 2025. "Liberating the labour market: How reforming employment regulation can boost British growth," IEA Discussion Papers 139, Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).
    4. Osorio, María Lucila & Madero, Sergio, 2025. "Explaining Gen Z’s desire for hybrid work in corporate, family, and entrepreneurial settings," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 83-93.
    5. Clive Trusson & Gwen K-W Chen & John Bridger, 2024. "‘When the Daily Commute Stops’: A Long-Distance Commuter’s Reflections on Commuting and Telecommuting across the COVID-19 Pandemic," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 279-290, February.
    6. Gaetano Basso & Davide Dottori & Sara Formai, 2025. "Working from home and labour productivity: firm-level evidence," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1508, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. Anna Michalkiewicz & Marzena Syper-Jedrzejak, 2023. "Dealing With Pressure and Stress as a Social Competence of a Manager Developed in Distance Education," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 119-130.
    8. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2025. "Working from Home in 2025: Five Key Facts," EconPol Policy Brief 73, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    9. Philippe Askenazy & Ugo Di Nallo & Ismaël Ramajo & Conrad Thiounn, 2025. "Teleworking in the French private sector: a lasting but heterogenous shift shaped by collective agreements (2019- 2024)," Working Papers hal-05291266, HAL.
    10. Francesca Foliano & Rebecca Riley & Lynsey Brown, 2026. "The Changing Nature of Work: What Can We Learn from Time Use Diaries?," NBER Chapters, in: The Changing Nature of Work, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Anna Matysiak & Agnieszka Kasperska & Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska, 2025. "Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Work from Home on Careers in the Post-Covid Context," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1103-1126, October.
    12. Tony Dobbins & Stewart Johnstone & Marta Kahancová & J. Ryan Lamare & Adrian Wilkinson, 2023. "Comparative impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on work and employment—Why industrial relations institutions matter," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 115-125, April.
    13. Byeonghwa Jeong & Karen Chapple, 2025. "Does class matter? Understanding differential pandemic recovery via a building typology," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(9), pages 2139-2152, November.
    14. Ganguli, Ina & Haidar, Jamal Ibrahim & Khwaja, Asim Ijaz & Stemper, Samuel & Zafar, Basit, 2024. "Economic shocks and skill acquisition: Evidence from a national online learning platform at the onset of COVID-19," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Kerspien, Jacob & Madsen, Jakob B. & Strulik, Holger, 2026. "Capital composition and the decline of the labor share: Why buildings matter," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Vincenzo Alfano & Ilaria Mariotti & Nunzia Nappo & Gaetano Vecchione, 2024. "Work-life balance during the COVID-19 pandemic. A European perspective," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 51(4), pages 1041-1065, December.
    17. Jan Bietenbeck & Natalie Irmert & Therese Nilsson, 2026. "Individualism and working from home," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 64(2), pages 491-507, April.
    18. Behrens, Kristian & Kichko, Sergei & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 2024. "Working from home: Too much of a good thing?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. Dobbins, Tony & Johnstone, Stewart & Kahancová, Marta & Lamare, J. Ryan & Wilkinson, Adrian, 2023. "Comparative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on work and employment—Why industrial relations institutions matter," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125303, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Jean-Marc Bourgeon & José de Sousa & Alexis Noir-Luhalwe, 2022. "Social Distancing and Risk Taking: Evidence from a Team Game Show [Distanciation sociale et prise de risque : Les résultats d'un jeu d'équipe]," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03792423, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:4:p:274-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.