IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ieadps/321866.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Liberating the labour market: How reforming employment regulation can boost British growth

Author

Listed:
  • Shackleton, J. R.

Abstract

A free competitive market offers wide opportunities for individuals and businesses and is compatible with the framework of classical liberalism. It is also the best environment for boosting productivity and economic growth. * Theere are uncompetitive elements within the UK's private sector which may distort market outcomes, but the growth of employment regulation in the last fifty years is a major contributor to our slow economic growth and stagnant real wages. * Government interventions in the labour market are ostensibly intended to redress market failures and promote social justice, but they may not always serve these purposes. * The Employment Rights Bill going through Parliament is likely to exacerbate the problems of the UK economy and will do little to promote growth. * Serious deregulation of the labour market is not currently on the political agenda but may eventually become a necessity. There are, however, considerable barriers to reform. * Some key areas for practical reform are discussed, such as discrimination and equal pay, education and training, unfair dismissal, and occupational regulation. * A more radical, 'minimalist' approach to regulation is also possible, though this would require a major shift of opinion among both policymakers and the general public.

Suggested Citation

  • Shackleton, J. R., 2025. "Liberating the labour market: How reforming employment regulation can boost British growth," IEA Discussion Papers 139, Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ieadps:321866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/321866/1/1930426909.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2023. "Working from Home Around the Globe: 2023 Report," EconPol Policy Brief 53, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    2. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2022. "Working from Home Around the World," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 53(2 (Fall)), pages 281-360.
    3. Clemens Fuest & Andreas Peichl & Sebastian Siegloch, 2018. "Do Higher Corporate Taxes Reduce Wages? Micro Evidence from Germany," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(2), pages 393-418, February.
    4. Cahuc, Pierre & Malherbet, Franck & Prat, Julien, 2019. "The Detrimental Effect of Job Protection on Employment: Evidence from France," IZA Discussion Papers 12384, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Astrid Kunze, 2022. "Parental leave and maternal labor supply," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 279-279, June.
    6. Peter Ainsworth & Tom McKenzie & Al Stroyny, 2016. "Incentive Effects in Higher Education: an Improved Funding Model for Universities," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 239-257, October.
    7. Gruber, Jonathan, 1994. "The Incidence of Mandated Maternity Benefits," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 622-641, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behrens, Kristian & Kichko, Sergei & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 2024. "Working from home: Too much of a good thing?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Philipp Brüggemann & Luis F. Martinez & Koen Pauwels, 2025. "Theoretical perspectives and conceptual framework for online grocery shopping: Adapting to environmental circumstances and influencing internal factors," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2271-2307, June.
    3. Askenazy, Philippe & Di Nallo, Ugo & Ramajo, Ismaël & Thiounn, Conrad, 2025. "Teleworking in the French Private Sector: A Lasting but Heterogenous Shift Shaped by Collective Agreements (2019–2024)," IZA Discussion Papers 17874, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Daiji KAWAGUCHI & Takahiro TORIYABE, 2018. "Parental Leaves and Female Skill Utilization: Evidence from PIAAC," Discussion papers 18003, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    5. Osorio, María Lucila & Madero, Sergio, 2025. "Explaining Gen Z’s desire for hybrid work in corporate, family, and entrepreneurial settings," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 83-93.
    6. Anna Michalkiewicz & Marzena Syper-Jedrzejak, 2023. "Dealing With Pressure and Stress as a Social Competence of a Manager Developed in Distance Education," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 119-130.
    7. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2025. "Working from Home in 2025: Five Key Facts," EconPol Policy Brief 73, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    8. Anna Matysiak & Agnieszka Kasperska & Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska, 2023. "Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Work From Home on Careers in the Post-Covid Context," Working Papers 2023-28, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    9. De Vito, Antonio & Hillmann, Lisa & Jacob, Martin & Vossebürger, Robert, 2025. "Do personal income taxes affect corporate tax-motivated profit shifting?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2).
    10. Ganguli, Ina & Haidar, Jamal Ibrahim & Khwaja, Asim Ijaz & Stemper, Samuel & Zafar, Basit, 2024. "Economic shocks and skill acquisition: Evidence from a national online learning platform at the onset of COVID-19," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Vincenzo Alfano & Ilaria Mariotti & Nunzia Nappo & Gaetano Vecchione, 2024. "Work-life balance during the COVID-19 pandemic. A European perspective," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 51(4), pages 1041-1065, December.
    12. Giulia Aliprandi & Alice Chiocchetti & Manon Francois & Laure Heidmann, 2025. "Shift or Share? Anatomy of Profit Shifting and Distributional Effects on Workers," CESifo Working Paper Series 12202, CESifo.
    13. Jonathan Gruber & Aaron Yelowitz, 1999. "Public Health Insurance and Private Savings," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 107(6), pages 1249-1274, December.
    14. Craig Garthwaite & Tal Gross & Matthew J. Notowidigdo, 2014. "Public Health Insurance, Labor Supply, and Employment Lock," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(2), pages 653-696.
    15. Sónia Cabral & Joana Garcia & Raquel Miranda & Susana Peralta & João Pereira dos Santos, 2024. "Treasure Islands, Real Jobs? Workers and Anti-Avoidance Policies in a Tax Paradise," Working Papers w202416, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    16. Barış Kaymak & Immo Schott, 2023. "Corporate Tax Cuts and the Decline in the Manufacturing Labor Share," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(6), pages 2371-2408, November.
    17. Hindriks, Jean & Serse, Valerio, 2022. "The incidence of VAT reforms in electricity markets: Evidence from Belgium," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    18. Schultz, T. Paul, 2009. "The Gender and Generational Consequences of the Demographic Transition and Population Policy: An Assessment of the Micro and Macro Linkages," Working Papers 71, Yale University, Department of Economics.
    19. Jonathan Gruber & James M. Poterba, 1996. "Tax Subsidies to Employer-Provided Health Insurance," NBER Chapters, in: Empirical Foundations of Household Taxation, pages 135-168, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Antoine Bozio & Bertrand Garbinti & Jonathan Goupille-Lebret & Malka Guillot & Thomas Piketty, 2020. "Predistribution vs. Redistribution: Evidence from France and the U.S," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-03022092, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ieadps:321866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieaaauk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.