IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v61y2026i3p1011-1035.html

The Role of Media in Regulatory Oversight: Evidence From Comment Letters

Author

Listed:
  • Yizhe Dong
  • Yaorong Liu
  • Meng Wang
  • Gaofeng Zou

Abstract

This study examines how media coverage impacts regulatory oversight of publicly listed firms. We find that Chinese firms with greater media attention, particularly those with negative media coverage, are more likely to receive increased regulatory oversight, as indicated by comment letters issued by stock exchanges. The main effects remain consistent after we address the endogeneity issue and under a series of robustness tests. Media oversight not only complements formal regulatory governance, but also substitutes for other non‐government governance mechanisms, such as independent auditors' reviews and institutional investors' monitoring. Through an event study, we find that media coverage accelerates regulatory interventions, particularly in the short term. We also show that the influence of media coverage on regulatory oversight is less pronounced among non‐state‐owned enterprises (non‐SOEs) and smaller and growth firms. Our results support the “watchdog” role of the media even in less open media environments and suggest a positive causal effect of media coverage on regulatory efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Yizhe Dong & Yaorong Liu & Meng Wang & Gaofeng Zou, 2026. "The Role of Media in Regulatory Oversight: Evidence From Comment Letters," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 61(3), pages 1011-1035, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:61:y:2026:i:3:p:1011-1035
    DOI: 10.1111/fire.70051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.70051
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fire.70051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:61:y:2026:i:3:p:1011-1035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.