IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v59y2024i1p121-156_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of a U.S. Approach to Enforcement: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Duan, Tinghua
  • Li, Kai
  • Rogo, Rafael
  • Zhang, Ray

Abstract

We examine the effects of implementing a U.S. approach to the enforcement of mandatory disclosure in China. Using a hand-collected sample of comment letters (CLs) issued by the Shanghai Stock Exchange over the period of 2013 to 2018, we show that stock price reactions to CL receipts and replies are negative and significant. Using textual analysis to match issues raised by regulators to targeted firms’ changes in disclosure, we show that these firms do address CL issues point by point, but do not experience significant improvements in their information environments. Our article highlights the importance of incentives rather than regulation/enforcement in reducing information asymmetry.

Suggested Citation

  • Duan, Tinghua & Li, Kai & Rogo, Rafael & Zhang, Ray, 2024. "The Effects of a U.S. Approach to Enforcement: Evidence from China," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(1), pages 121-156, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:59:y:2024:i:1:p:121-156_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109023000352/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:59:y:2024:i:1:p:121-156_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.