IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v65y2025i3p2339-2386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are auditors insulated to positive client news? Evidence from audit fees and going‐concern opinions

Author

Listed:
  • Ting‐Chiao Huang
  • Yi‐Hung Lin
  • Daniel Chai
  • Stephanie Hairston

Abstract

This paper investigates if and how auditors consider positive news, related to their clients, when making audit decisions. Using a large sample of US listed companies, we find that auditors charge lower audit fees and are less likely to issue going‐concern opinions when there are a higher number of positive news items related to their clients. Additional analyses show that the influence of positive client news on audit decisions varies with news characteristics, client size, auditor tenure, and auditor size. We also find some evidence that auditors' reactions to positive client news varies with the topic of news, and positive client news has implications for financial reporting quality and accuracy of going‐concern opinions. Collectively, these findings suggest that the media affects auditors' business risk and that auditors are not insulated to positive news.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting‐Chiao Huang & Yi‐Hung Lin & Daniel Chai & Stephanie Hairston, 2025. "Are auditors insulated to positive client news? Evidence from audit fees and going‐concern opinions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(3), pages 2339-2386, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:65:y:2025:i:3:p:2339-2386
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.13407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13407
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.13407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:65:y:2025:i:3:p:2339-2386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.