IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v96y2025i4p875-899.html

Exploring the relationship between the gender composition of senior company bodies and surplus distribution in worker cooperatives in the MONDRAGON Corporation

Author

Listed:
  • Ainhoa Ibarzabal‐Zulaika
  • Iñaki Arenaza‐Bengoa
  • Beñat Herce‐Lezeta
  • Fred Freundlich

Abstract

This study examines the influence of gender composition of the governing council (GC) and senior management council (SMC) of worker cooperatives on the distribution of cooperative surplus. The analysis relies on a panel dataset of 383 observations from 82 worker cooperatives, member firms of the MONDRAGON Corporation, over the period 2010–2022. Using the System generalized method of moments panel data methodology, the results indicate that gender composition does have an impact. Data on GCs’ gender composition on surplus distribution suggest that a higher proportion of women on these councils is associated with lower surplus allocations, in line with the substitution perspective of agency theory and several studies on women's behaviour in decision‐making bodies. Conversely, in the case of the SMCs, a positive relationship is observed between the proportion of women and surplus distribution. Although agency conflicts should be minimal in the cooperative context, the different results observed between the two governance bodies suggest that certain agency effects may be present. This suggests that the configuration and functioning of decision‐making bodies can play a key role in how surpluses are managed and distributed. These findings contribute to the literature by advancing our understanding of gender effects on senior‐level financial decision‐making processes in worker cooperatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Ainhoa Ibarzabal‐Zulaika & Iñaki Arenaza‐Bengoa & Beñat Herce‐Lezeta & Fred Freundlich, 2025. "Exploring the relationship between the gender composition of senior company bodies and surplus distribution in worker cooperatives in the MONDRAGON Corporation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 875-899, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:96:y:2025:i:4:p:875-899
    DOI: 10.1111/apce.70021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.70021
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apce.70021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine C. Eckel & Philip J. Grossman, 2002. "Sex Differences and Statistical Stereotyping in Attitudes Toward Financial Risk," Monash Economics Working Papers archive-03, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    2. Adams, Renée B. & Ferreira, Daniel, 2009. "Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 291-309, November.
    3. Arellano, Manuel & Bover, Olympia, 1995. "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 29-51, July.
    4. Saeed, Abubakr & Sameer, Muhammad, 2017. "Impact of board gender diversity on dividend payments: Evidence from some emerging economies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1100-1113.
    5. Wald, John K, 1999. "How Firm Characteristics Affect Capital Structure: An International Comparison," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 22(2), pages 161-187, Summer.
    6. Kevin Campbell & Antonio Mínguez-Vera, 2008. "Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 435-451, December.
    7. Blau, Benjamin M. & Fuller, Kathleen P., 2008. "Flexibility and dividends," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 133-152, April.
    8. Ryohei Yanagi, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Value Creation in Japan," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-10-8503-1, January.
    9. Kiss, Hubert J. & Rodriguez-Lara, Ismael & Rosa-Garcia, Alfonso, 2014. "Do women panic more than men? An experimental study of financial decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 40-51.
    10. Michael S. Rozeff, 1982. "Growth, Beta And Agency Costs As Determinants Of Dividend Payout Ratios," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 5(3), pages 249-259, September.
    11. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    12. Ajab Khan & H. Kent Baker, 2025. "Board diversity and dividend policy in India," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 887-918, June.
    13. Myers, Stewart C, 1984. "The Capital Structure Puzzle," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(3), pages 575-592, July.
    14. Mitton, Todd, 2004. "Corporate governance and dividend policy in emerging markets," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 409-426, December.
    15. Ye, Dezhu & Deng, Jie & Liu, Yi & Szewczyk, Samuel H. & Chen, Xiao, 2019. "Does board gender diversity increase dividend payouts? Analysis of global evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-26.
    16. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐de‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 2000. "Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(1), pages 1-33, February.
    17. Ernest Gyapong & Ammad Ahmed & Collins G Ntim & Muhammad Nadeem, 2021. "Board gender diversity and dividend policy in Australian listed firms: the effect of ownership concentration," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 603-643, June.
    18. Dan Lin & Lu Lin, 2020. "Does Corporate Governance Affect the Critical Corporate Policies such as Dividend Policy?," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 18-24.
    19. Easterbrook, Frank H, 1984. "Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(4), pages 650-659, September.
    20. TORTIA, Ermanno, 2025. "The economics and finance of dividend-based labor remuneration and tradable shares in worker cooperatives," MPRA Paper 125504, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. John K. Wald, 1999. "How Firm Characteristics Affect Capital Structure: An International Comparison," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 22(2), pages 161-187, June.
    22. Chen, Jie & Leung, Woon Sau & Goergen, Marc, 2017. "The impact of board gender composition on dividend payouts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 86-105.
    23. Akshita Arora, 2022. "Gender diversity in boardroom and its impact on firm performance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(3), pages 735-755, September.
    24. Mª José Senent Vidal, 2011. "¿Cómo pueden aprovechar las cooperativas el talento de las mujeres? Responsabilidad social empresarial e igualdad real [How can cooperatives take advantge of the women's talent?]," REVESCO: Revista de estudios cooperativos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Escuela de Estudios Cooperativos, issue 105, pages 57-84.
    25. Manuel Arellano & Olympia Bover, 1990. "La econometría de datos de panel," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 14(1), pages 3-45, January.
    26. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    27. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    28. Jinseon SEO & Woosuk CHOI, 2016. "WHAT DETERMINANTS AFFECT THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE OF CONSUMER CO-OPERATIVES? THE CASE OF iCOOP KOREA," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 87(1), pages 117-135, December.
    29. Tatiana Aquino Almeida & Cinthya Rachel Firmino de Morais & Antonio Carlos Coelho, 2020. "Gender diversity, governance and dividend policy in Brazil," Revista de Gestão, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(2), pages 189-205, April.
    30. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri, 2012. "Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 50-58.
    31. Ajaya Kumar Panda & Swagatika Nanda, 2020. "Determinants of capital structure; a sector-level analysis for Indian manufacturing firms," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 69(5), pages 1033-1060, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aastha Mittal & Shveta Singh, 2025. "Does CEO gender impact dividends in emerging economies?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 165-176, March.
    2. Paolo Saona & Pablo San Martín, 2018. "Determinants of firm value in Latin America: an analysis of firm attributes and institutional factors," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 65-112, January.
    3. Dang-Khoa Duong & Thi Thanh-Phuong Phan & Kim-Hung Pho & Michael McAleer, 2020. "Impact of Board Characteristics and State Ownership on Dividend Policy in Vietnam," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 24(4), pages 1-34, December.
    4. García-Meca, Emma & López-Iturriaga, Félix J. & Santana-Martín, Domingo Javier, 2022. "Board gender diversity and dividend payout: The critical mass and the family ties effect," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Qurat Ul Ain & Xianghui Yuan & Hafiz Mustansar Javaid & Jinkai Zhao & Li Xiang, 2021. "Board Gender Diversity and Dividend Policy in Chinese Listed Firms," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    6. Aruoriwo Marian Chijoke-Mgbame & Agyenim Boateng & Chijoke Oscar Mgbame, 2020. "Board gender diversity, audit committee and financial performance: evidence from Nigeria," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 262-286, July.
    7. Christian Andres & André Betzer & Inga Bongard & Marc Goergen, 2019. "Dividend policy, corporate control and the tax status of the controlling shareholder," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(2), pages 157-189, June.
    8. Renneboog, L.D.R. & Trojanowski, G., 2005. "Control Structures and Payout Policy," Other publications TiSEM a82281ef-f247-479f-a0e3-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Paul McGuinness & Kevin Lam & João Vieito, 2015. "Gender and other major board characteristics in China: Explaining corporate dividend policy and governance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 989-1038, December.
    10. Cardillo, Giovanni & Onali, Enrico & Torluccio, Giuseppe, 2021. "Does gender diversity on banks' boards matter? Evidence from public bailouts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. Chacko Jacob & Jijo Lukose P.J., 2018. "Institutional Ownership and Dividend Payout in Emerging Markets: Evidence from India," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 17(1_suppl), pages 54-82, April.
    12. İbrahim Yarba & Z. Nuray Güner, 2020. "Leverage dynamics: Do financial development and government leverage matter? Evidence from a major developing economy," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 2473-2507, November.
    13. Mª Belén Lozano García, 2011. "Analyzing the Effect of Excess Cash Accumulation on Financial Decisions," Post-Print hal-00704672, HAL.
    14. Bøhren, Øyvind & Josefsen, Morten G. & Steen, Pål E., 2012. "Stakeholder conflicts and dividend policy," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 2852-2864.
    15. Ernest Gyapong & Ammad Ahmed & Collins G Ntim & Muhammad Nadeem, 2021. "Board gender diversity and dividend policy in Australian listed firms: the effect of ownership concentration," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 603-643, June.
    16. Bandyopadhyay, Arindam & Barua, Nandita Malini, 2016. "Factors determining capital structure and corporate performance in India: Studying the business cycle effects," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 160-172.
    17. Trojanowski, G., 2004. "Ownership structure as a mechanism of corporate governance," Other publications TiSEM 5dbc874d-d1d0-44a5-9717-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Khémiri, Wafa & Noubbigh, Hédi, 2018. "Determinants of capital structure: Evidence from sub-Saharan African firms," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 150-159.
    19. Elena Alexandra Nenu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2018. "The Impact of Capital Structure on Risk and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence for the Bucharest Stock Exchange Listed Companies," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-29, April.
    20. Mário Santos & António Moreira & Elisabete Vieira, 2014. "Ownership concentration, contestability, family firms, and capital structure," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(4), pages 1063-1107, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:96:y:2025:i:4:p:875-899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.