IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beo/journl/v65y2020i224p53-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Technologies And The Financial Performance Of Female Smes In Serbia: The Mediating Role Of Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Sanja Popović-Pantić
  • Dušica Semenčenko
  • Nikola Vasilić

Abstract

Digital technologies that cre-ate innovation have the capacity to leverage economic development. The integration of digital technologies in daily operations has become a key success factor in sustainable development, market positioning, and ad-vancement. This is particulary challenging for female companies in developing coun-tries, which face numerous biases on their entrepreneurial path, including in innova-tion. This specific group of entrepreneurs faces additional barriers in implementing digital technologies and digital transfor-mation, which are considered part of their innovation capacity. However, some com-panies perform well according to finan-cial parameters, regardless of the level of digitization and innovation potential. This research paper explores the correlation be-tween financial performance and the inno-vative implementation of digital technolo-gies. The main assumption in this research is that companies that do not use digital technologies to innovate can not expect to improve their financial performance. We focus on the impact of digital technology on the financial performance of female compa-nies. We also consider the indirect impact of digital technology use on financial per-formance, with product innovation as the mediator variable. The sample consists of 46 female companies. The results of the analy-sis confirm the hypotheses that digital tech-nology has no direct influence on financial performance, and that product innovation mediates the relationship between digital technology and financial performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanja Popović-Pantić & Dušica Semenčenko & Nikola Vasilić, 2020. "Digital Technologies And The Financial Performance Of Female Smes In Serbia: The Mediating Role Of Innovation," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(224), pages 53-82, January –.
  • Handle: RePEc:beo:journl:v:65:y:2020:i:224:p:53-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ekof.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/628_NOVO-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koski, Heli, 2010. "Firm Growth and Profitability:The Role of Mobile IT and Organizational Practices," Discussion Papers 1222, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    2. Christian R. Østergaard & Bram Timmermans & Kari Kristinsson, 2009. "Beyond Technological Diversification: The Impact of Employee Diversity on Innovation," DRUID Working Papers 09-03, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    3. Verheul, Ingrid & Thurik, Roy, 2001. "Start-Up Capital: "Does Gender Matter?"," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 329-345, June.
    4. SherRhonda Gibbs & Jennifer Sequeira & Mary M. White, 2007. "Social networks and technology adoption in small business," International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 66-87.
    5. Patrick Piget & Mohamed Kossaï, 2013. "The Relationship between Information and Communication Technology Use and Firm Performance in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Electrical and Electronic Goods Manufacturing SMEs in Tunisia," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 25(3), pages 330-343.
    6. Thomas Schøtt & Maryam Cheraghi, 2015. "Gendering pursuits of innovation: embeddedness in networks and culture," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(1), pages 83-116.
    7. Yu, Yan & Dong, Xiao-Ying & Shen, Kathy Ning & Khalifa, Mohamed & Hao, Jin-Xing, 2013. "Strategies, technologies, and organizational learning for developing organizational innovativeness in emerging economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2507-2514.
    8. Patrick Piget & Mohamed Kossaï, 2013. "The Relationship between Information and Communication Technology Use and Firm Performance in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Electrical and Electronic Goods Manufacturing SMEs in Tunisia," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 25(3), pages 330-343, September.
    9. Strohmeyer, Robert & Tonoyan, Vartuhi & Jennings, Jennifer E., 2017. "Jacks-(and Jills)-of-all-trades: On whether, how and why gender influences firm innovativeness," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 498-518.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hmieleski, Keith M. & Sheppard, Leah D., 2019. "The Yin and Yang of entrepreneurship: Gender differences in the importance of communal and agentic characteristics for entrepreneurs' subjective well-being and performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 709-730.
    2. Thi-Hanh Vu & Van-Duy Nguyen & Manh-Tung Ho & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2019. "Determinants of Vietnamese Listed Firm Performance: Competition, Wage, CEO, Firm Size, Age, and International Trade," Journal of Risk and Financial Management, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Abidemi C. Adegboye & Samuel Iweriebor, 2018. "Does Access to Finance Enhance SME Innovation and Productivity in Nigeria? Evidence from the World Bank Enterprise Survey," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 30(4), pages 449-461, December.
    4. Krieger, Alexander & Block, Joern & Stuetzer, Michael, 2018. "Skill variety in entrepreneurship: A literature review and research directions," MPRA Paper 88389, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Thomas Hellmann & Ilona Mostipan & Nir Vulkan, 2019. "Be Careful What You Ask For: Fundraising Strategies in Equity Crowdfunding," NBER Working Papers 26275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Pierpaolo Parrotta & Dario Pozzoli & Mariola Pytlikova, 2014. "The nexus between labor diversity and firm’s innovation," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 303-364, April.
    7. Patience Mshenga & Robert Richardson, 2013. "Micro and small enterprise participation in tourism in coastal Kenya," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 667-681, October.
    8. Claudia Trentini & Malinka Koparanova, 2013. "Corruption and entrepreneurship: does gender matter?," ECE Discussion Papers Series 2013_1, UNECE.
    9. Supriya Garikipati & Susan Johnson & Isabelle Guérin & Ariane Szafarz, 2017. "Microfinance and Gender: Issues, Challenges and The Road Ahead," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 641-648, May.
    10. Zuzana Brixiová & Thierry Kangoye, 2016. "Start-Up Capital and Women's Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Swaziland," SALDRU Working Papers 192, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    11. Pelger, Ines, 2012. "Male vs. female business owners: Are there differences in investment behavior?," VfS Annual Conference 2012 (Goettingen): New Approaches and Challenges for the Labor Market of the 21st Century 62016, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Thaís García-Pereiro & Ivano Dileo, 2017. "Gender Differences In Entrepreneurial Activities In Italy," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - Italian Review of Economics, Demography and Statistics, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 71(3), pages 31-40, July-Sept.
    13. Muravyev, Alexander & Talavera, Oleksandr & Schäfer, Dorothea, 2009. "Entrepreneurs' gender and financial constraints: Evidence from international data," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 270-286, June.
    14. Ingrid Verheul & André Van Stel & Roy Thurik, 2006. "Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 151-183, March.
    15. Verheul, Ingrid & Thurik, Roy & Grilo, Isabel & van der Zwan, Peter, 2012. "Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self-employment: Gender and the entrepreneurial personality," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 325-341.
    16. Pham, Tho & Talavera, Oleksandr, 2018. "Discrimination, Social Capital, and Financial Constraints: The Case of Viet Nam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 228-242.
    17. Victor Martin-Sanchez & Ignacio Contín-Pilart & Martin Larraza-Kintana, 2018. "The influence of entrepreneurs’ social referents on start-up size," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 173-194, March.
    18. Meltem Ince, 2009. "A Socio-Economic Perspective on Women Entrepreneurs: Evidence from Turkey," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 138-166.
    19. Jacques Ascher, 2012. "Female Entrepreneurship – An Appropriate Response to Gender Discrimination," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 8(4), pages 97-114.
    20. Rajesh Raj S. N. & Subash Sasidharan, 2018. "Does the Caste of the Firm Owner Play a Role in Access to Finance for Small Enterprises? Evidence from India," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 56(4), pages 267-296, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital technology; innova-tion; product innovation; female compa-nies; SME; financial performance; media-tion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beo:journl:v:65:y:2020:i:224:p:53-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Goran Petrić). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/efbeoyu.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.