IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beh/jbepv1/v8y2024is2p51-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are we there yet? Resilience training as a catalyst for student creativity

Author

Listed:
  • Maria-Magdalena Rosu

    (Faculty of Business and Administration, Department of Applied Economics and Quantitative Analysis, University of Bucharest, Romania)

  • Rodica Ianole-Călin

    (Faculty of Business and Administration, Department of Applied Economics and Quantitative Analysis, University of Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This paper explores the integration of resilience training into educational settings, through the lens of behavioral insights. Namely, while resilience is often associated with traits like survival and long-term development, this study highlights its alignment with creativity - a dynamic and adaptable quality that embodies both a higher level of program attractiveness and a shift from self-reported to experimental measures. To build this connection, the paper provides a recent overview (2021-2024) of resilience interventions and creativity experiments. It examines their use, impact, and limitations, as well as methodologies for task design and assessment. Based on this analysis, we propose a foundational framework for a resilience-creativity intervention program tailored for students. The program is designed to enhance resilience while fostering creativity, using engaging and interactive activities to promote bonding and support, particularly for first-year students. Finally, we discuss implementation strategies, pilot testing, and iterative improvements, emphasizing the potential of this dual-focus intervention to address critical challenges in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria-Magdalena Rosu & Rodica Ianole-Călin, 2024. "Are we there yet? Resilience training as a catalyst for student creativity," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 8(S2), pages 51-60, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:8:y:2024:i:s2:p:51-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://sabeconomics.org/journal/RePEc/beh/JBEPv1/articles/JBEP-8-S2-6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuseppe Attanasi & Massimo Egidi & Elena Manzoni, 2023. "Target-the-Two: a lab-in-the-field experiment on routinization," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-33, January.
    2. Marco Alifano & Giuseppe Attanasi & Fabio Iannelli & Faredj Cherikh & Antonio Iannelli, 2020. "COVID-19 pandemic: a European perspective on health economic policies," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 4(S), pages 35-43, June.
    3. Dan Ariely & Uri Gneezy & George Loewenstein & Nina Mazar, 2009. "Large Stakes and Big Mistakes," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 76(2), pages 451-469.
    4. Lidia Vidal-Meliá & Marta Estrada & Diego Monferrer & Alma Rodríguez-Sánchez, 2022. "Does Mindfulness Influence Academic Performance? The Role of Resilience in Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Michele Tugade & Barbara Fredrickson, 2007. "Regulation of Positive Emotions: Emotion Regulation Strategies that Promote Resilience," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 311-333, September.
    6. Gary Charness & Daniela Grieco, 2023. "Creativity and Corporate Culture," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(653), pages 1846-1870.
    7. Charness, Gary & Grieco, Daniela, 2022. "Creativity and ambiguity tolerance," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    8. Gary Charness & Daniela Grieco, 2019. "Creativity and Incentives," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 454-496.
    9. Michael D. Cohen & Paul Bacdayan, 1994. "Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 554-568, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Attanasi & Massimo Egidi & Elena Manzoni, 2023. "Target-the-Two: a lab-in-the-field experiment on routinization," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-33, January.
    2. Michela Chessa & Benjamin Prissé, 2024. "The Evaluation of Creativity," GREDEG Working Papers 2024-16, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    3. Giuseppe Attanasi & Michela Chessa & Sara Gil-Gallen & Patrick Llerena, 2021. "A survey on experimental elicitation of creativity in economics," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 273-324.
    4. Iryna Sikora, 2019. "Creative Production and Exchange of Ideas," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(5), pages 20-44.
    5. Laske, Katharina & Schröder, Marina, 2017. "Quantity, Quality and Originality: The Effects of Incentives on Creativity," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168151, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Anne-Gaëlle Maltese & Sara Gil-Gallen & Patrick Llerena, 2023. "Disentangling the role of surface and deep-level variables on individuals’ and groups’ creative performance: A cross-level experimental evidence," Working Papers of BETA 2023-19, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    7. Benslimane, Ismaël & Crosetto, Paolo & Magni-Berton, Raul & Varaine, Simon, 2023. "Intellectual property reform in the laboratory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 204-221.
    8. Giuseppe Attanasi & Michela Chessa & Carlo Ciucani & Sara Gil Gallen, 2020. "Children's GrI-Creativity: Effects of Limited Resources in Creative Drawing," GREDEG Working Papers 2020-34, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    9. Buchanan, J., 2022. "Willingness to be paid: Who trains for tech jobs?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Goette, Lorenz & Senn, Julien, 2024. "Incentivizing interdependent tasks: Evidence from a real-effort experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri & Henderson, Austin, 2018. "Experimental methods: Measuring effort in economics experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 74-87.
    12. repec:beh:jbepv1:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:21-32 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Giuseppe Attanasi & Ylenia Curci & Patrick Llerena & Maria del Pino Ramos-Sosa & Adriana Carolina Pinate & Giulia Urso, 2019. "Looking at Creativity from East to West: Risk Taking and Intrinsic Motivation in Socially and Culturally Diverse Countries," Working Papers of BETA 2019-38, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    14. Filippo Carlo Wezel & Gino Cattani & Johannes M. Pennings, 2006. "Competitive Implications of Interfirm Mobility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 691-709, December.
    15. Gilstrap, J. Bruce & Hart, Timothy A., 2020. "How employee behaviors effect organizational change and stability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 120-131.
    16. Guido Fioretti, 2007. "A connectionist model of the organizational learning curve," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Lackner, Mario & Sonnabend, Hendrik, 2021. "Coping with advantageous inequity—Field evidence from professional penalty kicking," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Englmaier, Florian & Grimm, Stefan & Schindler, David & Schudy, Simeon, 2018. "The Effect of Incentives in Non-Routine Analytical Team Tasks – Evidence from a Field Experiment," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168286, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    19. Alex Coad, 2018. "Firm age: a survey," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 13-43, January.
    20. Kocher, Martin G. & Lenz, Marc V. & Sutter, Matthias, 2010. "Psychological pressure in competitive environments: Evidence from a randomized natural experiment: Comment," Discussion Papers in Economics 11445, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    21. Reuer, Jeffrey J. & Zollo, Maurizio, 2005. "Termination outcomes of research alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 101-115, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:8:y:2024:i:s2:p:51-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SABE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sabeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.