Macroeconomic policy: rules versus discretion
This paper debates the foundations of the principles of macroeconomic policy. It traces through the development of the ideas forming the macroconomic policy and especially the cyclical transition from observance of firmly established rules to discretion and vice versa, to curbing freedom at formation of macroecnomic influences. Reasons are brought forward backing the advantages and disadvantages of discretion in comparison with the government based on strictly formulated rules. A special attention is given to the Bulgarian practices and tradition. A conclusion is drawn that the Bulgarian governing elite has not historically succeeded in taking advantage of the opportunities offered by the discretional government and as a rule has abused (consciously or unconsciously) the right of a greater governing freedom. On the contrary, when the macroeconomic government has had to observe concrete imperative restrictions the results have been predominantly positive. The Bulgarian practice confirms the theoretical result that the losses from badly conducted discretional macroeconomic policy on a national scale are much greater than the benefits from a possible well formulated and carried out policy. Resulting from the analysis, concrete suggestions are formulated, carrying the basic idea of abiding by clearly defined rules of fiscal policy and concentrating the efforts of the state on setting up and running relevant market institutions.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): (2002)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 3, Aksakov Str., 1040, Sofia|
Phone: (+359 2) 810 40 18
Fax: (+359 2) 988 21 08
Web page: http://www.iki.bas.bg
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Vito Tanzi & Howell H. Zee, 1997. "Fiscal Policy and Long-Run Growth," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 44(2), pages 179-209, June.
- Leslie Lipschitz & Alex Mourmouras & Timothy D. Lane, 2002. "Capital Flows to Transition Economies: Master or Servant?," IMF Working Papers 02/11, International Monetary Fund.
- G. A. Mackenzie, 1989. "Are All Summary Indicators of the Stance of Fiscal Policy Misleading?," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 36(4), pages 743-770, December.
- Frank Hahn & Robert Solow, 1997. "A Critical Essay on Modern Macroeconomic Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 026258154x, June.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2002:i:6:p:3-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Diana Dimitrova)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.