IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2019i4p18-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitiveness and Related Concepts: A Logical Approach to Definition

Author

Listed:
  • Borys Volodymyrovich Burkynskyi
  • Alexei Borisovich Alyokhin
  • Anna Bogdanovna Brutman
  • Zoia Nikolaevna Sokolovska
  • Nina Ippolytivna Khumarova

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is justification of the competitiveness concept definition as an object of quantitative measurements and related basic concepts of the theory of competitiveness based on their logical deduction from the minimum number of basic concepts and fundamentals of economic theory to ensure the internal consistency of the theory’s system of key concepts.In spite of a large number of studies devoted to the theory of competitiveness and the problem of its measurement in recent decades, the state of the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the theory and, first and foremost, the definition of the very concept of competitiveness, cannot be considered satisfactory. Based on the requirements of logic imposed on scientific concepts and systems of concepts in arbitrary scientific field, as well as on basic concepts of economic theory, the paper attempts to clarify the content and formulation of the competitiveness concept and to construct a system of key concepts of the theory through logical deduction. This has required clarification (revision) of a number of the theory‘s concepts formulations and, first of all, the concept of economic agent; allowed to identify and/or establish logical connections between them; determine the place of each of them in the concepts’ system; to discover concepts, which scientific consistency as well as expediency of inclusion into conceptual system of the theory of competitiveness are debatable; achieve rigorous definitions of these concepts and internal consistency of the concept system as a whole; identify the range of theoretical issues to be solved and/or more in-depth study, which logically follow from the proposed wording of key concepts’ definitions of the theory of competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Borys Volodymyrovich Burkynskyi & Alexei Borisovich Alyokhin & Anna Bogdanovna Brutman & Zoia Nikolaevna Sokolovska & Nina Ippolytivna Khumarova, 2019. "Competitiveness and Related Concepts: A Logical Approach to Definition," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 18-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2019:i:4:p:18-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=811082
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jones, Thomas M. & Felps, Will, 2013. "Shareholder Wealth Maximization and Social Welfare: A Utilitarian Critique," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 207-238, April.
    2. Fagerberg, Jan, 1988. "International Competitiveness," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(391), pages 355-374, June.
    3. Psofogiorgos Nikolaos ALEXANDROS & Theodore METAXAS, 2016. "“Porter vs Krugman”: History, Analysis and Critique of Regional Competitiveness," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 65-80, March.
    4. Reinert, Erik S., 1995. "Competitiveness and its predecessors--a 500-year cross-national perspective," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 23-42, March.
    5. Justin Yifu Lin, 2013. "Demystifying the Chinese Economy," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 46(3), pages 259-268, September.
    6. Fagerberg, Jan, 1996. "Technology and Competitiveness," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 39-51, Autumn.
    7. Thomas Hatzichronoglou, 1996. "Globalisation and Competitiveness: Relevant Indicators," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 1996/5, OECD Publishing.
    8. Beata K. Bierut & Kamila Kuziemska-Pawlak, 2017. "Competitiveness and Export Performance of CEE Countries," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 522-542, November.
    9. Karl Aiginger, 2006. "Competitiveness: From a Dangerous Obsession to a Welfare Creating Ability with Positive Externalities," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 161-177, June.
    10. Krugman, Paul R, 1996. "Making Sense of the Competitiveness Debate," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 17-25, Autumn.
    11. Fagerberg, Jan, 1988. "International Competitiveness," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(391), pages 355-374, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janno Reiljan & Maria Hinrikus & Anneli Ivanov, 2000. "Key Issues In Defining And Analysing The Competitiveness Of A Country," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 1, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    2. Yap, Josef T., 2004. "A Note on the Competitiveness Debate," Discussion Papers DP 2004-39, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    3. Raphaël Chiappini, 2012. "Les indices composites sont-ils de bonnes mesures de la compétitivité des pays ?," Larefi Working Papers 1205, Larefi, Université Bordeaux 4.
    4. Azzopardi, Ernest & Nash, Robert, 2013. "A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 222-233.
    5. repec:phd:pjdevt:pjd_2004_vol__xxxi_no__1-a is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Karl Aiginger & Susanne Bärenthaler-Sieber & Johanna Vogel, 2015. "Competitiveness of EU versus USA. WWWforEurope Policy Paper No. 29," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58553, March.
    7. KAPITSINIS, Nikolaos & METAXAS, Theodore & DUQUENNE, Marie Noelle, 2013. "Exploring The Coherence And The Meaning Of Territorial Competition: Do National States Behave In The Same Way As Firms In Case Of Default?. The Cases Of Greece And Dubai," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 13(2), pages 57-72.
    8. Hélène Erkel-Rousse & Françoise Le Gallo, 2002. "Compétitivités prix et qualité dans le commerce international : une analyse empirique des échanges de 12 pays de l’OCDE," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 152(1), pages 93-113.
    9. Baldwin, John & Lin, Zhengxi, 2002. "Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Roberto Cellino & Anna Soci, 2002. "Pop competitiveness," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 55(220), pages 71-101.
    11. Padoan, Pier Carlo, 1998. "Trade, knowledge accumulation and diffusion: A sectoral perspective1," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 349-372, September.
    12. Fagerberg, Jan & Srholec, Martin & Verspagen, Bart, 2010. "Innovation and Economic Development," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 833-872, Elsevier.
    13. Walz, Rainer & Helfrich, Nicki & Enzmann, Alexander, 2009. "A system dynamics approach for modelling a lead-market-based export potential," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S3/2009, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    14. Fagerberg, Jan & Srholec, Martin & Knell, Mark, 2007. "The Competitiveness of Nations: Why Some Countries Prosper While Others Fall Behind," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1595-1620, October.
    15. Florian Flachenecker, 2018. "The causal impact of material productivity on macroeconomic competitiveness in the European Union," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 20(1), pages 17-46, January.
    16. Marco Grazzi & Nanditha Mathew & Daniele Moschella, 2021. "Making one’s own way: jumping ahead in the capability space and exporting among Indian firms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 931-957, July.
    17. Ray Barrell & Dirk Willem te Velde, 2002. "European Integration and Manufactures Import Demand: An Empirical Investigation of Ten European Countries," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 3(3), pages 263-293, August.
    18. Visvizi, Anna & Wosiek, Roman & Malik, Radosław, 2025. "The smart city competitiveness index (SMCI): Conceptualization, modelling, application – An evidence-based insight," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    19. Mulatu, Abay, 2016. "On the concept of 'competitiveness' and its usefulness for policy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 50-62.
    20. Voskeritsian, Horen & Veliziotis, Michail & Kapotas, Panos & Kornelakis, Andreas, 2017. "Between a rock and a hard place: social partners and reforms in the wage- setting system in Greece under austerity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84540, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Lin, Zhengxi & Baldwin, John R., 2001. "Entraves a l'adoption des technologies de pointe pour les fabricants canadiens," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 2001173f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • E00 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2019:i:4:p:18-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.