IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apd/rper00/y2016i41id374.html

Non-market Valuation of Environmental Goods in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Barata

    (Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Coimbra)

  • Paula Simões

    (Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria)

  • Luís Cruz

    (Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Coimbra)

Abstract

Este artigo explora a literatura da avaliação económica de bens ambientais em Portugal com o objetivo de identificar oportunidades para reforçar os contributos para a definição de políticas. A análise considera quatro questões: o que tem sido feito neste domínio; quais as características comuns aos diferentes estudos; o que sabemos sobre a validade das estimações; e quais as tendências mais recentes. Conclui-se que a avaliação ambiental em Portugal tem uma aplicação regional relevante com destaque para parques naturais e paisagens. A avaliação contingente é o método mais utilizado. O preço, o rendimento e o uso do recurso para recreio estão entre as variáveis explicativas mais influentes. Os resultados confirmam a validade dos métodos e o seu potencial para fins de política local/regional.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Barata & Paula Simões & Luís Cruz, 2016. "Non-market Valuation of Environmental Goods in Portugal," RPER, Associação Portuguesa para o Desenvolvimento Regional, issue 41, pages 49-59, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:apd:rper00:y:2016:i:41:id:374
    DOI: 10.59072/rper.vi41.374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.review-rper.com/index.php/rper/article/view/374
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.review-rper.com/index.php/rper/article/download/374/293
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.59072/rper.vi41.374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apd:rper00:y:2016:i:41:id:374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elisabete Martins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.review-rper.com/index.php/rper .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.