IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apa/ijhass/2017p142-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transnational Marriage In Taiwan: Challenges Faced And Adaptation Strategies Adopted In Experiencing A Different Culture

Author

Listed:
  • SHU-CHU YANG

    (National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan)

  • CHING-MIN CHANG

    (National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan)

Abstract

This is a study of how foreign brides in Taiwan adapt to the challenges of living in an unfamiliar society, particularly in terms of diet, religion, and language. Based on data collected in semi-structured interviews, the results indicate that foreign brides tend to prefer foods, which are excessively spicy and sour for the average Taiwanese. In terms of religion, most foreign brides adopt their husbands religion. As for language, it was found that foreign brides tend to be relatively direct in their manner of expression, and also tend to reply in a loud tone of voice, and that this leads to misunderstandings and makes their Taiwanese in-laws uncomfortable. It was also found that many foreign brides experience difficulties in the areas of medical care and shopping. As for the ways in which foreign brides respond to these challenges, it was found that many of those who have difficulty adapting to Taiwanese food express their dissatisfaction by eating little. With regards to religious activities, most simply follow their in-laws’ customary practices, such as burning incense. As for language, it was found that they use various means to learn both written and spoken Chinese. Many foreign brides reported having difficulty with the taste of various Taiwanese foods, but that their in-laws didn’t mind if they prepared some of their favorite foods for themselves. Many also indicated that their in-laws encouraged them to attend Chinese classes, but that there was little support for those who preferred to practice a religion different from their in-laws. The results of this study indicate that the government needs to make additional efforts to help foreign brides lay down roots in Taiwan and enjoy a happy family life, such as holding social events in various localities, running relevant training courses for foreign brides and their husbands, and promoting an overall environment which is more foreigner-friendly and linguistically diverse.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-Chu Yang & Ching-Min Chang, 2017. "Transnational Marriage In Taiwan: Challenges Faced And Adaptation Strategies Adopted In Experiencing A Different Culture," International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, vol. 3(4), pages 142-147.
    • Handle: RePEc:apa:ijhass:2017:p:142-147
    DOI: 10.20469/ijhss.3.20001-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/ijhss-v3-issue4-article-1/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/IJHSS.3.20001-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20469/ijhss.3.20001-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daiji Kawaguchi & Soohyung Lee, 2017. "Brides For Sale: Cross-Border Marriages And Female Immigration," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(2), pages 633-654, April.
    2. Shelly Lundberg & Robert A. Pollak, 2007. "The American Family and Family Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 3-26, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raphaela Hyee, 2011. "Education in a Marriage Market Model without Commitment," Working Papers 683, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    2. Jay Euijung Lee, 2025. "Marriage and misallocation: evidence from 70 years of US history," CEP Discussion Papers dp2119, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Alger, Ingela, 2021. "On the evolution of male competitiveness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 228-254.
    4. Andaluz, Joaquín & Marcén, Miriam & Molina, José Alberto, 2007. "Income Transfers, Welfare and Family Decisions," IZA Discussion Papers 2804, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Landaud, Fanny, 2021. "From employment to engagement? Stable jobs, temporary jobs, and cohabiting relationships," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Gould, Eric, 2023. "The Return to College, Marriage, and Intergenerational Mobility," CEPR Discussion Papers 18566, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Elizabeth Brainerd & Olga Malkova, 2023. "Maternity benefits and marital stability after birth: evidence from the Soviet Baltic republics," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 2309-2345, October.
    8. Lee Shinyoung & Kim Seulki & Kim Young-Chul & Ryu Doojin, 2024. "Social Support and Suicidal Ideation among Children of Cross-Border Married Couples," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17.
    9. Scott Delhommer & Domonkos F. Vamossy, 2024. "Effect of State and Local Sexual Orientation Anti-Discrimination Laws on Labor Market Differentials," Papers 2404.03794, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    10. Matthias Fahn & Ray Rees, 2011. "Household Relational Contracts for Marriage, Fertility and Divorce," CESifo Working Paper Series 3655, CESifo.
    11. Matthias Fahn & Ray Rees & Amelie Wuppermann, 2016. "Relational contracts for household formation, fertility choice and separation," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 421-455, April.
    12. Redpath, Connor, 2022. "Spousal Visa Policy and Mixed-Citizenship Couples: Evidence from the End of the Defense Of Marriage Act," SocArXiv mzuwe, Center for Open Science.
    13. Hofmann, Dirk & Qari, Salmai, 2011. "The law of attraction bilateral search and horizontal heterogeneity," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-017, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    14. Quentin Lippmann & Khushboo Surana, 2022. "The Hierarchy of Partner Preferences," Discussion Papers 22/08, Department of Economics, University of York.
    15. Shelly Lundberg & Robert A. Pollak & Jenna Stearns, 2016. "Family Inequality: Diverging Patterns in Marriage, Cohabitation, and Childbearing," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 79-102, Spring.
    16. Marianne Bertrand & Patricia Cortés & Claudia Olivetti & Jessica Pan, 2016. "Social Norms, Labor Market Opportunities, and the Marriage Gap for Skilled Women," NBER Working Papers 22015, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Daniel Wheatley & Zhongmin Wu, 2014. "Dual careers, time-use and satisfaction levels: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 443-464, September.
    18. Jamein Cunningham & Andrew Goodman-Bacon, 2025. "Changes in Family Structure and Welfare Participation since the 1960s: The Role of Legal Services," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 369-401, January.
    19. Katie R. Genadek & Sarah M. Flood & Joan Garcia Roman, 2016. "Trends in Spouses’ Shared Time in the United States, 1965–2012," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(6), pages 1801-1820, December.
    20. Cigno, A., 2016. "Conflict and Cooperation Within the Family, and Between the State and the Family, in the Provision of Old-Age Security," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 609-660, Elsevier.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apa:ijhass:2017:p:142-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://kkgpublications.com/social-sciences/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.