IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aou/nszioz/y2025i1p33-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Słabe sygnały innowacji zakłócających tradycyjne modele biznesowe edukacji akademickiej

Author

Listed:
  • Janusz Bąk
  • Grzegorz Baran

Abstract

Cel badań i hipotezy/pytania badawcze Celem artykułu jest rozpoznanie słabych sygnałów w sektorze edukacji uniwersyteckiej, mogących prowadzić do zakłóceń dotychczasowej trajektorii rozwoju na rynku edukacyjnym. Analizie i interpretacji poddane zostaną zjawiska oraz zmiany w sektorze edukacji, takie jak zmiany struktur, relacji i procesów, nowe pomysły, technologie czy też zmiany w obszarze potrzeb, preferencji i postaw wobec istniejącej oferty edukacyjnej, które z perspektywy koncepcji słabych sygnałów mogą być istotnymi wskaźnikami. Metody badawcze Metoda analizy i rozpoznania słabych sygnałów Ansoffa oraz koncepcja innowacji zakłócających zostały wykorzystane do oceny ryzyka pojawienia się innowacji zakłócających tradycyjne modele biznesowe w edukacji. Główne wyniki Rezultatem badania jest zestawienie zidentyfikowanych słabych sygnałów oraz ich konwergencji, co może istotnie zakłócić rynek edukacji uniwersyteckiej, zagrażając dominującej pozycji uniwersytetów, jeśli te nie podejmą odpowiednich działań w celu redefinicji swojej propozycji wartości oraz modeli edukacyjnych. Implikacje dla teorii i praktyki W odpowiedzi na zaprezentowane zmiany uczelnie powinny kontynuować badania nad wpływem innowacji technologicznych na edukację oraz rozwijać strategie adaptacyjne. Adaptacja ta jest kluczowa nie tylko dla utrzymania konkurencyjności, lecz także dla wykorzystania możliwości, jakie niesie przyszłość edukacji w erze cyfrowej. Przyszłe badania powinny skupić się na dalszej analizie wpływu tych innowacji na różne aspekty edukacji oraz na opracowaniu strategii adaptacyjnych dla instytucji edukacyjnych.

Suggested Citation

  • Janusz Bąk & Grzegorz Baran, 2025. "Słabe sygnały innowacji zakłócających tradycyjne modele biznesowe edukacji akademickiej," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 1, pages 33-58.
    • Handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2025:i:1:p:33-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://nsz.wat.edu.pl/pdf-207073-126330
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramon Casadesus‐Masanell & Feng Zhu, 2013. "Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor‐based business models," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 464-482, April.
    2. H. Igor Ansoff, 1980. "Strategic issue management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(2), pages 131-148, April.
    3. Daniela Andreini & Cristina Bettinelli & Nicolai J. Foss & Marco Mismetti, 2022. "Business model innovation: a review of the process-based literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1089-1121, December.
    4. C. Neerupa & R. Naveen Kumar & R. Pavithra & A. John William, 2024. "Game on for learning: a holistic exploration of Gamification’s impact on student engagement and academic performance in educational environments," Management Matters, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 38-53, April.
    5. Henry Chesbrough & Richard S. Rosenbloom, 2002. "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(3), pages 529-555, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imran M. Ilyas & Nadine Kammerlander & Roxana Turturea & Marc van Essen, 2024. "When Business Model Innovation Creates Value for Companies: A Meta‐Analysis on Institutional Contingencies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1825-1883, July.
    2. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    3. Schmück, Kilian & Schückes, Magnus & Gutmann, Tobias & Gassmann, Oliver, 2025. "Less trust, more truth: Implications and design choices for business models and platform ecosystems in the age of Web3," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Wang, Dan & Zhou, Xiao & Zhao, Pengwei & Pang, Juan & Ren, Qiaoyang, 2025. "Early identification of breakthrough technologies: Insights from science-driven innovations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    5. Sarel Gronum & John Steen & Martie-Louise Verreynne, 2016. "Business model design and innovation: Unlocking the performance benefits of innovation," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(3), pages 585-605, August.
    6. Yuliya Snihur & Llewellyn D. W. Thomas & Robert A. Burgelman, 2018. "An Ecosystem‐Level Process Model of Business Model Disruption: The Disruptor's Gambit," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1278-1316, November.
    7. Bruno Cirillo & Stefano Brusoni & Giovanni Valentini, 2014. "The Rejuvenation of Inventors Through Corporate Spinouts," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1764-1784, December.
    8. Richard Hunt & Lauren Ortiz-Hunt, 2018. "Deinstitutionalization through Business Model Evolution: Women Entrepreneurs in the Middle East and North Africa," Chapters, in: Ladislav Mura (ed.), Entrepreneurship - Development Tendencies and Empirical Approach, IntechOpen.
    9. Albøge, Kristian Groth & Andersen, Jesper Gyldenlev & Lueg, Rainer & Nielsen, Kristian Posselt, 2015. "A framework for business model development in technology-driven start-ups," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(1), pages 67-80.
    10. Matthias Filser & Sascha Kraus & Matthias Breier & Ioanna Nenova & Kaisu Puumalainen, 2021. "Business model innovation: Identifying foundations and trajectories," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 891-907, February.
    11. Sitonio, Camila & Nucciarelli, Alberto, 2018. "The Impact of Blockchain on the Music Industry," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184968, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    12. Heyes, Anthony & Lyon, Thomas P. & Martin, Steve, 2018. "Salience games: Private politics when public attention is limited," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 396-410.
    13. Beatrice d'Ippolito, 2014. "The importance of design for firms' competitiveness: a review of the literature," Working Papers hal-00936947, HAL.
    14. Xiaojing Zhao & Tengyuan Chang & Bon-Gang Hwang & Xiaopeng Deng, 2017. "Critical Factors Influencing Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Riccardo Zecchinelli & Federica Rossi & Ana Colovic & Simona Ciappei & Andrea Bonomi Savignon, 2024. "Emerging business models for digital innovation intermediaries: evidence from the Digital Innovation Hubs Initiative," Working Papers 70, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Oct 2024.
    16. Hudson Pacifico Silva & Pascale Lehoux & Renata Pozelli Sabio, 2024. "Challenges to Responsible Value Creation During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Multiple Case Study on SMEs’ Transformative Responses," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14012-14035, September.
    17. Amel Attour & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2014. "Écosystèmes et modèles d'affaires : introduction," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 11-25.
    18. Hutzschenreuter, Thomas & Kleindienst, Ingo, 2013. "(How) Does discretion change over time? A contribution toward a dynamic view of managerial discretion," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 264-281.
    19. Petra Andries & Koenraad Debackere, 2007. "Adaptation and Performance in New Businesses: Understanding the Moderating Effects of Independence and Industry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 81-99, June.
    20. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Chen, Min-Nan, 2016. "Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1845-1857.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2025:i:1:p:33-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Jurek (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://nsz.wat.edu.pl/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.