IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01948175.html

The Rejuvenation of Inventors Through Corporate Spinouts

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Cirillo

    (SKEMA Business School, GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

  • Stefano Brusoni

    (ETH Zürich - Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology [Zürich])

  • Giovanni Valentini

    (IESE Business School - IESE Business School)

Abstract

This article focuses on corporate spinouts as a strategy that can rejuvenate the inventive efforts of inventors with a long tenure in the same company. We rely on an unbalanced panel of 5,604 inventor-year observations to study a matched sample of 431 inventors employed by the Xerox Corporation and find evidence in support of three predictions. First, inventors who join a spinout increase the extent of exploration in their inventive activities. Second, they decrease the extent to which they rely on the parent organization’s knowledge. Third, because long-tenured employees, through socialization, tend to progressively adopt more exploitative behavior than short-tenured members, they benefit relatively more from the spinout experience. These results are robust to several econometric specifications that try to account for the endogeneity of the inventors’ decision to join the spinout, for the fact that spinouts’ inventive activity may be intrinsically different from that of the parent company, and for the possible presence of novel external stimuli for those who join spinouts. The data provide large-sample evidence consistent with the idea that socialization reduces opportunities for organizational learning; we discuss the implications for theory and practice.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Cirillo & Stefano Brusoni & Giovanni Valentini, 2014. "The Rejuvenation of Inventors Through Corporate Spinouts," Post-Print halshs-01948175, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01948175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruno Cirillo, 2019. "External Learning Strategies and Technological Search Output: Spinout Strategy and Corporate Invention Quality," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 361-382, March.
    2. Aracely Soto-Simeone & Marina G. Biniari, 2024. "The Enactment of a Corporate Entrepreneurial Role: A Double-Edged Sword Forged by Heart and Context," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(6), pages 1311-1357, November.
    3. Braunerhjelm, Pontus & Lappi, Emma, 2023. "Employees' entrepreneurial human capital and firm performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    4. Varshney, Mayank & Jain, Amit, 2023. "Technology acquisition following inventor exit in the biopharmaceutical industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. van de Vrande, V.J.A., 2017. "Collaborative Innovation: Creating Opportunities in a Changing World," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA-2017-071-S&E, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    6. Blomkvist, Katarina & Engzell, Jeanette & Kappen, Philip & Zander, Ivo, 2024. "How organizational conditions affect employees’ intentions to engage in intrapreneurial new venturing," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Shweta Gaonkar & Mahka Moeen, 2023. "Standing on the parent's shoulder or in its shadow? Alliance partner overlap between employee spinouts and their parents," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 415-440, February.
    8. Hu, Feng & Xi, Xun & Zhang, Yueyue, 2021. "Influencing mechanism of reverse knowledge spillover on investment enterprises’ technological progress: An empirical examination of Chinese firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    9. Dirk Martignoni & Thomas Keil, 2021. "It did not work? Unlearn and try again—Unlearning success and failure beliefs in changing environments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1057-1082, June.
    10. Jingxue Wang & Chengjun Wang & Yang Li, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Unlocking Creativity: The Impact of Inventors’ Knowledge Complementarity and Substitutability in Moderating Structural Holes," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17847-17880, December.
    11. Stephanie Lange & Marcus Wagner, 2021. "The influence of exploratory versus exploitative acquisitions on innovation output in the biotechnology industry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 659-680, February.
    12. Emma Lappi, 2024. "New hires, adjustment costs, and knowledge transfer—evidence from the mobility of entrepreneurs and skills on firm productivity," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 33(3), pages 712-737.
    13. Bahoo-Torodi, Aliasghar & Torrisi, Salvatore, 2022. "When do spinouts benefit from market overlap with parent firms?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(6).
    14. Egle Vaznyte & Petra Andries & Sarah Demeulemeester, 2021. "“Don’t leave me this way!” Drivers of parental hostility and employee spin-offs’ performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 265-293, June.
    15. Hamza-Orlinska, Aneta & Maj, Jolanta & Shantz, Amanda & Vassilopoulou, Joana, 2024. "Unlearning diversity management," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 59(2).
    16. Cirillo, Bruno & Breschi, Stefano & Prencipe, Andrea, 2018. "Divide to connect: Reorganization through R&D unit spinout as linking context of intra-corporate networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1585-1600.
    17. Chang, Sea-Jin & Matsumoto, Yoichi, 2025. "Internal redeployment versus external recruitment of inventors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(6).
    18. Urbig, Diemo & Reif, Karina & Lengsfeld, Stephan & Procher, Vivien D., 2021. "Promoting or preventing entrepreneurship? Employers’ perceptions of and reactions to employees’ entrepreneurial side jobs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01948175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.