IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/31083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Regulation And Implications For Competitiveness In International Pork Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Metcalfe, Mark R.

Abstract

Environmental concerns linked to hog production are growing in the United States, Canada, and the European Union. New regulations controlling animal manure management are being imposed to address these concerns. This study determines that potential increases in U.S. and Canadian environmental regulation would have minimal effects on the relative competitiveness of pork exports for these countries. By contrast, more stringent European Union regulations have potential to significantly reduce EU competitiveness and contribute to the trend of increasing export market share for U.S. and Canadian pork products.

Suggested Citation

  • Metcalfe, Mark R., 2002. "Environmental Regulation And Implications For Competitiveness In International Pork Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31083
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31083/files/27010222.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaw, Ian & Shaffer, John A. & Premakumar, V. & Hayes, Dermot J., 1997. "Policy and Forecasting Models for the Chinese, South Korean, Australian, and European Union Meat Sectors," CARD Technical Report Series 18651, Iowa State University, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development.
    2. Leuck, Dale J. & Haley, Stephen L. & Liapis, Peter S. & McDonald, Bradley, 1995. "The EU Nitrate Directive and CAP Reform: Effects on Agricultural Production, Trade and Residual Soil Nitrogen," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 148007, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Giancarlo Moschini & Karl D. Meilke, 1989. "Modeling the Pattern of Structural Change in U.S. Meat Demand," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(2), pages 253-261.
    4. Karl D. Skold & Eric Grundmeier & Stanley R. Johnson, 1989. "CARD Livestock Model Documentation: Pork," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 88-tr4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    5. Ronald A. Fleming & Bruce Babcock & Erda Wang, 1998. "Resource or Waste? The Economics of Swine Manure Storage and Management," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 96-113.
    6. Karl D. Skold & Eric Grundmeier & Stanley R. Johnson, 1989. "CARD Livestock Model Documentation: Pork," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 88-tr4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    7. Matthew T. Holt & Stanley R. Johnson, 1988. "Supply Dynamics in the U.S. Hog Industry," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 36(2), pages 313-335, July.
    8. Brewer, Clarence & Kliebenstein, James & Hayenga, Marvin, 1998. "Pork Production Costs: A Comparison Of Major Pork Exporting Countries," ISU General Staff Papers 199806300700001301, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. Brewer, Clarence L. & Hayenga, Marvin L. & Kliebenstein, James, 1998. "Pork Production Costs: A Comparison of Major Pork Exporting Countries," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1265, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Beghin, John C. & Metcalfe, Mark, 2000. "Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness in the Hog Industry: An International Perspective," Staff General Research Papers Archive 5090, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Ian Shaw & John Shaffer & V. Premakumar, 1997. "Policy and Forecasting Models for the Chinese, South Korean, Australian, and European Union Meat Sectors," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 97-tr35, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    12. Beghin, John C. & Blake Brown, A. & Hasyim Zaini, M., 1997. "Impact of domestic content requirement on the US tobacco and cigarette industries," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 201-212, January.
    13. Lauwers, L. & Van Huylenbroeck, G. & Martens, L., 1998. "A systems approach to analyse the effects of Flemish manure policy on structural changes and cost abatement in pig farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 167-183, February.
    14. Alston, Julian M, 1986. "The Effects of the CAP on International Trade in Poultry Meat," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 13(2), pages 217-231.
    15. Ian Shaw & John Shaffer & V. Premakumar, 1997. "Policy and Forecasting Models for the Chinese, South Korean, Australian, and European Union Meat Sectors," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 97-tr35, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colyer, Dale, 2004. "Environmental Regulations And Competitiveness," Working Papers 19100, West Virginia University, Department of Agricultural Resource Economics.
    2. Arens, Ludwig & Thulke, Hans-Hermann & Eisinger, Dirk & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2012. "Administrative cooperation and disease control in cross-border pork production," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 473-482.
    3. Colyer, Dale, 2003. "Agriculture and Environmental Issues in Free Trade Agreements," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21.
    4. Colyer, Dale, 2004. "Environmental Regulations and Agricultural Competitiveness," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17.
    5. Wasylyniuk, Chad R. & Bessel, Kristan M. & Kerr, William A. & Hobbs, Jill E., 2003. "The Evolving International Trade Regime For Food Safety And Environmental Standards: Potential Opportunities And Constraints For Saskatchewan'S Beef Feedlot Industry," Reports 23937, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade.
    6. Johansson, Robert C. & Kara, Erdal & Ribaudo, Marc, 2006. "On how environmental stringency influences BMP adoption," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21207, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Metcalfe, Mark R., 2001. "Environmental Regulation And Implications For Competitiveness In International Pork Trade," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14565, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    2. Metcalfe, Mark R., 2000. "Environmental Regulation And Implications For U.S. Pork Exports," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21808, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Eswaramoorthy, K., 1991. "U.S. livestock production and factor demand: a multiproduct dynamic dual approach," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000010523, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Dermot J. Hayes & Roxanne Clemens, 1997. "Chinese Market for U.S. Pork Exports, The," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 97-bp14, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    5. Buhr, Brian L., 1993. "A Quarterly Econometric Simulation Model Of The U.S. Livestock And Meat Sector," Staff Papers 13465, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Wang, Dong & Parton, Kevin A. & Deblitz, Claus, 2008. "Impact of potential dairy-beef production on China's beef supply, demand and international trade," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 16.
    7. Conforti, Piero, 2001. "The Common Agricultural Policy In Main Partial Equilibrium Models," Working Papers 14806, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Osservatorio Sulle Politiche Agricole dell'UE.
    8. Jingjing Wang & Xiaoyang Wang & Xiaohua Yu, 2023. "Shocks, cycles and adjustments: The case of China's Hog Market under external shocks," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 703-726, July.
    9. Vere, David T. & Griffith, Garry R. & Silvester, Luke T., 2005. "Australian Sheep Industry CRC: Economic Evaluations of Scientific Research Programs," Research Reports 42651, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    10. Frank H. Fuller, 1997. "Policy and Projection Model for the Meat Sector in the People's Republic of China," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 97-tr36, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    11. Frank H. Fuller, 1997. "Policy and Projection Model for the Meat Sector in the People's Republic of China," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 97-tr36, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    12. Fabio C. Zanini & Philip Garcia, 1997. "Did Producer Hedging Opportunities in the Live Hog Contract Decline?," Finance 9712005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Manchanda, Sumit & Kliebenstein, James B. & McKean, James D., 1995. "Economic Comparison of Alternatives to Sulfamethazine Use in Pork Production," ISU General Staff Papers 199507010700001265, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    14. Liang, Jing, 2010. "Three essays on food safety and foodborne illness," ISU General Staff Papers 201001010800002782, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Grundmeier, Eric & Hayes, Dermot, 1990. "An Examination of the Likely Impact of the Withdrawal of Bovine Growth Promotants on the U.S. Beef Industry," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271032, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Park, Dooho & Davies, Stephen P. & Seidl, Andrew F., 2001. "A Nationwide, State-Level, Analysis Of Animal Confinement Policy By Selected Species," 2001 Annual Meeting, July 8-11, 2001, Logan, Utah 36160, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    17. Beaulieu, Martin S. & Bedard, Frederic & Lanciault, Pierre, 2001. "Distribution and Concentration of Canadian Livestock," Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series 28016, Statistics Canada.
    18. Park, Dooho & Seidl, Andrew F. & Davies, Stephen P. & Frasier, W. Marshall, 2000. "Environmental Policy Influences On Livestock Stocking And Location Decisions," 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia 36340, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    19. Unterschultz, James R., 2000. "New Instruments For Co-Ordination And Risk Sharing Within The Canadian Beef Industry," Project Report Series 24046, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    20. Goodwin, Barry K., 1992. "Forecasting Cattle Prices in the Presence of Structural Change," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 11-22, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.