IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/waeava/36340.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Environmental Policy Influences On Livestock Stocking And Location Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Dooho
  • Seidl, Andrew F.
  • Davies, Stephen P.
  • Frasier, W. Marshall

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between state level environmental regulations and stocking and location decisions in the U.S livestock and poultry industry (beef, chicken, dairy and hogs). Rather than conduct this analysis on a species-by-species basis, we choose to focus upon the overall size of the livestock industry (expressed in animal units) and the size of industry found on large, medium and small operations by state (48) and over time (28 yrs). Results indicate that industry may drive policy rather than the converse. However, since we also find that existing policy rules have differential impacts on the industry by operation size, we conclude that structural change in the industry may be driven in part by size or legal structure discriminating regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Dooho & Seidl, Andrew F. & Davies, Stephen P. & Frasier, W. Marshall, 2000. "Environmental Policy Influences On Livestock Stocking And Location Decisions," 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia 36340, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:waeava:36340
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.36340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/36340/files/sp00pa03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.36340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hubbell, Bryan J., 1997. "Entropy Based Measurement Of Geographic Concentration In U.S. Hog Production," Faculty Series 16722, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. Martin, Laura L. & Zering, Kelly D., 1997. "Relationships Between Industrialized Agriculture And Environmental Consequences: The Case Of Vertical Coordination In Broilers And Hogs," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Wayne B. Gray, 1997. "Manufacturing Plant Location: Does State Pollution Regulation Matter?," NBER Working Papers 5880, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Virginia D. McConnell & Robert M. Schwab, 1990. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Industry Location Decisions: The Motor Vehicle Industry," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 66(1), pages 67-81.
    5. Gomez, Irma A. & Love, H. Alan & Burton, Diana M., 1998. "Analysis Of The Effects Of Environmental Regulation On Pulp And Paper Industry Structure," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20938, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Erik Biørn & Rolf Golombek* & Arvid Raknerud, 1998. "Environmental Regulations and Plant Exit," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(1), pages 35-59, January.
    7. Metcalfe, Mark R., 1999. "Location Of Production And Endogenous Water Quality Regulation: A Look At The U.S. Hog Industry," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21631, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Mark R Metcalfe & John C Beghin, 2015. "Piecemeal Reform of Trade and Environmental Policy When Consumption Also Pollutes," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(4), pages 2282-2287.
    9. Ronald A. Fleming & Bruce Babcock & Erda Wang, 1998. "Resource or Waste? The Economics of Swine Manure Storage and Management," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 96-113.
    10. Baumol,William J. & Oates,Wallace E., 1988. "The Theory of Environmental Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521322249.
    11. Matthey, Holger & Royer, Jeffrey S., 1999. "Testing The Impact Of Corporate Farming Laws On Hog Industry Growth: A Partial Adjustment Approach," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21697, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Henderson, J Vernon, 1996. "Effects of Air Quality Regulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(4), pages 789-813, September.
    13. Pritchett, James G. & Liu, Donald J., 1998. "Estimating Backward Integration In A Primary Input Market: The Case Of U.S. Hog Industry," Conference Papers 14480, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    14. Hemmer, Ronald, 1998. "Some Impacts Of Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality (Adeq) Enforcement In The Dairy Industry In Maricopa County, Arizona," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20871, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Mark R. Metcalfe, 1999. "Location of Production and Endogenous Water Quality Regulation: A Look at the U.S. Hog Industry," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 99-wp219, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    16. V. James Rhodes, 1995. "The Industrialization of Hog Production," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 107-118.
    17. Levinson, Arik, 1996. "Environmental regulations and manufacturers' location choices: Evidence from the Census of Manufactures," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 5-29, October.
    18. Beghin, John C. & Metcalfe, Mark, 2000. "Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness in the Hog Industry: An International Perspective," Staff General Research Papers Archive 5090, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Norris, Patricia E. & Thurow, Amy Purvis, 1997. "Environmental Policy And Technology Adoption In Animal Agriculture," Staff Paper Series 11660, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    20. Hurley, Sean P. & Kliebenstein, James B., 1999. "The Potential For Marketing Pork Products With Embedded Environmental Attributes: Results From An Experimental Study," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21598, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    21. Martin, Laura L. & Norris, Patricia E., 1998. "Environmental Quality, Environmental Regulation And The Structure Of Animal Agriculture," Agricultural Outlook Forum 1998 33267, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    22. Lovell, Sabrina J. & Kuch, Peter J., 1999. "Rethinking Regulation of Animal Agriculture," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-5.
    23. Thurow, Amy Purvis & Holt, John, 1997. "Induced Policy Innovation: Environmental Compliance Requirements for Dairies in Texas and Florida," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 17-36, July.
    24. Thurow, Amy Purvis & Holt, John, 1997. "Induced Policy Innovation: Enivronmental Compliance Requirements For Dairies In Texas And Florida," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Park, Dooho & Davies, Stephen P. & Seidl, Andrew F., 2001. "A Nationwide, State-Level, Analysis Of Animal Confinement Policy By Selected Species," 2001 Annual Meeting, July 8-11, 2001, Logan, Utah 36160, Western Agricultural Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Dooho & Davies, Stephen P. & Seidl, Andrew F., 2001. "A Nationwide, State-Level, Analysis Of Animal Confinement Policy By Selected Species," 2001 Annual Meeting, July 8-11, 2001, Logan, Utah 36160, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Park, Dooho & Seidl, Andrew & Davies, Stephen, 2002. "Environmental Policy and Industry Location: The Case of the U.S. Livestock Industry," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 32(2), pages 293-307, Summer/Fa.
    3. Herath, Deepananda P.B. & Weersink, Alfons, 2004. "The Locational Determinants Of Large Livestock Operations: Evidence From The U.S. Hog, Dairy, And Fed-Cattle Sectors," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19927, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Biing-Shiunn Yang & Chao-Cheng Mai, 2013. "The impact of uncertain environmental regulatory policy on optimal plant location and anti-pollution technology selection," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 50(3), pages 753-769, June.
    5. Ronald J Shadbegian & Wayne B Gray, 2001. "When Do Firms Shift Production Across States to Avoid Environmental Regulation?," Working Papers 01-18, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    6. McBride, William D. & Key, Nigel D., 2003. "Economic And Structural Relationships In U.S. Hog Production," Agricultural Economic Reports 33971, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Herath, Deepananda P.B. & Weersink, Alfons & Carpentier, Chantal Line, 2005. "Spatial Dynamics of the Livestock Sector in the United States: Do Environmental Regulations Matter?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(1), pages 1-24, April.
    8. Aditi Jamalpuria, 2017. "Environmental Regulatory Efficacy in India: An Inter-State Comparison," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Norris, Patricia E. & Thurow, Amy Purvis, 1997. "Environmental Policy And Technology Adoption In Animal Agriculture," Staff Paper Series 11660, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    10. Randy A. Becker, 2011. "On Spatial Heterogeneity in Environmental Compliance Costs," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(1), pages 28-44.
    11. Wilhelm Althammer & Erik Hille, 2016. "Measuring climate policy stringency: a shadow price approach," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 23(4), pages 607-639, August.
    12. Wolfgang Keller & Arik Levinson, 1999. "Environmental Compliance Costs and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to U.S. States," NBER Working Papers 7369, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Becker, Randy A., 2011. "Local environmental regulation and plant-level productivity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2516-2522.
    14. List, John A., 2001. "US county-level determinants of inbound FDI: evidence from a two-step modified count data model," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 953-973, May.
    15. Naughton, Helen T., 2014. "To shut down or to shift: Multinationals and environmental regulation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 113-117.
    16. Alfons Weersink & Christin Eveland, 2006. "The Siting of Livestock Facilities and Environmental Regulations," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 54(1), pages 159-173, March.
    17. Wallace E. Oates & Wallace E. Oates, 2004. "A Reconsideration of Environmental Federalism," Chapters, in: Environmental Policy and Fiscal Federalism, chapter 7, pages 125-156, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Tim Jeppesen & John A. List & Henk Folmer, 2002. "Environmental Regulations and New Plant Location Decisions: Evidence from a Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 19-49, February.
    19. Vikash Ramiah & Jacopo Pichelli & Imad Moosa, 2015. "The Effects of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Performance: A Chinese Perspective," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-31, December.
    20. Morgenstern, Richard D. & Pizer, William A. & Shih, Jhih-Shyang, 2002. "Jobs Versus the Environment: An Industry-Level Perspective," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 412-436, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:waeava:36340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.