IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/inrace/201681.html

Le découplage et les droits à paiement unique dans les exploitations laitières et bovins-viande en France

Author

Listed:
  • Chatellier, Vincent

Abstract

La réforme de la Politique agricole commune (PAC), décidée par le Conseil européen en juin 2003, modifie le mode d’intervention des pouvoirs publics au sein de l’agriculture européenne. En France, la mise en oeuvre d’un paiement unique découplé en substitution d’une partie des paiements compensatoires alloués historiquement sur la base des facteurs de production constitue une rupture importante, notamment dans le secteur bovin (lait et viande bovine). L’objectif de cet article est de mesurer les conséquences de cette réforme de la PAC sur l’évolution, à l’horizon de 2007, des aides directes et du paiement unique dans différentes catégories d’exploitations laitières et bovins-viande françaises. La simulation, qui est conduite sur la base des données individuelles du Réseau d'information comptable agricole (RICA) de l’exercice 2003, prend en compte des hypothèses de gains de productivité et traite de deux options de découplage : partiel (au sens des modalités retenues en France) et total (comme la réglementation communautaire le permet). Sur la base de la situation projetée, une discussion est ensuite engagée sur les possibilités offertes aux États membres d’une éventuelle redistribution des soutiens directs. Ce travail permet de souligner les principaux points suivants : le revenu de la très grande majorité des exploitations bovines deviendra, au terme de la réforme, fortement dépendant des soutiens directs ; le dispositif de modulation concernera plus de 95% des exploitations bovines ; le montant du paiement unique (rapporté à l'exploitation, à l’hectare ou aux résultats économiques) variera fortement selon la taille de l’exploitation, son système productif historique et son niveau d’intensification ; le principe de la régionalisation du paiement unique (articles n° 58 et 59 du règlement n° 1782) conduit, dans une région administrative donnée, à un transfert de soutiens directs des unités les plus intensives vers les unités les plus extensives, mais ne permet pas d’opérer, comme c’est le cas de l’article n° 69, une redistribution de fonds entre régions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chatellier, Vincent, 2006. "Le découplage et les droits à paiement unique dans les exploitations laitières et bovins-viande en France," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 78.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:inrace:201681
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.201681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/201681/files/78-53-80.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.201681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beard, Nick & Swinbank, Alan, 2001. "Decoupled payments to facilitate CAP reform," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 121-145, April.
    2. Aude Ridier & Florence Jacquet, 2002. "Decoupling Direct Payments and the Dynamics of Decisions under Price Risk in Cattle Farms," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 549-565, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean-Christophe J.-C. Bureau & Alexandre Gohin & Sébastien Jean, 2007. "The CAP and WTO negotiation [La PAC et la négociation OMC]," Post-Print hal-02821142, HAL.
    2. Baptiste Lelyon & Vincent Chatellier & Karine Daniel, 2011. "Decoupling and prices: determinant of dairy farmers’ choices?," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 92(1), pages 47-68.
    3. Lelyon, Baptiste & Daniel, Karine & Chatellier, Vincent, 2008. "Decoupling and prices: determinant of dairy farmers’ choices? A model to analyse impacts of the 2003 CAP reform," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44250, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Lelyon, Baptiste & Chatellier, Vincent & Daniel, Karine, "undated". "Milk Quotas Abolishment And Simplification Of The Single Payment Scheme: Implications On Dairy Farmers’ Productive Strategy In The West Of France," 109th Seminar, November 20-21, 2008, Viterbo, Italy 44795, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1735 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Davis & Sudhanshu Handa & Marta Ruiz-Arranz & Marco Stampini & Paul Winters, 2002. "Conditionality and the Impact of Programme Design on Household welfare: Comparing two diverse cash transfer programmes in rural Mexico," Working Papers 02-10, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    2. Rezbova, Helena & Tomsík, Karel, . "Impact of Complementary National Direct Payments on Cattle Breeding Sector," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 4(4 Special), pages 1-11.
    3. J.Ph. Boussemart & K. Kerstens & S. Blancard & W. Briec, 2007. "Technology Adoption in French Agriculture and the role of Financial Constraints," Post-Print hal-00287974, HAL.
    4. F. Střeleček & J. Lososová & R. Zdeněk, 2011. "Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2009," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(3), pages 103-117.
    5. Serra, Teresa & Goodwin, Barry K. & Featherstone, Allen M., 2011. "Risk behavior in the presence of government programs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 18-24, May.
    6. Pierre-Alain Jayet & Julien Labonne, 2005. "Impact d'une réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune par le découplage," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 167(1), pages 101-116.
    7. James Breen & Fiona Thorne & Thia Hennessy, 2005. "Decoupled Payments and the Decision to Produce," Working Papers 0502, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    8. Hopkins, Jeffrey W. & Hanson, Kenneth & Somwaru, Agapi & Burfisher, Mary E., 2003. "Allocation Effects of Policy Reform: A Micro-Simulation of Macro-Model Results for the United States," Policy Reform and Adjustment Workshop, October 23-25, 2003, Imperial College London, Wye Campus 15750, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    9. Guillermo Flichman & Florence Jacquet, 2003. "Le couplage des modèles agronomiques et économiques : intérêt pour l'analyse des politiques," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 67, pages 51-69.
    10. Zhu, Xueqin & Milán Demeter, Róbert, 2012. "Technical efficiency and productivity differentials of dairy farms in three EU countries: the role of CAP subsidies," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(01), pages 1-27.
    11. Lelyon, Baptiste & Daniel, Karine & Chatellier, Vincent, 2008. "Decoupling and prices: determinant of dairy farmers’ choices? A model to analyse impacts of the 2003 CAP reform," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44250, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Meixing Dai, 2015. "La politique agricole commune en Europe : vers la libéralisation des marchés et le développement durable," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 1, pages 247-281, janvier.
    13. D'Amico, Mario & Coppola, Adele & Chinnici, Gaetano & Di Vita, Giuseppe & Pappalardo, Gioacchino, 2012. "EU Agricultural Systems in the new CAP perspectives," 126th Seminar, June 27-29, 2012, Capri, Italy 126116, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Meixing Dai, 2004. "La politique agricole commune en Europe?: vers la libéralisation et le développement durable," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 1, pages 243-274, mai.
    15. Thia Hennessy & Shailesh Shrestha & Stephen Hynes, 2006. "The Effect of Decoupling on Farming in Ireland: A Regional Analysis," Working Papers 0611, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    16. Rong-Gang Cong & Mark Brady, 2012. "How to Design a Targeted Agricultural Subsidy System: Efficiency or Equity?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-12, August.
    17. Stefan Mann & Simon Lanz, 2013. "Happy Tinbergen: Switzerland's New Direct Payment System," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 12(3), pages 24-28, December.
    18. Czekaj, Stefania & Czubak, Wawrzyniec & Góral, Justyna & Kagan, Adam & Majewski, Edward & Poczta, Walenty & Sadowski, Arkadiusz & Wąs, Adam, 2013. "Impact of the reformed direct payments on the Polish farms," Multiannual Program Reports 182522, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    19. Ricome, Aymeric & Chaib, Karim & Ridier, Aude & Kephaliacos, Charilaos & Carpy-Goulard, Francoise, 2016. "The Role of Marketing Contracts in the Adoption of Low-Input Production Practices in the Presence of Income Supports: An Application in Southwestern France," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-29.
    20. Jean-Christophe J.-C. Bureau & Alexandre Gohin & Sébastien Jean, 2007. "The CAP and WTO negotiation [La PAC et la négociation OMC]," Post-Print hal-02821142, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inrace:201681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inratfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.