IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijofsd/345350.html

The Impact of Producers’ Cognitive Styles on their Purchasing Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Feeney, Roberto
  • Accursi, Federico
  • Clay, Pablo Mac

Abstract

This paper inquires on the impact of cognitive styles over the decision-making process producers perform while making input and capital equipment purchases. We will question if Argentine farmers with diverse cognitive styles have different purchasing behaviors when buying the inputs they use in their farming operations. Cognitive styles express differences in the way decision-makers process information and organize knowledge. Results show that different segments of producers have distinctive purchasing behaviors. Specifically, analytic-oriented producers tend to focus more on product performance and less on the relationship with suppliers when buying their inputs. They also tend to be loyal to input brands, they rely less on dealers/retailers and salespeople, and they are willing to change suppliers more often than other producers. Intuitive-oriented producers value more the relationship with the supplier and are interested in contacting the salesperson if they need a product. While balanced-oriented producers declare to be less loyal to brands but are more stable in terms of not changing input suppliers frequently. This characterization of producers has important business implications, since identifying and segmenting the different types of producers with different cognitive styles and distinctive buying profiles is a key aspect of the strategic marketing plan of any company in the input markets. To our knowledge, this is the first paper on the topic of cognitive styles of Argentine producers and their impact on their purchasing behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Feeney, Roberto & Accursi, Federico & Clay, Pablo Mac, 2019. "The Impact of Producers’ Cognitive Styles on their Purchasing Behavior," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(05), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:345350
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345350/files/THE%20IMPACT%20OF%20PRODUCERS%E2%80%99%20COGNITIVE%20STYLES%20ON%20THEIR%20PURCHASING%20BEHAVIOR.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roucan-Kane, Maud & Alexander, Corinne E. & Boehlje, Michael & Downey, W. Scott & Gray, Allan W., . "Large Commercial Producer Market Segments for Agricultural Capital Equipment," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18.
    2. Silvia Raffaldi & Paola Iannello & Laura Vittani & Alessandro Antonietti, 2012. "Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace," SAGE Open, , vol. 2(2), pages 21582440124, May.
    3. Harbor, Anetra L. & Martin, Marshall A. & Akridge, Jay T., 2006. "Assessing Agricultural Input Brand Loyalty Among U.S. Mid-Size and Commercial Producers," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21460, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Daniel Kahneman, 2003. "A Psychological Perspective on Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(2), pages 162-168, May.
    5. Maarten Kool & Matthew T. G. Meulenberg & Douwe-Frits Broens, 1997. "Extensiveness of farmers' buying processes," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 301-318.
    6. Niraj Kumar & Sanjeev Kapoor, 2017. "Extensiveness of farmers’ buying process of agri-inputs in India: implications for marketing," Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 35-51, May.
    7. Christopher W. Allinson & John Hayes, 1996. "The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition‐Analysis For Organizational Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 119-135, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ferman Haider Haidery & Kaushik Kundu & Dev Narayan Sarkar, 2024. "Agri-input Buying Behaviour of Paddy Farmers: A Study in the Context of the New Normal Due to COVID-19," Vision, , vol. 28(1), pages 111-119, February.
    2. Niavis, Spyros & Kyrgiakos, Leonidas-Sotirios & Kleisiari, Christina & Vlontzos, George, 2020. "What Drives Farmers’ Decisions to Invest? The Role of Research Engagement, Information Collection and Type of Farm," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 11(03), September.
    3. Maaz Ahmad Khan & Ritika Mahajan, 2025. "Barriers and Drivers to CE in Agribusiness: A Systematic Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 51-78, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro Harmath & Roberto Feeney & Josefa Ramoni-Perazzi, 2022. "Producers’ brand-dealer dual loyalty to capital equipment," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(4), pages 390-407, December.
    2. Talent Nyamhamba & Daisy Ifeoma Odunze, 2022. "Opinion Leaders versus Interpersonal Forces: Analysis of the Relative Influence on Zimbabwean Farmers Input Purchase Behavior," European Journal of Development Studies, European Open Science, vol. 2(5), pages 94-102, October.
    3. Ferman Haider Haidery & Kaushik Kundu & Dev Narayan Sarkar, 2024. "Agri-input Buying Behaviour of Paddy Farmers: A Study in the Context of the New Normal Due to COVID-19," Vision, , vol. 28(1), pages 111-119, February.
    4. Qi Li & Qiang Jiang & Jyh-Chong Liang & Weiyan Xiong & Wei Zhao, 2025. "Roles of programming self-efficacy, cognitive styles, and self-regulated learning strategies on computational thinking in computer programming," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Mzoughi, Naoufel, 2011. "Farmers adoption of integrated crop protection and organic farming: Do moral and social concerns matter?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1536-1545, June.
    6. Ronald K. Mitchell & Lowell W. Busenitz & Barbara Bird & Connie Marie Gaglio & Jeffery S. McMullen & Eric A. Morse & J. Brock Smith, 2007. "The Central Question in Entrepreneurial Cognition Research 2007," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(1), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Goel, Sanjay & Mazzola, Pietro & Phan, Phillip H. & Pieper, Torsten M. & Zachary, Ramona K., 2012. "Strategy, ownership, governance, and socio-psychological perspectives on family businesses from around the world," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 54-65.
    8. Easterlin, Richard A. & Angelescu McVey, Laura, 2009. "Happiness and Growth the World Over: Time Series Evidence on the Happiness-Income Paradox," IZA Discussion Papers 4060, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. Joseph R. Blasi & Douglas L. Kruse & Richard B. Freeman, 2010. "Epilogue (and Prologue)," NBER Chapters, in: Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing, and Broad-based Stock Options, pages 377-386, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Lin, Nidthida & Wilden, Ralf & Chirico, Francesco & Ghasrodashti, Elahe & DeTienne, Dawn R., 2022. "Persist or let it go: Do rational entrepreneurs make decisions rationally?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    11. Tim R. Holcomb & R. Duane Ireland & R. Michael Holmes Jr. & Michael A. Hitt, 2009. "Architecture of Entrepreneurial Learning: Exploring the Link among Heuristics, Knowledge, and Action," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 167-192, January.
    12. Frederiks, Elisha R. & Stenner, Karen & Hobman, Elizabeth V., 2015. "Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1385-1394.
    13. Chan, Chien Sheng Richard & Park, Haemin Dennis, 2013. "The influence of dispositional affect and cognition on venture investment portfolio concentration," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 397-412.
    14. Sezer Ülkü & Chris Hydock & Shiliang Cui, 2022. "Social Queues (Cues): Impact of Others’ Waiting in Line on One’s Service Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7958-7976, November.
    15. Kopalle, Praveen K. & Kuusela, Hannu & Lehmann, Donald R., 2023. "The role of intuition in CEO acquisition decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Hermann, Daniel & Musshoff, Oliver & Agethen, Katrin, 2014. "I will never switch sides: an experimental approach to determine drivers for investment decisions of conventional and organic hog farmers," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 183084, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Cheryl R. Mitteness & Rich DeJordy & Manju K. Ahuja & Richard Sudek, 2016. "Extending the Role of Similarity Attraction in Friendship and Advice Networks in Angel Groups," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(3), pages 627-655, May.
    18. Vincenzo Butticè & Veroniek Collewaert & Silvia Stroe & Tom Vanacker & Silvio Vismara & Xavier Walthoff-Borm, 2022. "Equity Crowdfunders’ Human Capital and Signal Set Formation: Evidence From Eye Tracking," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(5), pages 1317-1343, September.
    19. Dimitriadis, Nikolaos & Psychogios, Alexandros, 2020. "Social Brain-Constructed Relational Leadership:A Neuroscience View of the Leader-Follower Duality," CAFE Working Papers 1, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:345350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/centmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.