IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/akf/cafewp/1.html

Social Brain-Constructed Relational Leadership:A Neuroscience View of the Leader-Follower Duality

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitriadis, Nikolaos
  • Psychogios, Alexandros

Abstract

Relationship-based approaches to leadership represent one of the most fast growing leadership fields that emphasize the interaction between the leader and the follower. The critical question though is the way that leadership actors (leaders and followers) are linked to each other and in particular how they try to understand how to do that in the workplace. Also, what is even lessunderstood is the role of consciousness in this relationship. In this respect, this conceptual paper explores consciousness within the context of the social brain theory to argue that leadership actors need to revise their approach to individuality and focus on mutually dependent relations. We introduce the concept of Homo Relationalis arguing that leadership is not just social constructed element, but also social brain constructed phenomenon. We finally recommend a new approach ofapplying cognitive style analysis to capture the duality of leader/follower in the same person, following the self-illusion theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitriadis, Nikolaos & Psychogios, Alexandros, 2020. "Social Brain-Constructed Relational Leadership:A Neuroscience View of the Leader-Follower Duality," CAFE Working Papers 1, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.
    • Handle: RePEc:akf:cafewp:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/8721/1/20191219_CAFE_WP1_Dimitriadis%20and%20Psychogios.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilary Bradbury & Benyamin M. Bergmann Lichtenstein, 2000. "Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring The Space Between," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 551-564, October.
    2. Christopher W. Allinson & John Hayes, 1996. "The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition‐Analysis For Organizational Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 119-135, January.
    3. Chen, Ming-Huei & Chang, Yu-Yu & Lo, Ya-Hsun, 2015. "Creativity cognitive style, conflict, and career success for creative entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 906-910.
    4. Ann L. Cunliffe, 2001. "Managers as Practical Authors: Reconstructing our Understanding of Management Practice," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 351-371, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carla S. Marques & Cândido Lopes & Vitor Braga & Vanessa Ratten & Gina Santos, 2022. "Intuition and rationality in intrapreneurship and innovation outputs: The case of health professionals in primary health care," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 579-602, June.
    2. Valentinov, Vladislav & Pies, Ingo & Schultz, Felix Carl, 2026. "Transactions and relationships in stakeholder theory: A Luhmannian view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    3. Jill Kickul & Lisa K. Gundry & Saulo D. Barbosa & Laney Whitcanack, 2009. "Intuition versus Analysis? Testing Differential Models of Cognitive Style on Entrepreneurial Self–Efficacy and the New Venture Creation Process," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(2), pages 439-453, March.
    4. Yahua Cai & Liangding Jia & Juexing Li, 2017. "Dual-level transformational leadership and team information elaboration: The mediating role of relationship conflict and moderating role of middle way thinking," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 399-421, June.
    5. Fariborz Rahimnia & Mohammad Sharifirad, 2015. "Authentic Leadership and Employee Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Attachment Insecurity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 363-377, December.
    6. repec:osf:socarx:sv9de_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. John R. Hauser & Glen L. Urban & Guilherme Liberali & Michael Braun, 2009. "Website Morphing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 202-223, 03-04.
    8. Silvia Raffaldi & Paola Iannello & Laura Vittani & Alessandro Antonietti, 2012. "Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace," SAGE Open, , vol. 2(2), pages 21582440124, May.
    9. Mahajan, Manoj & Chan, C. S. Richard & Parhankangas, Annaleena, 2023. "Processing preferences and crowdfunding pitch evaluations," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    10. Michele Pinelli & Luca Pistilli & Alessio Cozzolino, 2025. "Developing the Entrepreneurial Paradox Mindset: The Role of Startup Accelerators and Educational Programs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 49(6), pages 1633-1668, November.
    11. Elisabet Ruiz-Dotras & Josep Lladós-Masllorens, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy and Financial and Calculation Skills Can Shape Different Profiles of Venture Intentions," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 153-183, March.
    12. Yannan Leng & Jiangang Wang & Xinlei Li, 2025. "Examining the Relationship Between College Students’ Proactive Personality and Entrepreneurial Decision: The Mediating Effects of Entrepreneurial Awareness-Motivation-Capability," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    13. Peter Tsasis & Jenna M. Evans & Linda Rush & John Diamond, 2013. "Learning to Learn: towards a Relational and Transformational Model of Learning for Improved Integrated Care Delivery," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Kevin Groves & Charles Vance & Yongsun Paik, 2008. "Linking Linear/Nonlinear Thinking Style Balance and Managerial Ethical Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 305-325, June.
    15. Dominik Mahr & Aric Rindfleisch & Rebecca Slotegraaf, 2015. "Enhancing Crowdsourcing Success: the Role of Creative and Deliberate Problem-Solving Styles," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(3), pages 209-221, September.
    16. Marco Caliendo & Daniel Rodríguez, 2024. "Divergent thinking and post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes: non-linearities and the moderating role of experience," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1523-1553, April.
    17. Barbara Weißenberger & Gero Holthoff, 2013. "Cognitive style and connotative meaning in management accounting communication," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Qi Li & Qiang Jiang & Jyh-Chong Liang & Weiyan Xiong & Wei Zhao, 2025. "Roles of programming self-efficacy, cognitive styles, and self-regulated learning strategies on computational thinking in computer programming," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Matt Andrews, 2013. "How do Governments get Great?," CID Working Papers 260, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    20. Mohammad Salman Shabbir & Mohd Noor Mohd Shariff & Arfan Shahzad, 2016. "Determinants of Entrepreneurial Skills set in Pakistan: A Pilot Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 76-86, April.
    21. Guilherme Azevedo, 2024. "The Interpretation of Organizational Ontologies," Post-Print hal-03976130, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:akf:cafewp:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Research Publications Librarian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bsuceuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.