IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/355987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extensive margin effects following the Japan-EU free trade agreement: analysing future developments in the agri-food sector

Author

Listed:
  • Berndt, Marvin
  • Hess, Sebastian

Abstract

Purpose. This study develops a model to predict and analyse the potential impacts of the Japan-EU Free Trade Agreement (JEFTA) on EU-Japan agri-food trade by focusing on the extensive margin of trade. The model identifies emerging and disappearing trade flows and evaluates their implications for the future total trade volume between the two regions. This was done in order to obtain trade volume predictions that are more disaggregated for agri-food products than in previous studies. Methodology / approach. The extensive margin model by Felbermayr and Kohler (2010) is used in conjunction with an econometric gravity trade model to create a new two-step forecast procedure. This procedure can be used to predict the emergence of new trade flows between the two countries, as well as their disappearance. Results. Aggregate changes in the extensive margin appear modest, but significant changes occur when new and disappearing trade flows are being considered separately. Overall, EU agri-food exports to Japan are predicted to increase by USD 2127 million by 2038. When emerging and disappearing trade flows are expressly considered, the predicted increase of EU agri-food exports is USD 7 million lower. Behind this overall change in the forecast is a much greater change at the level of individual trade flows: emerging trade flows are estimated to contribute USD 112 million in new exports to Japan by 2038, while disappearing trade flows total to USD 119 million. The majority of these changes are characterised by trade flows of less than USD 50,000 each. Originality / scientific novelty. This study presents a methodological advancement in trade forecasting by integrating the extensive margin model by Felbermayr and Kohler (2010) with an econometric gravity trade model in a two-step prediction process for the Japan-EU Free Trade Agreement. Detailed findings on emerging and disappearing trade flows indicate that previous forecasts based on more aggregate data may overlook crucial developments at the level of individual agri-food products. Practical value / implications. The findings emphasise the importance of considering the extensive margin in FTA evaluations. Policymakers and firms may misjudge trade opportunities without accounting for new and disappearing trade flows, highlighting the need for comprehensive sectoral trade strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Berndt, Marvin & Hess, Sebastian, 2024. "Extensive margin effects following the Japan-EU free trade agreement: analysing future developments in the agri-food sector," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(4), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355987
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355987/files/1_Berndt_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355987?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Kimura, Fukunari & Okubo, Toshihiro & Steininger, Marina, 2019. "Quantifying the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 110-128.
    2. Timothy J. Kehoe & Kim J. Ruhl, 2013. "How Important Is the New Goods Margin in International Trade?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 121(2), pages 358-392.
    3. Egger, Peter & Larch, Mario, 2008. "Interdependent preferential trade agreement memberships: An empirical analysis," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 384-399, December.
    4. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    5. Marc J. Melitz, 2003. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(6), pages 1695-1725, November.
    6. Jesse Mora & Michael Olabisi, 2021. "Economic Development And The Margins Of Trade: Are The Least Developed Countries Different?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 59(2), pages 600-621, April.
    7. John Baldwin & Beiling Yan, 2012. "Market Expansion and Productivity Growth: Do New Domestic Markets Matter as Much as New International Markets?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 469-491, June.
    8. Santos Silva, J.M.C. & Tenreyro, Silvana, 2011. "Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 220-222, August.
    9. Matsumoto, Takao & Chen, Yijun & Nakatsuka, Akihiro & Wang, Qunzhi, 2020. "Research on horizontal system model for food factories: A case study of process cheese manufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Feng, Michael, 2014. "Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 339-350.
    11. Alberto Amurgo-Pacheco, Martha Denisse Pierola, 2007. "Patterns of export diversification in developing countries: intensive and extensive margins," IHEID Working Papers 20-2007, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Jul 2007.
    12. Hsu, Robert C, 1972. "Changing Domestic Demand and Ability to Export," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 80(1), pages 198-202, Jan.-Feb..
    13. David Hummels & Peter J. Klenow, 2005. "The Variety and Quality of a Nation's Exports," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(3), pages 704-723, June.
    14. Maddalena Conte & Pierre Cotterlaz & Thierry Mayer, 2022. "The CEPII Gravity Database," Working Papers 2022-05, CEPII research center.
    15. Margherita Scoppola & Valentina Raimondi & Alessandro Olper, 2018. "The impact of EU trade preferences on the extensive and intensive margins of agricultural and food products," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(2), pages 251-263, March.
    16. Robert C. Feenstra & Hong Ma, 2014. "Trade Facilitation and the Extensive Margin of Exports," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 65(2), pages 158-177, June.
    17. Pelikan, Janine & Brockmeier, Martina, 2008. "Methods to Aggregate Import Tariffs and their Impacts on Modeling Results," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 23, pages 685-708.
    18. Daryl Pregibon, 1980. "Goodness of Link Tests for Generalized Linear Models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(1), pages 15-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McDougall, Brendan S. & Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku, 2020. "The Effect of Free Trade Agreements on the Intensive and Extensive Margins of Canadian Agri-Food Trade," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304486, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Baier, Scott L. & Yotov, Yoto V. & Zylkin, Thomas, 2019. "On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: Lessons from twenty years of trade integration," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 206-226.
    3. Machado, José A.F. & Santos Silva, J.M.C. & Wei, Kehai, 2016. "Quantiles, corners, and the extensive margin of trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 73-84.
    4. Katharina Längle, 2020. "Upgrading of Exports: Does the Integration into Trade Agreements Pave the Way to Product Upgrading?," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 20006, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Rod Falvey & Neil Foster-McGregor, 2022. "The breadth of preferential trade agreements and the margins of exports," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(1), pages 181-251, February.
    6. Cheong, Juyoung, 2023. "Do preferential trade agreements stimulate high-tech exports for low-income countries?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Imad Kareem Alaamshani & Hanny Zurina Hamzah & Shivee Ranjanee Kaliappan & Normaz Wana Ismail, 2021. "Impact of Trade Facilitation on Extensive Margin," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 131-147.
    8. Katharina Längle, 2020. "Upgrading of Exports: Does the Integration into Trade Agreements Pave the Way to Product Upgrading?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-02548689, HAL.
    9. Katharina Längle, 2020. "Upgrading of Exports: Does the Integration into Trade Agreements Pave the Way to Product Upgrading?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02899973, HAL.
    10. Ana Cecília Fieler & Jonathan Eaton, 2025. "The Margins of Trade," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(1), pages 129-160, January.
    11. Katharina Längle, 2020. "Upgrading of Exports: Does the Integration into Trade Agreements Pave the Way to Product Upgrading?," Post-Print halshs-02899973, HAL.
    12. Dick Nuwamanya Kamuganga, 2012. "The Linkage between Outcome Differences in Cotton Production and Rural Roads Improvements - A Matching Approach," IHEID Working Papers 15-2012, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    13. (ed.), 0. "Research Handbook on Economic Diplomacy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16053.
    14. Katharina Längle, 2020. "Upgrading of Exports: Does the Integration into Trade Agreements Pave the Way to Product Upgrading?," Working Papers hal-02548689, HAL.
    15. Oubeid Rahmouni, 2020. "The Impact of the Geographical Diversification of Saudi Exports: An Intensive and Extensive Margin Approach," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(10), pages 1077-1087, October.
    16. Elhanan Helpman & Marc Melitz & Yona Rubinstein, 2008. "Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 123(2), pages 441-487.
    17. Carl Gaigné & Lota D. Tamini, 2021. "Environmental Taxation and Import Demand for Environmental Goods: Theory and Evidence from the European Union," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(2), pages 307-352, February.
    18. Juyoung Cheong & Do Won Kwak & Kam Ki Tang, 2015. "Can Trade Agreements Curtail Trade Creation and Prevent Trade Diversion?," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 221-238, May.
    19. Juyoung Cheong & Do Won Kwak & Kam Ki Tang, 2016. "The distance effects on the intensive and extensive margins of trade over time," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 253-278, March.
    20. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Feng, Michael, 2014. "Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 339-350.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Finance; Financial Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.