IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aareaj/117286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the need for more economic assessment of quarantine/SPS policies

Author

Listed:
  • James, Sallie
  • Anderson, Kym

Abstract

Quarantine policy reviews are becoming more sophisticated yet they still focus primarily on the effects of restrictions solely on import‐competing producers. A fuller analysis that includes the consumers demonstrates that even if imported diseases were to wipe out a local industry, the gains to consumers might outweigh the losses to import‐competing producers from removing a ban on imports. This article provides the simplest partial equilibrium framework for thinking more about the economics of quarantine policy measures using an empirical analysis of Australia’s ban on imports of bananas.

Suggested Citation

  • James, Sallie & Anderson, Kym, 1998. "On the need for more economic assessment of quarantine/SPS policies," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(4), pages 1-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:117286
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.117286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/117286/files/1467-8489.00061.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.117286?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MacLaren, D., 1995. "Uncertainty AVersion and Technical Barriers to Trade: An Australian Example," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 498, The University of Melbourne.
    2. Roberts, Donna & DeRemer, Kate, 1997. "Overview of Foreign Technical Barriers to U.S. Agricultural Exports," Staff Reports 278821, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. K.W. Clements & L.A. Sjaastad, 1983. "How Protection Taxes Exporters," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 83-15, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    4. Anderson, Kym, 1998. "Are resource-abundant economies disadvantaged?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(1), pages 1-23.
    5. Tanner, Carolyn & Nairn, Malcolm, 1997. "Principles of Australian Quarantine," 1997 Conference (41st), January 22-24, 1997, Gold Coast, Australia 135413, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Stuckey, John A. & Anderson, Jock R., 1974. "Demand Analysis of the Sydney Banana Market," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(01), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niemi, Jyrki S. & Peltola, Jukka & Simola, Antti, 2008. "Technical Barrier Effects of a Food Safety Measure – a Case of Finnish Salmonella Control Program," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43953, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Clements, Kenneth W. & Fry, Renée, 2008. "Commodity currencies and currency commodities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 55-73, June.
    3. Eva Pardos & José-Ma Serrano-Sanz, 2002. "The Incidence of Protection on Exports: The Case of Spain, 1870–1913," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 183-203, April.
    4. Unknown, 1987. "Building on Success: Agricultural Research, Technology, and Policy for Development; Report of a symposium held at Canberra 14 May 1987," Technical Reports 113878, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    5. L.A. Sjaastad, 1991. "PPP and the Real Exchange Rate: The Swiss case," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 91-24, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    6. Calvin, Linda & Krissoff, Barry, 1998. "Technical Barriers To Trade: A Case Study Of Phytosanitary Barriers And U.S. - Japanese Apple Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-16, December.
    7. K.W. Clements, 1986. "The Computational Economics Projects at UWA: A review," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 86-08, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    8. Rae, Allan N., 2014. "What’s wrong with being an agricultural economy?," 2014 Conference, August 28-29, 2014, Nelson, New Zealand 187403, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Xia, Tian & Weyerbrock, Silvia, 1998. "Veterinary Standards As Barriers To Trade: The Case Of Poultry Trade Between The U.S. And The Eu," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20924, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. K.H. Choi, 1985. "Who Pays for Protection in Australia?," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 85-09, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    11. Edward Barbier, 1999. "Endogenous Growth and Natural Resource Scarcity," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 14(1), pages 51-74, July.
    12. A. Petridis, 1984. "Prospects for the Australian Economy in 1984," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 60(1), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Cook, David C., 2000. "An Economic Evaluation of the Benefits from Import Clearance Activities in Western Australia," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123628, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    14. Omar H. M. N. Bashar & Omar K. M. R. Bashar, 2020. "Resource abundance, financial crisis and economic growth: did resource‐rich countries fare better during the global financial crisis?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(2), pages 376-395, April.
    15. Sjaastad, Larry A. & Manzur, Meher, 2003. "Import Protection, Capital Flows, and Real Exchange Rate Dynamics," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 6(1), pages 1-27, May.
    16. Leamer, Edward E. & Maul, Hugo & Rodriguez, Sergio & Schott, Peter K., 1999. "Does natural resource abundance increase Latin American income inequality?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 3-42, June.
    17. Kramb, M.C., 2001. "Eine ökonomische Analyse von sanitären und phytosanitären Außenhandelsmaßnahmen am Beispiel des „Hormonstreites“ zwischen der EU und den USA," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 37.
    18. Snape, Richard H., 1988. "Real Exchange Rates, Real Interest Rates and Agriculture," 1988 Conference, August 24-31, 1988, Buenos Aires, Argentina 183148, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. repec:kap:iaecre:v:11:y:2005:i:4:p:417-432 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Davis, Graham A, 1998. "The minerals sector, sectoral analysis, and economic development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 217-228, December.
    21. Njinkeu, Dominique, 1996. "Evaluation of the incentive structure: A survey and application to Cameroon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 557-568, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:117286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.