IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icmbdj/v1y2015i1p366-376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family Firms’ CSR Actions: the Case of Barilla

Author

Listed:
  • Domenico Morrone

    (LUM Jean Monnet University)

  • Angeloantonio Russo

    (LUM Jean Monnet University)

  • Donato Calace

    (LUM Jean Monnet University)

Abstract

The development and implementation of CSR oriented strategies is a common trait in modern organizations. As public authorities, customers, suppliers and the wider stakeholder community call for a more socially and environmentally responsible way of doing business, companies commit themselves in actions signaling their sustainable style of management. The publication of non-financial reports, the adoption of ethic codes, the granting of international standards and certifications (such as ISO 14001 or SA 8000) are some examples of actions in this direction. Still, the effectiveness of this commitment in terms of the enactment of corporate sustainability is questionable. Being the attainment of reputation and legitimacy the main driver behind such practices, in a socio-political perspective the appearance rather than the fact of conformity is often sufficient to create the image of a sustainable company, the so-called greenwashing. For this reason, these actions are frequently relegated to a symbolic management domain, failing to provide any proof of triggering substantial managerial acts. In this context, the presence of a sustainability-committed management can evidently play a critical role for CSR actions to generate actual and deep organizational change. In particular, relevant literature provides evidence of the relationship between family firms (that are firms where members of the founding family continue to remain as significant company shareholders and/or are in senior management positions or hold a seat on the board of directors) and socially responsible behavior. Indeed, family firms founders consider their business as an extension of their personal lives, including non-economic reasons and goals in their style of management. Through an exploratory case study of the worldwide famous Italian pasta maker, Barilla, and its sustainability reporting process this study gives an original contribution to the debate regarding the implications of corporate ownerships structures, investigating how the intersection of two principal institutions (business and family) moderates the relationship between CSR actions and substantial management.

Suggested Citation

  • Domenico Morrone & Angeloantonio Russo & Donato Calace, 2015. "Family Firms’ CSR Actions: the Case of Barilla," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 366-376, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:icmbdj:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:366-376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mbd.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/icmbdj/2015/ICMBDJ_V1_2015_145.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Milne & Rob Gray, 2013. "W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 13-29, November.
    2. Preston, Lee E, 1975. "Corporation and Society: The Search for a Paradigm," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 434-453, June.
    3. Antonio Tencati & Angeloantonio Russo & Victoria Quaglia, 2010. "Sustainability along the global supply chain: the case of Vietnam," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 91-107, March.
    4. Jean-Pascal Gond & Olivier Herrbach, 2006. "Social Reporting as an Organisational Learning Tool? A Theoretical Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 359-371, June.
    5. Henry Mintzberg, 1990. "The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 171-195, March.
    6. Henry Mintzberg & James A. Waters, 1985. "Of strategies, deliberate and emergent," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 257-272, July.
    7. Perrini, Francesco, 2005. "Building a European Portrait of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 611-627, December.
    8. Simons, Robert, 1990. "The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 127-143.
    9. Donato Calace, 2014. "Non-Financial Reporting in Italian SMEs: An Exploratory Study on Strategic and Cultural Motivations," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 34-48, May.
    10. W. Gibb Dyer Jr. & David A. Whetten, 2006. "Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P 500," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(6), pages 785-802, November.
    11. Itziar Castelló & Mette Morsing & Friederike Schultz, 2013. "Communicative Dynamics and the Polyphony of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Network Society," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(4), pages 683-694, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Byrne & Donncha Kavanagh, 1996. "Strategic Environmental Management In The Irish Chemical/Pharmaceutical Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 106-114, June.
    2. Mark Fuller, 2022. "Wheat and chaff: the degree to which strategic management principles are integrated within corporate social responsibility reporting among large Canadian firms," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Adler, Ralph W., 2011. "Performance management and organizational strategy: How to design systems that meet the needs of confrontation strategy firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 251-263.
    4. Eric Guthey & Mette Morsing, 2014. "CSR and the Mediated Emergence of Strategic Ambiguity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 555-569, April.
    5. Jeffrey G. Covin & Kimberly M. Green & Dennis P. Slevin, 2006. "Strategic Process Effects on the Entrepreneurial Orientation–Sales Growth Rate Relationship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(1), pages 57-81, January.
    6. Iván A. Montoya Restrepo, 2009. "La formación de la estrategia en Mintzberg y las posibilidades de su aportación para el futuro," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, December.
    7. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-103, January.
    8. Ouakouak, Mohamed Laid & Ouedraogo, Noufou & Mbengue, Ababacar, 2014. "The mediating role of organizational capabilities in the relationship between middle managers’ involvement and firm performance: A European study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 305-318.
    9. Roth, Victoria, 2021. "Talking is Silver, Doing is Gold? – The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(3), pages 637-672.
    10. Journeault, Marc & De Rongé, Yves & Henri, Jean-François, 2016. "Levers of eco-control and competitive environmental strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 316-340.
    11. Dan Lovallo & Olivier Sibony, 2018. "Broadening the Frame: How Behavioral Strategy Redefines Strategic Decisions," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 658-667, December.
    12. Erhart, Raphaela & Mahlendorf, Matthias D. & Reimer, Marko & Schäffer, Utz, 2017. "Theorizing and testing bidirectional effects: The relationship between strategy formation and involvement of controllers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 36-52.
    13. Paolo Collini & Maria Laura Frigotto, 2013. "Management Control Systems for exploration? A paradox and a challenge for research," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 27-44.
    14. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Brownell, Peter, 1999. "The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 189-204, April.
    15. Alfredo De Massis & Kimberly A. Eddleston & Paola Rovelli, 2021. "Entrepreneurial by Design: How Organizational Design Affects Family and Non‐family Firms’ Opportunity Exploitation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 27-62, January.
    16. Grégory Wegmann, 2001. "Les Tableaux De Bord Strategiques : Une Instrumentation Du Controle De Gestion Strategique Concepts, Instrumentation Et Enquete," Post-Print halshs-00584660, HAL.
    17. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 529-558, August.
    18. Pier Luigi Marchini & Luca Fornaciari, 2016. "The increasing relevance of managing costs of poor quality (CoPQ). The case of the mineral water industry," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(3), pages 65-96.
    19. Ma, Liangbo, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility reporting in family firms: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    20. Steensen, Elmer Fly, 2014. "Five types of organizational strategy," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 266-281.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CSR; Family Business; Sustainability Reporting; Substantial Management.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icmbdj:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:366-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.