IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v27y2025i68p145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating Employment Transformations: Liberalism vs. Statism in the Era of Industry 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Chuanlin Wang,

    (Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, China)

  • Guowan Yan

    (Chongqing University, Chongqing, China)

  • Jing Yang

    (Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China)

Abstract

Industrial Revolution 4.0, with its emphasis on smart manufacturing, has a profound impact on traditional employment. This study aims to examine changes in firms employment decisions in the context of Industry 4.0, shedding light on the conflict between liberalism's market mechanisms and statism's government interventions. Given China s status as the world s largest emerging market, its unique politico economic structure and the global technological transformation of Industry 4.0 jointly shape a dynamic labor market that requires a balance between government intervention and market forces. Using a sample of publicly listed Chinese companies from 2007 to 2022, we employ a difference-in-differences (DID) approach and ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation to empirically investigate changes in firms labor demand under Industry 4.0. To ensure robustness, we perform several other analyses, including parallel trend tests and placebo tests. Our results indicate that Industry 4.0 reduces the overall labor demand of firms, characterized by a decrease in low-skilled workers and an increase in high-skilled workers. Furthermore, a triple difference model reveals that market forces exacerbate the negative employment effects of Industry 4.0, whereas government interventions mitigate these effects to some extent. Our findings offer a new perspective on how Industry 4.0 influences the employment market within the frameworks of statism and liberalism. It also proposes a potential resolution to the conflict between liberalism and statism in the context of Industry 4.0, while providing valuable insight into corporate employment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuanlin Wang, & Guowan Yan & Jing Yang, 2025. "Navigating Employment Transformations: Liberalism vs. Statism in the Era of Industry 4.0," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(68), pages 145-145, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:68:p:145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3390.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    2. Alberto Alesina & Michele Battisti & Joseph Zeira, 2018. "Technology and labor regulations: theory and evidence," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 41-78, March.
    3. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(6), pages 1488-1542, June.
    4. Gustavo Manso, 2011. "Motivating Innovation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(5), pages 1823-1860, October.
    5. Kory Kroft & Matthew J. Notowidigdo, 2016. "Should Unemployment Insurance Vary with the Unemployment Rate? Theory and Evidence," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 83(3), pages 1092-1124.
    6. Ying Hao & Jing Lu, 2018. "The Impact of Government Intervention on Corporate Investment Allocations and Efficiency: Evidence from China," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 47(2), pages 383-419, June.
    7. Daniel Bradley & Incheol Kim & Xuan Tian, 2017. "Do Unions Affect Innovation?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2251-2271, July.
    8. Prabhat Barnwal, 2024. "Curbing Leakage in Public Programs: Evidence from India's Direct Benefit Transfer Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(12), pages 3812-3846, December.
    9. Aras Zirgulis & Tadas Šarapovas, 2017. "Impact of corporate taxation on unemployment," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 412-426, May.
    10. Chiara Criscuolo & Ralf Martin & Henry G. Overman & John Van Reenen, 2019. "Some Causal Effects of an Industrial Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(1), pages 48-85, January.
    11. Horst Feldmann, 2008. "Business regulation and labor market performance around the world," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 201-235, April.
    12. Bettiol, Marco & Capestro, Mauro & Di Maria, Eleonora & Ganau, Roberto, 2024. "Is this time different?: how Industry 4.0 affects firms' labor productivity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124545, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Du, Jun & Mickiewicz, Tomasz, 2016. "Subsidies, rent seeking and performance: Being young, small or private in China," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 22-38.
    14. James Bessen, 2019. "Automation and jobs: when technology boosts employment," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 34(100), pages 589-626.
    15. Ruitao Li & Chuanxian Li & Shijun Guo, 2024. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Labor Market: Evidence from China," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(67), pages 867-867, August.
    16. Clara Xiaoling Chen & Hai Lu & Theodore Sougiannis, 2012. "The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 252-282, March.
    17. Liu, Guanchun & Liu, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Chengsi, 2022. "Tax enforcement and corporate employment: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Vivian W. Fang & Xuan Tian & Sheri Tice, 2014. "Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(5), pages 2085-2125, October.
    19. Marco Bettiol & Mauro Capestro & Eleonora Di Maria & Roberto Ganau, 2024. "Is this time different? How Industry 4.0 affects firms’ labor productivity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1449-1467, April.
    20. Niels Hermes & Robert Lensink, 2003. "Foreign direct investment, financial development and economic growth," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 142-163.
    21. Toorajipour, Reza & Sohrabpour, Vahid & Nazarpour, Ali & Oghazi, Pejvak & Fischl, Maria, 2021. "Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 502-517.
    22. Paul Cammack, 2012. "The G20, the Crisis, and the Rise of Global Developmental Liberalism," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1-16.
    23. Grybauskas, Andrius & Stefanini, Alessandro & Ghobakhloo, Morteza, 2022. "Social sustainability in the age of digitalization: A systematic literature Review on the social implications of industry 4.0," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    24. Yi Lu & Jin Wang & Lianming Zhu, 2019. "Place-Based Policies, Creation, and Agglomeration Economies: Evidence from China's Economic Zone Program," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 325-360, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schneider, Florian, 2024. "Do robots boost productivity? A quantitative meta-study," MPRA Paper 123392, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Yan Liu & Qiuju He, 2024. "Digital transformation, external financing, and enterprise resource allocation efficiency," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 2321-2335, June.
    3. Roberto Antonietti & Luca Cattani & Francesca Gambarotto & Giulio Pedrini, 2021. "Education, routine, and complexity-biased Knowledge Enabling Technologies: Evidence from Emilia-Romagna, Italy," Discussion Paper series in Regional Science & Economic Geography 2021-07, Gran Sasso Science Institute, Social Sciences, revised May 2021.
    4. Liu, Ying & Liu, Steve & Wu, Ziqi & Xiao, Yi, 2022. "How do technological innovations affect corporate investment and hiring?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Wang, Jimin & Ho, Choy Yeing (Chloe) & Shan, Yuan George, 2024. "Does cybersecurity risk stifle corporate innovation activities?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Moshirian, Fariborz & Tian, Xuan & Zhang, Bohui & Zhang, Wenrui, 2021. "Stock market liberalization and innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 985-1014.
    7. Guimarães, Luís & Mazeda Gil, Pedro, 2022. "Explaining the Labor Share: Automation Vs Labor Market Institutions," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Tsang, Albert & Wang, Kun Tracy & Liu, Simeng & Yu, Li, 2021. "Integrating corporate social responsibility criteria into executive compensation and firm innovation: International evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Linh Thompson, 2024. "Employee health and corporate innovation: Evidence from medical cannabis legalisation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(4), pages 3927-3950, December.
    10. Du, Junhong & He, Jiajia & Yang, Jing & Chen, Xiaohong, 2024. "How industrial robots affect labor income share in task model: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    11. Tianru Qin & Lin Liang & Peng Liang & Wenqun Liang, 2025. "Can industrial robot utilization drive the total factor productivity of enterprises?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(1), pages 129-148, January.
    12. Zuanjiu Zhou & Zhong Liu, 2023. "The Impact of Place-Based Policies on Firm Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Francis, Bill & Mani, Suresh Babu & Sharma, Zenu & Wu, Qiang, 2021. "The impact of organization capital on firm innovation," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    14. Cao, Yuqiang & Hu, Yong & Liu, Qian & Lu, Meiting & Shan, Yaowen, 2023. "Job creation or disruption? Unraveling the effects of smart city construction on corporate employment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    15. Sagarika Mishra & Michael T. Ewing & Holly B. Cooper, 2022. "Artificial intelligence focus and firm performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1176-1197, November.
    16. Li, Tao & Wang, Yan, 2022. "Corporate responsibility towards employees and innovation: Evidence from an emerging market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Yongqiang Chu & Xuan Tian & Wenyu Wang, 2019. "Corporate Innovation Along the Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2445-2466, June.
    18. Stefan Jestl, 2022. "Industrial Robots, and Information and Communication Technology: The Employment Effects in EU Labour Markets," wiiw Working Papers 215, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    19. Guimarães, Luís & Mazeda Gil, Pedro, 2022. "Looking ahead at the effects of automation in an economy with matching frictions," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    20. Hasan, Iftekhar & (Stan) Hoi, Chun-Keung & Wu, Qiang & Zhang, Hao, 2020. "Is social capital associated with corporate innovation? Evidence from publicly listed firms in the U.S," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industry 4.0; Employment; Liberalism; Statism.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • J2 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor
    • P0 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:68:p:145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.