This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Repetition And Financial Incentives In Economics Experiments Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Jinkwon Lee
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
While experimental methods have been an effective tool for economic research, there have been controversies on the methodological aspects. The reason why we need to care about it is clear: if the method in an experiment is not valid, the results from that experiment cannot be valid too. Among other things, the methodological issues of financial incentives and repetition, which are norms in experimental economics, have been at the centre of many debates. While there are previous reviews that investigate financial incentives and repetition separately, our view is that the effects of these two factors are interdependent rather than independent. Thus, our review here is more specific and more conditional, that is, we are interested in the answer to the question, 'Do we need to use financial incentives conditional on the use of repetition?' After we discuss the relationship between financial incentives and repetition, we argue, from a review of 44 experimental studies, that using financial incentives would be more necessary to improve the validity of experimental results if an experimenter needs to use repetition. Copyright 2007 The Author Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by Blackwell Publishing in its journal Journal of Economic Surveys .
Volume (Year): 21 (2007)
Issue (Month): 3 (07)
Pages: 628-681
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:21:y:2007:i:3:p:628-681Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804
Order Information: Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0950-0804
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords: Cited by : (explanations , Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Jinkwon Lee, 2008.
"The effect of the background risk in a simple chance improving decision model ,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,
Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 19-41, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Access and
download statistics Did you know? Want to help out with this project? Look for volunteer opportunities .
This page was last updated on 2009-12-21.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .