IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/fth/tilbur/9306.html

The Consistency Principle for Games in Strategic Form

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Dufwenberg, M. & Norde, H.W. & Reijnierse, J.H. & Tijs, S.H., 1997. "The consistency principle for set-valued solutions and a new direction for the theory of equilibrium refinements," Discussion Paper 1997-34, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  2. Lee, SangMok, 2012. "The testable implications of zero-sum games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 39-46.
  3. P. Jean-Jacques Herings & Andrey Meshalkin & Arkadi Predtetchinski, 2020. "Optimality, Equilibrium, and Curb Sets in Decision Problems Without Commitment," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 478-492, June.
  4. Takuya Masuzawa, 2008. "Computing the cores of strategic games with punishment–dominance relations," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 37(2), pages 185-201, June.
  5. Peter Borm & Hans Peters, 2023. "Professor Stef Tijs (1937–2023)," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(4), pages 953-955, December.
  6. Stéphane Gonzalez & Aymeric Lardon, 2018. "Axiomatic foundations of a unifying concept of the core of games in effectiveness form," Post-Print halshs-01902122, HAL.
  7. İpek Özkal-Sanver, 2013. "Minimal conversely consistent extension of the men-optimal solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(1), pages 89-99, January.
  8. Zenou, Yves & Dequiedt, Vianney, 2014. "Local and Consistent Centrality Measures in Networks," Research Papers in Economics 2014:4, Stockholm University, Department of Economics.
  9. Martin Meier & Burkhard Schipper, 2014. "Bayesian games with unawareness and unawareness perfection," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 56(2), pages 219-249, June.
  10. Ignacio Palacios-Huerta & Oscar Volij, 2002. "The Measure of Intellectual Influence," Working Papers 2002-13, Brown University, Department of Economics.
  11. Florian Brandl & Felix Brandt, 2023. "A Robust Characterization of Nash Equilibrium," Papers 2307.03079, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
  12. Kets, W., 2008. "Networks and learning in game theory," Other publications TiSEM 7713fce1-3131-498c-8c6f-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  13. Voorneveld, Mark, 2002. "Preparation and toolkit learning," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 485, Stockholm School of Economics.
  14. E. Miglierina & E. Molho & F. Patrone & S. Tijs, 2008. "Axiomatic approach to approximate solutions in multiobjective optimization," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 31(2), pages 95-115, November.
  15. Voorneveld, Mark, 2004. "Preparation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 403-414, August.
  16. Ray, Indrajit & Zhou, Lin, 2001. "Game Theory via Revealed Preferences," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 415-424, November.
  17. Anne van den Nouweland & Myrna H. Wooders & S. Tijs, 2002. "Axiomatization of ratio equilibria in public good economies," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 19(3), pages 627-636.
  18. Rebelo, S., 1997. "On the Determinant of Economic Growth," RCER Working Papers 443, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  19. Gonzalez, Stéphane & Lardon, Aymeric, 2021. "Axiomatic foundations of the core for games in effectiveness form," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 28-38.
  20. Michele Crescenzi, 2025. "A choice-based axiomatization of Nash equilibrium," Papers 2512.03930, arXiv.org.
  21. Koji Takamiya, 2006. "Consistency and Unanimity in the House Allocation Problems I: Collective Initial Endowments," ISER Discussion Paper 0657, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
  22. Voorneveld, M. & van den Nouweland, C.G.A.M., 1998. "Cooperative Multicriteria Games with Public and Private Criteria : An Investigation of Core Concepts," Discussion Paper 1998-62, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  23. Voorneveld, M. & van den Nouweland, C.G.A.M., 1998. "Cooperative Multicriteria Games with Public and Private Criteria : An Investigation of Core Concepts," Other publications TiSEM 8c732445-5aa9-445f-9564-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  24. Miglierina Enrico & Molho Elena & Patrone Fioravante & Steff H. Tijs, 2005. "An axiomatic approach to approximate solutions in vector optimization," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf0507, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
  25. Mark Voorneveld & Willemien Kets & Henk Norde, 2006. "An Axiomatization of Minimal Curb Sets," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 34(1), pages 153-153, April.
  26. Dequiedt, Vianney & Zenou, Yves, 2017. "Local and consistent centrality measures in parameterized networks," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 28-36.
  27. William Thomson, 2011. "Consistency and its converse: an introduction," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 15(4), pages 257-291, December.
  28. Voorneveld, Mark, 2019. "An axiomatization of the Nash equilibrium concept," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 316-321.
  29. Siegfried Berninghaus & Werner G³th & Hartmut Kliemt, 2003. "Reflections on Equilibrium: Ideal Rationality and Analytic Decomposition of Games," Homo Oeconomicus, Institute of SocioEconomics, vol. 20, pages 257-302.
  30. Voorneveld, Mark, 2019. "An elementary axiomatization of the Nash equilibrium concept," SSE Working Paper Series in Economics 2019:1, Stockholm School of Economics.
  31. Dagan, Nir & Serrano, Roberto & Volij, Oscar, 1997. "A Noncooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 55-72, January.
  32. Voorneveld, Mark & Vermeulen, Dries & Borm, Peter, 1999. "Axiomatizations of Pareto Equilibria in Multicriteria Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 146-154, July.
  33. Peleg, Bezalel & Sudholter, Peter, 1997. "An Axiomatization of Nash Equilibria in Economic Situations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 277-285, February.
  34. Lee, Darin & Volij, Oscar, 2002. "The core of economies with asymmetric information: an axiomatic approach," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 43-63, September.
  35. Serrano, Roberto & Volij, Oscar, 1998. "Axiomatizations of neoclassical concepts for economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 87-108, August.
  36. Stéphane Gonzalez & Aymeric Lardon, 2018. "Axiomatic Foundations of a Unifying Core," Working Papers halshs-01930836, HAL.
  37. Werner Güth, 2002. "On the Inconsistency of Equilibrium Refinement," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 371-392, December.
  38. O'Neill, Barry, 2004. "Handbook of Game Theory, Vol. 3: Edited by Robert Aumann and Sergiu Hart, Elsevier, New York, 2002," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 215-218, January.
  39. Schroeder, Andreas, 2024. "A note on Brandl and Brandt’s axiomatic characterization of Nash equilibrium," MPRA Paper 123069, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  40. Nizamogullari, Duygu & Özkal-Sanver, İpek, 2014. "Characterization of the core in full domain marriage problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 34-42.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.