IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/umiodp/52012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Förderung von Wissenschaft zu nationalen und europäischen Fragen

Author

Listed:
  • Dilger, Alexander

Abstract

Die Forschung und in deren Folge auch die Lehre zu nationalen und europäischen Fragen und Problemen stehen vor einem Dilemma. In vielen Fächern findet die weltbeste Forschung nicht nur in den USA statt, sondern vor allem auch über die USA, ihre Fragestellungen und Probleme mit amerikanischen Daten und der Analyse ihrer Gegebenheiten und Institutionen. Wer also auf die weltbeste Spitzenforschung setzt, sei es als einzelner Forscher, Forschungseinrichtung oder Forschungsförderer, der blendet deutsche und europäische Fragestellungen besser aus. Die viel beschworene Internationalisierung ist dabei häufig eine reine Amerikanisierung. Der Gegenentwurf, z. B. deutsche Forschung nur von deutschen Forschern zu deutschen Themen und auch noch mit deutschen Methoden, führt jedoch zu Isolierung bis hin zu akademischer Inzucht mit dramatischen Folgen für die wissenschaftliche Anschlussfähigkeit und gegebenenfalls auch Qualität. Es ist deshalb der folgenden Mittelweg zu empfehlen: Die Forschung zu nationalen und europäischen Fragen unter Beachtung der hiesigen Gegebenheiten und mit hiesigen Daten wird da besonders gefördert, wo es auf nationale und kontinentale Unterschiede ankommt. Dagegen findet keine besondere Förderung in Abhängigkeit der Nationalität der Forschenden statt und sind die weltbesten Methoden der Forschung und Qualitätssicherung zu verwenden. Die Förderung kann projektbezogen erfolgen und besser noch institutionell, z. B. durch die Einrichtung entsprechender Lehrstühle, Institute, Cluster, Zeitschriften, Preise etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Dilger, Alexander, 2012. "Förderung von Wissenschaft zu nationalen und europäischen Fragen," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 5/2012, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:umiodp:52012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/58248/1/716263432.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. (ed.), 1992. "Index," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1241.
    2. Dilger, Alexander & Müller, Harry, 2011. "Ein Forschungsleistungsranking auf der Grundlage von Google Scholar," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 12/2011, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dilger, Alexander, 2016. "Herausforderungen der Flüchtlingskrise für Hochschulen," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 09/2016, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    2. Dilger, Alexander, 2017. "Vor- und Nachteile verschiedener Arten von Drittmitteln," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 4/2017, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Müller, Harry & Dilger, Alexander, 2013. "Der Einfluss des Forschungsschwerpunkts auf den Zitationserfolg: Eine empirische Untersuchung anhand der Gesamtpublikationen deutschsprachiger Hochschullehrer für BWL," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 1/2013, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    2. Müller, Harry & Dilger, Alexander, 2011. "Ein Ranking von Hochschulen und (Bundes-)Ländern am Beispiel der Betriebswirtschaftslehre," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 8/2011, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    3. Paul D. Gottlieb, 2011. "Supply or Demand, Make or Buy," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 25(4), pages 303-315, November.
    4. Dilger, Alexander, 2013. "Soll man das Handelsblatt-Ranking BWL boykottieren?," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 3/2013, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    5. Wakker, Peter P. & Zank, Horst, 2002. "A simple preference foundation of cumulative prospect theory with power utility," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1253-1271, July.
    6. Johnson, Shane A. & Tian, Yisong S., 2000. "The value and incentive effects of nontraditional executive stock option plans," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 3-34, July.
    7. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2015. "Geometric stopping of a random walk and its applications to valuing equity-linked death benefits," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 313-325.
    8. Müller, Harry, 2013. "Zur Ethik von Rankings im Hochschulwesen: Eine Betrachtung aus ökonomischer Perspektive," CIW Discussion Papers 1/2013, University of Münster, Center for Interdisciplinary Economics (CIW).
    9. Stephen Brown & William Goetzmann & Takato Hiraki & Noriyoshi Shiraishi & Masahiro Watanabe, 2002. "Investor Sentiment in Japanese and U.S. Daily Mutual Fund Flows," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm274, Yale School of Management, revised 01 Apr 2008.
    10. Adam Geršl & Tomáš Holub, 2006. "Foreign Exchange Interventions Under Inflation Targeting: The Czech Experience," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 24(4), pages 475-491, October.
    11. Jansen, Dennis W. & Koedijk, Kees G. & de Vries, Casper G., 2000. "Portfolio selection with limited downside risk," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(3-4), pages 247-269, November.
    12. James E. Anderson & J. Peter Neary, 2003. "The Mercantilist Index of Trade Policy," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 44(2), pages 627-649, May.
    13. Robert Brennan & Michael Kane, 1977. "Signal/noise ratios for domain-referenced tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(4), pages 609-625, December.
    14. Dilger, Alexander, 2017. "Sind gewählte Teamleiter besser als ihr Team? Analyse am Beispiel von BWL-Professoren und ihren Zitationen [Are elected team leaders better than their teams? Analysis at the example of management p," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 9/2017, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    15. Tian, Yisong S., 2013. "Ironing out the kinks in executive compensation: Linking incentive pay to average stock prices," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 415-432.
    16. Alexander Dilger & Laura Lütkenhöner & Harry Müller, 2015. "Scholars’ physical appearance, research performance, and feelings of happiness," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(2), pages 555-573, August.
    17. Mora, Ricardo & San Juan, Carlos, 2001. "Regional and farm specialisation in Spanish agriculture before and after integration in the European Union," UC3M Working papers. Economics we010401, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    18. Härdle, Wolfgang & Huet, Sylvie & Mammen, Enno & Sperlich, Stefan, 2004. "Bootstrap Inference In Semiparametric Generalized Additive Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 265-300, April.
    19. Anthony Chen & Chao Yang & Sirisak Kongsomsaksakul & Ming Lee, 2007. "Network-based Accessibility Measures for Vulnerability Analysis of Degradable Transportation Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 241-256, September.
    20. Demichelis, Stefano & Germano, Fabrizio, 2002. "On (un)knots and dynamics in games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 46-60, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • M51 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Firm Employment Decisions; Promotions
    • R10 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:umiodp:52012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilmuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.