IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/stuist/12014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Grundlagen der Theorie der Firma: Methodologie wissenschaftlicher Theorien

Author

Listed:
  • Frohwein, Torsten

Abstract

Die Firma ist zentrales Erkenntnisobjekt der strategischen Managementforschung. Die Firma und ihre theoretische Betrachtung sind aber auch Diskussionsobjekt. Die Gründe für letzteres sind vielfältig und reichen von unterschiedlichen Auffassungen von 'Theorie' und 'Firma'. Eine Theorie der Firma bedarf einer Klärung der Begriffe 'Theorie' und 'Firma'.

Suggested Citation

  • Frohwein, Torsten, 2014. "Grundlagen der Theorie der Firma: Methodologie wissenschaftlicher Theorien," Research Papers on Innovation, Services and Technology 1/2014, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Business Administration, Department I - Institute of Research & Development and Innovation Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:stuist:12014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/102030/1/796665184.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Barkley Rosser Jr. (ed.), 2009. "Handbook of Research on Complexity," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3625.
    2. Anju Seth & George Zinkhan, 1991. "Strategy and the research process: A comment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 75-82, January.
    3. Richard P. Rumelt & Dan Schendel & David J. Teece, 1991. "Strategic management and economics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S2), pages 5-29, December.
    4. Raza Mir & Andrew Watson, 2001. "Critical realism and constructivism in strategy research: toward a synthesis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(12), pages 1169-1173, December.
    5. Paul M. Hirsch & Ray Friedman & Mitchell P. Koza, 1990. "Collaboration or Paradigm Shift?: Caveat Emptor and the Risk of Romance with Economic Models for Strategy and Policy Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 87-97, February.
    6. Anju Seth & Howard Thomas, 1994. "Theories Of The Firm: Implications For Strategy Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 165-192, March.
    7. Cynthia A. Montgomery & Birger Wernerfelt & Srinivasan Balakrishnan, 1989. "Strategy content and the research process: A critique and commentary," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 189-197, March.
    8. Paul Nightingale, 2008. "Meta-paradigm change and the theory of the firm," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 17(3), pages 533-583, June.
    9. Cynthia A. Montgomery & Birger Wernerfelt & Srinivasan Balakrishnan, 1991. "Strategy and the research process: A reply," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 83-84, January.
    10. Colin Camerer, 1985. "Redirecting research in business policy and strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Kai‐Man Kwan & Eric W. K. Tsang, 2001. "Realism and constructivism in strategy research: a critical realist response to Mir and Watson," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(12), pages 1163-1168, December.
    12. Raza Mir & Andrew Watson, 2000. "Strategic management and the philosophy of science: the case for a constructivist methodology," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(9), pages 941-953, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Homburg, 2007. "Betriebswirtschaftslehre als Empirische Wissenschaft — Bestandsaufnahme und Empfehlungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(56), pages 27-60, January.
    2. M.-J. Avenier, 2010. "Retrouver l'Esprit de la vallée du Constructivisme en remontant à ses sources épistémiques," Post-Print halshs-00526755, HAL.
    3. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    4. Esthela Galván-Vela & Eduardo Arango Herrera & Deisy Milena Sorzano Rodríguez & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2021. "State-of-the-Art Analysis of Intrapreneurship: A Review of the Theoretical Construct and Its Bibliometrics," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Annacker, Dirk & Hildebrandt, Lutz, 2004. "Unobservable effects in structural models of business performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 507-517, May.
    6. Alain Charles Martinet, 2008. "50 ans de recherche en stratégie:normalisation ou pluralisme épistémologique ?," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(Special), pages 39-66, June.
    7. William B. Gartner, 2001. "Is There an Elephant in Entrepreneurship? Blind Assumptions in Theory Development," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 27-39, July.
    8. Michael Young & Terence Tsai & Xinran Wang & Shubo Liu & David Ahlstrom, 2014. "Strategy in emerging economies and the theory of the firm," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 331-354, June.
    9. Andrew L. Zacharakis, 1997. "Entrepreneurial Entry into Foreign Markets: A Transaction Cost Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 21(3), pages 23-40, April.
    10. Metzger Matthew L. & King Jesse S., 2015. "Extending Constructivist Perspectives on Opportunity Production Through An Incorporation of Effectual Logics," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 5(4), pages 323-345, October.
    11. Reitz, Stefan & Rülke, Jan & Stadtmann, Georg, 2012. "Nonlinear Expectations in Speculative Markets," VfS Annual Conference 2012 (Goettingen): New Approaches and Challenges for the Labor Market of the 21st Century 62045, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Reitz, Stefan & Rülke, Jan-Christoph & Stadtmann, Georg, 2012. "Nonlinear expectations in speculative markets – Evidence from the ECB survey of professional forecasters," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 1349-1363.
    13. Sofie Balcaen & Sophie Manigart & Hubert Ooghe, 2011. "From distress to exit: determinants of the time to exit," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 407-446, August.
    14. Peter E. Harland & Zakir Uddin & Sven Laudien, 2020. "Product platforms as a lever of competitive advantage on a company-wide level: a resource management perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 137-158, February.
    15. Colombo, Massimo G. & Garrone, Paola, 1998. "Common carriers' entry into multimedia services," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 77-105, March.
    16. Phillip H. Phan & John E. Butler, 2005. "Entrepreneurs' Attitudes, Strategy Choices, And Firm Performance," Industrial Organization 0506001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Pettus, Michael L. & Kor, Yasemin Y. & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2007. "A Theory of Change in Turbulent Environments: The Sequencing of Dynamic Capabilities Following Industry Deregulation," Working Papers 07-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    18. Fiet, James O., 2001. "The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, January.
    19. Koppl, Roger, 2010. "Some epistemological implications of economic complexity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 859-872, December.
    20. Richard Holt & J. Barkley Rosser & David Colander, 2011. "The Complexity Era in Economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 357-369.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Theorie der Firma; Theoriebildung;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:stuist:12014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwstude.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.