IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb597/175.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Das "PISA Phänomen": Ein Plädoyer für einen interdisziplinären Ansatz zur Erforschung von Bildungsproduktion im Kontext von Large-Scale-Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Martens, Kerstin
  • Breiter, Andreas
  • Idel, Till-Sebastian
  • Knipping, Christine
  • Teltemann, Janna

Abstract

International vergleichende Schulleistungsuntersuchungen wie das Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) der Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) oder die Internationale Grundschul-Leseuntersuchung (IGLU; englisch: Progress in International Reading Literacy Study/PIRLS) zeigen Schwächen und Stärken der Bildungssysteme teilnehmender Länder auf. Sie zielen darauf ab, die Produktionsleistung von Bildungssystemen messbar zu machen, und erlauben es, Bildungsansätze verschiedener Länder und Regionen bis auf die Ebene einzelner Schulen hinsichtlich ihrer Leistungskapazitäten zu quantifizieren und miteinander zu vergleichen. In diesem Beitrag argumentieren wir für eine interdisziplinäre Perspektive auf den Prozess der Bildungsproduktion nach bzw. durch PISA und ähnliche Studien, um die Existenz von Konvergenzprozessen im Bildungsbereich und eventuelle Wechselwirkungen zu analysieren. Wie wir zeigen werden, untersuchen die einzelnen Fachdisziplinen aufgrund ihrer disziplinär verankerten Fragestellungen und Foki jeweils für sich unterschiedliche Aspekte des Forschungsgegenstandes. Nach nunmehr gut zehn Jahren mit einer weitestgehend disziplinären Beschäftigung mit PISA und ihren Folgen ist es notwendig, sich auf einer übergreifenden Ebene mit den Veränderungen in der Organisation und Produktion von Bildung nach und durch PISA zu befassen. Eine solche Meta-Perspektive auf den Wandel verspricht besonders erkenntnisfördernd zu sein, wenn sie interdisziplinär verschiedene sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektiven und Zugänge integriert. Gerade auf diese Weise lassen sich Zusammenhänge und Wechselwirkungen von Prozessen im Bildungsbereich rekonstruieren, die Konvergenzen befördern. Infolgedessen vermittelt ein interdisziplinärer Forschungsansatz ein umfassenderes und genaueres Bild der Folgen internationaler Schulleistungsstudien, als es aus einer isolierten Fachperspektive möglich wäre.

Suggested Citation

  • Martens, Kerstin & Breiter, Andreas & Idel, Till-Sebastian & Knipping, Christine & Teltemann, Janna, 2013. "Das "PISA Phänomen": Ein Plädoyer für einen interdisziplinären Ansatz zur Erforschung von Bildungsproduktion im Kontext von Large-Scale-Assessments," TranState Working Papers 175, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/87679/1/771382278.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schlicht-Schmälzle, Raphaela & Teltemann, Janna & Windzio, Michael, 2011. "Deregulation of education: What does it mean for efficiency and equality?," TranState Working Papers 157, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    2. Martens, Kerstin & Jakobi, Anja P. (ed.), 2010. "Mechanisms of OECD Governance: International Incentives for National Policy-Making?," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199591145, Decembrie.
    3. Ansell,Ben W., 2010. "From the Ballot to the Blackboard," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521190183, November.
    4. Simon Breakspear, 2012. "The Policy Impact of PISA: An Exploration of the Normative Effects of International Benchmarking in School System Performance," OECD Education Working Papers 71, OECD Publishing.
    5. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2000. "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 404-428, August.
    6. Finnemore, Martha, 1993. "International organizations as teachers of norms: the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cutural Organization and science policy," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(4), pages 565-597, October.
    7. Busemeyer, Marius R. & Trampusch, Christine, 2011. "Review Article: Comparative Political Science and the Study of Education," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 413-443, April.
    8. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1992. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 398-427, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pamela J. Hinds & Diane E. Bailey, 2003. "Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 615-632, December.
    2. Pascale Amans & Agnes Mazars & Fabienne Villesèque-Dubus, 2013. "Techniques de gestion et organisations du spectacle vivant : quels dispositifs de soutien et quelles interactions pour l'innovation artistique ?," Post-Print hal-01002362, HAL.
    3. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    4. Daniel Beverungen, 2014. "Exploring the Interplay of the Design and Emergence of Business Processes as Organizational Routines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(4), pages 191-202, August.
    5. Michiel Bal & Jos Benders & Lander Vermeerbergen, 2022. "‘Bringing the Covert into the Open’: A Case Study on Technology Appropriation and Continuous Improvement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Stephen R. Barley & Debra E. Meyerson & Stine Grodal, 2011. "E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 887-906, August.
    7. Adhikari, Pawan & Upadhaya, Bedanand & Wijethilake, Chaminda & Dhakal Adhikari, Shovita, 2023. "The sociomateriality of digitalisation in Nepalese NGOs," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8820 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Paula Jarzabkowski & Sarah Kaplan, 2015. "Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 537-558, April.
    10. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2020. "Why distance matters: The relatedness between technology development and its appropriation in smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. François-Xavier de Vaujany, 2008. "Capturing Reflexivity Modes In Is: A Critical Realist Approach," Post-Print hal-00644416, HAL.
    12. Khuong, Le-Nguyen & Harindranath, G. & Dyerson, Romano, 2014. "Understanding knowledge management software-organisation misalignments from an institutional perspective: A case study of a global IT-management consultancy firm," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 226-247.
    13. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Nathalie Mitev & Matthew Smith & Isabelle Walsh, 2017. "Renewing Literature Reviews in MIS Research? A Critical Realist Approach," Working Papers hal-01648133, HAL.
    14. Susita Asree, PhD & Mohamed Zain, PhD, 2012. "Influence of Learning Technologies on Learning Effectiveness," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 2(3), pages 29-38, June.
    15. Paul M. Leonardi, 2011. "Innovation Blindness: Culture, Frames, and Cross-Boundary Problem Construction in the Development of New Technology Concepts," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 347-369, April.
    16. M.-L. Goury & A. Spalanzani, 2009. "Le rôle de l'outil de gestion des connaissances pour les communautés de pratique : le cas d'une chambre de commerce et d'industrie," Post-Print halshs-00540281, HAL.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2753 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville, 2005. "The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 618-636, December.
    19. Aurélie Dudézert & Nathalie Mitev & Ewan Oiry, 2021. "Cultural metaphors and KMS appropriation: drawing on Astérix to understand non-use in a large French company," Post-Print hal-03227049, HAL.
    20. Henri Barki & Ryad Titah & Céline Boffo, 2007. "Information System Use--Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 173-192, June.
    21. Sébastien Tran, 2010. "Quand les TIC réussissent trop bien dans les organisations : le cas du courrier électronique chez les managers," Post-Print halshs-00638824, HAL.
    22. Leroux, Erick & Pupion, Pierre-Charles, 2022. "Smart territories and IoT adoption by local authorities: A question of trust, efficiency, and relationship with the citizen-user-taxpayer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zesbrde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.