IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkrp/323951.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quo vadis, USA?

Author

Listed:
  • Bachmann, Ruediger

Abstract

* Die zweite Präsidentschaft Donald Trumps könnte die Vereinigten Staaten noch tiefer in eine erratische, autoritär geprägte Politik treiben - mit globalen Folgen. Deutschland und Europa dürfen darauf nicht mit Abwarten reagieren, sondern müssen strategisch und entschlossen handeln. Dabei liegt die Unberechenbarkeit Trumps nicht allein an seiner Persönlichkeit, sondern ist strukturell bedingt. Der sogenannte Trumpismus ist keine konsistente Ideologie, sondern ein instabiles Machtbündnis verschiedenster Strömungen - von christlichem Nationalismus über Großmachtchauvinismus bis hin zu technokratischem Oligarchendenken. Diese Koalition bleibt nur durch autoritäre Führungsloyalität und Feindbildmobilisierung zusammen - und produziert damit zwangsläufig erratische Politik. * Auch ökonomisch drohen massive Verwerfungen. Trumps protektionistische Agenda ist ineffizient und teils bewusst destruktiv angelegt. Besonders gravierend: Die fahrlässige Zoll- und Schuldenpolitik gefährdet die weltweite Rolle des US-Dollars als Reservewährung. Die Welt benötigt momentan aber den Kapitalmarkt der USA, während die USA sich damit einen hohen Konsum finanzieren können. Ein Rückzug globaler Kapitalströme aus den USA würde daher nicht nur der amerikanischen Wirtschaft schaden, sondern auch das internationale Finanzsystem destabilisieren. Erste Anzeichen für einen solchen Vertrauensverlust sind bereits sichtbar. * Die richtige Reaktion Deutschlands und vor allem Europas auf diese Erratik und Unsicherheit ist gerade kein Attentismus, sondern ein proaktives Umgehen damit. Europa muss unter den Bedingungen einer großmachtpolitisch geprägten Welt selbst zu einer strategischen Großmacht werden - militärisch, ökonomisch und kulturell. Andernfalls droht der politische Bedeutungsverlust in einer zunehmend multipolaren Welt. * Während bei der militärischen Stärkung erste Schritte erkennbar sind, fehlt es an einer ambitionierten Innovations- und Wachstumspolitik. Besonders kritisch sind die Rückschritte Europas bei Bildung und kulturellem Einfluss: Statt globale Talente anzuziehen, dominierten Abschottungstendenzen und provinzielles Denken - etwa in der deutschen Hochschul- und Steuerpolitik. * Die vorliegende Analyse zeichnet ein besorgniserregendes Bild der transatlantischen Zukunft: Die USA unter Trumps zweiter Präsidentschaft könnten multilaterale Institutionen weiter schwächen, Europa nicht mehr als Partner, sondern als Rivalen betrachten. Ein nostalgischer Transatlantizismus ist deshalb keine tragfähige Option mehr. Ein Europa, das aus vielen Schweizen besteht, ist nicht überlebensfähig. Nur eine geeinte, gestaltungsfähige europäische Großmacht könnte dem globalen Machtvakuum etwas entgegensetzen. Die politische Existenz Europas steht auf dem Spiel.

Suggested Citation

  • Bachmann, Ruediger, 2025. "Quo vadis, USA?," Kiel Reports 4, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkrp:323951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/323951/1/1933112905.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caldara, Dario & Iacoviello, Matteo & Molligo, Patrick & Prestipino, Andrea & Raffo, Andrea, 2020. "The economic effects of trade policy uncertainty," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 38-59.
    2. Rüdiger Bachmann & Sebastian K. Rüth, 2020. "Systematic Monetary Policy And The Macroeconomic Effects Of Shifts In Residential Loan‐To‐Value Ratios," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(2), pages 503-530, May.
    3. David H. Autor & David Dorn & Gordon H. Hanson, 2013. "The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(6), pages 2121-2168, October.
    4. Kyle Handley & Nuno Limão, 2022. "Trade Policy Uncertainty," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 363-395, August.
    5. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde & Pablo Guerrón-Quintana & Keith Kuester & Juan Rubio-Ramírez, 2015. "Fiscal Volatility Shocks and Economic Activity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(11), pages 3352-3384, November.
    6. Francis Dillon & Edward L. Glaeser & William Kerr, 2025. "Workplace Segregation between College and Noncollege Workers," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 115, pages 139-145, May.
    7. J. Bradford De Long & Lawrence H. Summers, 1991. "Equipment Investment and Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(2), pages 445-502.
    8. Lashkaripour, Ahmad, 2021. "The cost of a global tariff war: A sufficient statistics approach," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. David Baqaee & Hannes Malmberg, 2025. "Long-Run Effects of Trade Wars," NBER Working Papers 33702, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Pablo D Fajgelbaum & Pinelopi K Goldberg & Patrick J Kennedy & Amit K Khandelwal, 2020. "The Return to Protectionism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(1), pages 1-55.
    11. Diamond, Peter A & Mirrlees, James A, 1971. "Optimal Taxation and Public Production II: Tax Rules," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(3), pages 261-278, June.
    12. Diamond, Peter A & Mirrlees, James A, 1971. "Optimal Taxation and Public Production: I--Production Efficiency," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 8-27, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Poilly, Céline & Tripier, Fabien, 2025. "Regional trade policy uncertainty," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Haoyuan Ding & Bo Pu & Tong Qi & Kai Wang, 2022. "Valuation effects of the US–China trade war: The effects of foreign managers and foreign exposure," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 662-683, July.
    3. Bekkers, Eddy & Schroeter, Sofia, 2020. "An economic analysis of the US-China trade conflict," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2020-04, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    4. Antràs, Pol & de Gortari, Alonso & Itskhoki, Oleg, 2017. "Globalization, inequality and welfare," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 387-412.
    5. Cui, Chuantao & Li, Leona Shao-Zhi, 2023. "Trade policy uncertainty and new firm entry: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Ruohan Wu & Mario J. Miranda, 2023. "Dynamic impacts of intermittent trade conflicts," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 681-701, March.
    7. Daniel Carroll & Sewon Hur, 2023. "On The Distributional Effects Of International Tariffs," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(4), pages 1311-1346, November.
    8. Liao, Hua & Peng, Ying & Wang, Fang-Zhi & Zhang, Tong, 2022. "Understanding energy use growth: The role of investment-GDP ratio," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 15-24.
    9. Becko, John Sturm, 2024. "A theory of economic sanctions as terms-of-trade manipulation," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Joseph S Shapiro, 2021. "The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(2), pages 831-886.
    11. Lukas Boer & Malte Rieth, 2024. "The Macroeconomic Consequences of Import Tariffs and Trade Policy Uncertainty," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2072, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    12. repec:cdl:agrebk:qt7jh2s7d6 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:cdl:econwp:qt90v90406 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Yuko Imura, 2023. "Reassessing Trade Barriers with Global Production Networks," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 77-116, December.
    15. Börjesson, Maria & Asplund, Disa & Hamilton, Carl, 2021. "Optimal kilometre tax for electric passenger cars," Working Papers 2021:3, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    16. Parry, Ian W.H., 2008. "How should heavy-duty trucks be taxed?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 651-668, March.
    17. Tim Besley & Rohini Pande, 1998. "Read my lips: the political economy of information transmission," IFS Working Papers W98/13, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    18. Alberto Gago & Xavier Labandeira & Xiral López Otero, 2014. "A Panorama on Energy Taxes and Green Tax Reforms," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 208(1), pages 145-190, March.
    19. Jaume Sempere, 2022. "On potential Pareto gains from free trade areas formation," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(6), pages 1502-1518, December.
    20. da Costa, Carlos E. & Pereira, Thiago, 2014. "On the efficiency of equal sacrifice income tax schedules," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 399-418.
    21. Støstad, Morten Nyborg & Cowell, Frank, 2024. "Inequality as an externality: Consequences for tax design," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    22. Andrew Greenland & John Lopresti, 2021. "Trade Policy as an Exogenous Shock: Focusing on the Specifics," Upjohn Working Papers 21-349, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • E60 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General
    • E65 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Studies of Particular Policy Episodes
    • E66 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General Outlook and Conditions
    • H60 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkrp:323951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.