IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/341306.html

Agentic Capital as a Productive Asset in the Agentic Economy: A Panel Econometric Analysis of Productivity Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Gondauri, Davit
  • Batiashvili, Mikheil

Abstract

This article develops Agentic Capital as a measurable and econometrically testable productive category of the agentic economy. The core argument is that models, data, robots, compute, protocols, and human-sovereignty systems are no longer auxiliary digital inputs; they increasingly constitute a composite stock of productive assets that enables economic action to be selected, executed, verified, and governed. To operationalise this concept, the study constructs a six-pillar Agentic Capital framework composed of model capital, data capital, robotic physical capital, compute capital, protocol capital, and human sovereignty capital. The methodology adapts the diagnostics-first logic of the Gondauri Index by using robust normalisation, additive and geometric aggregation, balance and gap diagnostics, non-compensatory adjustment and scenario pathways. The key transformation is the Gondauri-adjusted Agentic Capital Index, which integrates macro-financial resilience into the agentic-capital measurement architecture so that technological readiness is not interpreted separately from systemic resilience. Empirically, the article applies a country-year panel design for nine economies over 2005-2024 and estimates the relationship between agentic capital and labour productivity growth through a layered econometric strategy. The analysis combines pooled OLS, random effects, fixed effects, Hausman model selection, panel unit-root diagnostics, Pesaran cross-sectional dependence testing, Driscoll-Kraay robust standard errors, dynamic panel GMM, IV-2SLS, panel quantile regression, Hansen-style threshold estimation, mediation analysis, component-level fixed effects, and robustness checks. The results indicate that geometric agentic capital is positively associated with labour productivity performance, that structural imbalance weakens the maturity of the system, and that human sovereignty and governance conditions shape the productivity value of agentic systems. The article contributes to capital theory by shifting the analytical focus from accumulated productive assets toward accumulated capacity for governed economic action. It also provides a reproducible empirical architecture for assessing how countries, sectors, and firms can transform AI readiness into legitimate, auditable, and productivity-relevant agentic capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Gondauri, Davit & Batiashvili, Mikheil, 2026. "Agentic Capital as a Productive Asset in the Agentic Economy: A Panel Econometric Analysis of Productivity Dynamics," EconStor Preprints 341306, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341306/1/Agentic_Capital_Full_Econometric_Gondauri.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoffrey G. Parker & Marshall W. Van Alstyne, 2005. "Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(10), pages 1494-1504, October.
    2. Benhabib, Jess & Spiegel, Mark M., 1994. "The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 143-173, October.
    3. Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2014. "Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(8), pages 2509-2526, August.
    4. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    5. Tyna Eloundou & Sam Manning & Pamela Mishkin & Daniel Rock, 2023. "GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models," Papers 2303.10130, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth J. Altman & Frank Nagle & Michael L. Tushman, 2013. "Innovating Without Information Constraints: Organizations, Communities, and Innovation When Information Costs Approach Zero," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-043, Harvard Business School, revised Sep 2014.
    2. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    3. Jinhyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KyungBae Park & Lei Shi, 2020. "Sustainability Condition of Open Innovation: Dynamic Growth of Alibaba from SME to Large Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Antonio Martins-Neto & Nanditha Mathew & Pierre Mohnen & Tania Treibich, 2024. "Is There Job Polarization in Developing Economies? A Review and Outlook," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 39(2), pages 259-288.
    5. Harry Moroz & Mariana Viollaz, 2024. "The Future of Work in Central America and the Dominican Republic," World Bank Publications - Reports 42043, The World Bank Group.
    6. Cha, Hongryol, 2020. "A paradigm shift in the global strategy of MNEs towards business ecosystems: A research agenda for new theory development," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(3).
    7. Yeo, Yeongjun & Lee, Jeong-Dong, 2020. "Revitalizing the race between technology and education: Investigating the growth strategy for the knowledge-based economy based on a CGE analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    8. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    9. Michael J. Böhm & Ben Etheridge & Aitor Irastorza-Fadrique, 2024. "The impact of labour demand shocks when occupational labour supplies are heterogeneous," IFS Working Papers W24/28, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Santoso, Adhi Setyo, 2018. "Maximizing Strategic Alliances in the Multi-Sided Platform Firms," INA-Rxiv eyskp, Center for Open Science.
    11. Marin, Giovanni & Vona, Francesco, 2023. "Finance and the reallocation of scientific, engineering and mathematical talent," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    12. Satish Nambisan & Shaker A. Zahra & Yadong Luo, 2019. "Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1464-1486, December.
    13. Stefania Albanesi & António Dias da Silva & Juan F Jimeno & Ana Lamo & Alena Wabitsch, 2025. "New technologies and jobs in Europe," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 40(121), pages 71-139.
    14. Julien Gosse & Charles Hoffreumon & Nicolas van Zeebroeck & Jacques Bughin, 2020. "The Value of Platform Strategy. It's the Ecosystem. Stupid!," iCite Working Papers 2020-033, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. Wang, Juite & Lai, Jung-Yu & Chang, Chih-Hsin, 2016. "Modeling and analysis for mobile application services: The perspective of mobile network operators," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 146-163.
    16. Parente, Ronaldo C. & Geleilate, José-Mauricio G. & Rong, Ke, 2018. "The Sharing Economy Globalization Phenomenon: A Research Agenda," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 52-64.
    17. Jabłońska, Julia & Mućk, Jakub, 2025. "Appetite for Destruction. A firm-level portrait of automation in Poland," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 391-402.
    18. Shamim, Saqib & Zeng, Jing & Shafi Choksy, Umair & Shariq, Syed Muhammad, 2020. "Connecting big data management capabilities with employee ambidexterity in Chinese multinational enterprises through the mediation of big data value creation at the employee level," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    19. Julien Gosse & Charles Hoffreumon & Nicolas van Zeebroeck & Jacques Bughin, 2020. "The Value of Platform Strategy It's the Ecosystem, Stupid!," Working Papers TIMES² 2020-039, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Bhatti, Waheed Akbar & Vahlne, Jan-Erik & Glowik, Mario & Larimo, Jorma Antero, 2022. "The impact of industry 4.0 on the 2017 version of the Uppsala model," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(4).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • C43 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Index Numbers and Aggregation
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.