IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/arqudp/146.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Compliance cost estimates: Survey non-response and temporal framing effects

Author

Listed:
  • Eichfelder, Sebastian

Abstract

Due to empirical research, tax and accounting compliance costs are a considerable burden for private businesses. However, cost estimates may be biased due to survey nonresponse and questionnaire framing effects. This paper investigates the impact of both aspects on the estimated cost burden. I do not find significant evidence for a non-response bias. By contrast, my results indicate that framing effects regarding the temporal dimension of cost measurement (temporal framing effects) might alter cost estimates by up to 68 percent downwards (respectively 211 percent upwards). There is also evidence that temporal framing effects are more relevant for small self-employed businesses with limited information capacities and accounting obligations as well as for internal cost burdens.

Suggested Citation

  • Eichfelder, Sebastian, 2013. "Compliance cost estimates: Survey non-response and temporal framing effects," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 146, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arqudp:146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/84884/1/769085148.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Iliev, 2010. "The Effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, Earnings Quality, and Stock Prices," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(3), pages 1163-1196, June.
    2. Adam S. Maiga & Fred A. Jacobs, 2008. "Extent of ABC Use and Its Consequences," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 533-566, June.
    3. Ping Zhang, 2007. "The Impact of the Public's Expectations of Auditors on Audit Quality and Auditing Standards Compliance," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 631-654, June.
    4. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    5. Owen O'Donnell & Eddy van Doorslaer & Adam Wagstaff & Magnus Lindelow, 2008. "Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data : A Guide to Techniques and Their Implementation," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6896, December.
    6. repec:fpb:wpaper:100 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Kennedy, Peter E, 1981. "Estimation with Correctly Interpreted Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations [The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations]," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(4), pages 801-801, September.
    8. Robyn Pilcher & Graeme Dean, 2009. "Consequences and Costs of Financial Reporting Compliance for Local Government," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 725-744.
    9. Sebastian Eichfelder & Chantal Kegels, 2012. "Compliance costs caused by agency action? Empirical evidence and implications for tax compliance," Schumpeter Discussion Papers sdp12005, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    10. Jean Jinghan Chen & Haitao Zhang, 2010. "The Impact of Regulatory Enforcement and Audit upon IFRS Compliance - Evidence from China," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 665-692.
    11. Sophie Hoozée & Lea Vermeire & Werner Bruggeman, 2012. "The Impact of Refinement on the Accuracy of Time-driven ABC," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 48(4), pages 439-472, December.
    12. repec:fpb:wpaper:94 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. John Hasseldine & Peggy Hite & Simon James & Marika Toumi, 2007. "Persuasive Communications: Tax Compliance Enforcement Strategies for Sole Proprietors," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 171-194, March.
    14. Hudson, John & Godwin, Michael, 2000. "The compliance costs of collecting direct tax in the UK:: An analysis of PAYE and National Insurance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 29-44, July.
    15. repec:fpb:wpaper:92 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Eva Labro & Mario Vanhoucke, 2008. "Diversity in Resource Consumption Patterns and Robustness of Costing Systems to Errors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1715-1730, October.
    17. Sebastian Eichfelder & Michael Schorn, 2012. "Tax Compliance Costs: A Business-Administration Perspective," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 68(2), pages 191-230, June.
    18. Shelley, MK & Omer, TC & Atwood, TJ, 1998. "Capital restructuring and accounting compliance costs: The case of publicly traded partnerships," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 365-378.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Eichfelder & François Vaillancourt, 2014. "Tax Compliance Costs: A Review of Cost Burdens and Cost Structures," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 210(3), pages 111-148, September.
    2. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Hechtner, Frank, 2016. "Tax compliance costs: Cost burden and cost reliability," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 212, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Hechtner, Frank, 2016. "Tax compliance costs: Cost burden and cost reliability," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 212, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    2. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Kegels, Chantal, 2014. "Compliance costs caused by agency action? Empirical evidence and implications for tax compliance," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 200-219.
    3. Michael O'Donnell & Robert P. Berrens, 2018. "Understanding Falling Municipal Water Demand in a Small City Dependent on the Declining Ogallala Aquifer: Case Study of Clovis, New Mexico," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(04), pages 1-40, October.
    4. Sebastian Eichfelder & Kerstin Schneider, 2014. "Tax Incentives and Business Investment: Evidence from German Bonus Depreciation," CESifo Working Paper Series 4805, CESifo.
    5. Mutandwa, Edward & Grala, Robert K. & Grebner, Donald L., 2016. "Family forest land availability for the production of ecosystem services in Mississippi, United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 18-24.
    6. Enzo Dia & Jacques Melitz, 2024. "The impact of common law on the volume of legal services: An international study," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 265-297, January.
    7. Maiga, Adam S., 2014. "Assessing self-selection and endogeneity issues in the relation between activity-based costing and performance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 251-262.
    8. Darren K. Hayunga, 2018. "Sales Concessions in the US Housing Market," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 33-75, January.
    9. Rudolf, Katrin & Hennings, Nina & Dippold, Michaela A. & Edison, Edi & Wollni, Meike, 2021. "Improving economic and environmental outcomes in oil palm smallholdings: The relationship between mulching, soil properties and yields," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Hasan Vergil & Erdogan Teyyare, 2017. "Crisis, Institutional Quality and Economic Growth," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 1-19.
    11. Adam Gorajek, 2018. "Econometric Perspectives on Economic Measurement," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2018-08, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    12. Rabindra Nepal & John Foster & Antonio Carvalho, 2014. "Revisiting Electricity Liberalization and Security of Supply: Empirical Evidence," Energy Economics and Management Group Working Papers 7-2014, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    13. Ligane Massamba Séne & Ousmane Badiane, 2016. "Out-of-pocket health payments: a catalyst for agriculturalproductivity growth, but with potentially impoverishingeffects in Senegal," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 97(1), pages 29-49.
    14. Alderighi, Stefano, 2018. "The determinants of retail trading activity in emerging markets: A cross-market analysis," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 152-167.
    15. Greiner, Adam J., 2017. "An examination of real activities management and corporate cash holdings," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 79-90.
    16. Julius Ohrnberger, 2022. "Economic shocks, health, and social protection: The effect of COVID‐19 income shocks on health and mitigation through cash transfers in South Africa," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(11), pages 2481-2498, November.
    17. Tambo, Justice A. & Uzayisenga, Bellancile & Mugambi, Idah & Bundi, Mary & Silvestri, Silvia, 2020. "Plant clinics, farm performance and poverty alleviation: Panel data evidence from Rwanda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    18. Depenbusch, Lutz, 2017. "Gender Price Gaps in Central Kenyan Vegetable Wet Markets," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 264021, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    19. Gustav Kjellsson, 2018. "Extending decomposition analysis to account for unobserved heterogeneity and persistence in health behavior: Income‐related smoking inequality among Swedish women," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 440-447, February.
    20. Wolfgang Bessler & Johannes Beyenbach & Marc Steffen Rapp & Marco Vendrasco, 2023. "Why do firms down-list or exit from securities markets?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1175-1211, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    compliance cost measurement; measurement error; non-response bias; temporal framing effect;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arqudp:146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.arqus.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.