Euroland and East Asia in a Dollar-Based International Monetary System: Mundell Revisited
August 9, 1999 Robert Mundell's long standing enthusiasm for European monetary unification was vindicated by the formal advent of the euro on January 1, 1999. For almost 30 years, he has seen clearly that the advantages of a common European currency would swamp any disadvantages. But therein lies a paradox. The fierce scholarly debate for more than a decade before EMU's advent on whether a one-size-fits-all monetary policy was appropriate for Europe pitted politicians, who on the continent were mainly in favor, against economists, who generally were much more doubtful. And the doubters who opposed EMU used arguments drawn from Mundell's own work! Specifically, his classic article, "The Theory of Optimum Currency Currency Areas (1961) comes down against a one-size-fits-all monetary policy-and seems to argue in favor of making currency areas smaller rather than larger. In this paper, I will first present some doctrinal history to resolve the paradox and better explain Mundell's position today. Second, I will look at how the new euro and the dollar can best co-exist-given the latter's traditional role as international money. Third, in the absence of an "Asian euro", I will argue for a common monetary standard in East Asia based on the dollar.
|Date of creation:||09 Aug 1999|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Ralph Landau Economics Building, Stanford, CA 94305-6072|
Web page: http://www-econ.stanford.edu/econ/workp/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Jacob A. Frenkel & Michael L. Mussa, 1980. "Efficiency of Foreign Exchange Markets and Measures of Turbulence," NBER Working Papers 0476, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Eichengreen, Barry, 1993. "European Monetary Unification," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 1321-57, September.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:stanec:99020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.