IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vua/wpaper/2003-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Coinnovation research : manual for experiential research into organizational coinnovation

Author

Listed:
  • Bossink, B.A.G.

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

Abstract

This manual contains a method for research into organizational coinnovation. The coinnovation process is the organizational development and market adoption of original ideas into new goods, services, and practices by cooperating organizations. Coinnovations are the outcomes of the coinnovation processes. The aim of this manual is to provide a comprehensive method to researchers who want to investigate organizational coinnovation. In this first introductory chapter the four basic themes of the method are summarized. In the next four chapters these themes are further explained. The sixth and final chapter contains guidelines for the use of the method and the composition of a coinnovation research report.

Suggested Citation

  • Bossink, B.A.G., 2003. "Coinnovation research : manual for experiential research into organizational coinnovation," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    • Handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2003-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/20030016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bart Bossink, 2002. "A Dutch public-private strategy for innovation in sustainable construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 633-642.
    2. Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & William H. Newman, 1990. "Bases Of Interorganization Co‐Operation: Propensity, Power, Persistence," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 417-434, July.
    3. Yves L. Doz & Paul M. Olk & Peter Smith Ring, 2000. "Formation processes of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 239-266, March.
    4. Bossink, B.A.G., 2002. "Innovative quality management practices in the Dutch construction industry," Serie Research Memoranda 0021, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. J. Cunningham, 1997. "Case study principles for different types of cases," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 401-423, November.
    6. W. Edwards Deming, 2000. "Out of the Crisis," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262541157, December.
    7. C. H. Nam & C. B. Tatum, 1997. "Leaders and champions for construction innovation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 259-270.
    8. Jeffrey H. Dyer, 1997. "Effective interim collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 535-556, August.
    9. James A. Christiansen, 2000. "Building the Innovative Organization," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-333-97744-6.
    10. Mariko Sakakibara, 1997. "Heterogeneity Of Firm Capabilities And Cooperative Research And Development: An Empirical Examination Of Motives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 143-164, July.
    11. Bossink, B.A.G., 2002. "A Dutch public-private strategy for innovation in sustainable construction," Serie Research Memoranda 0037, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bossink, B.A.G., 2002. "The development of co-innovation strategies: stages and interaction patterns in interfirm innovation," Serie Research Memoranda 0020, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. Bossink, B.A.G. & Blauw, Jan-Nico, 2003. "Strategic ambitions as drivers of improvement at Daimler Chrysler," Serie Research Memoranda 0002, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    3. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2004. "Effectiveness of Innovation Leadership Styles: A Manager’s Influence on Ecological Innovation in Construction Projects," Serie Research Memoranda 0027, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    4. Pinar Ozcan & Douglas Hannah, 2020. "Social Origins of Great Strategies Advertising Suppliers to Realize Disruptive Social Media Technology," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 193-217, September.
    5. Gianni Lorenzoni, 2010. "Genesis of a research field: district, network, strategic network," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 14(3), pages 221-239, August.
    6. Xiaoli Yin & Jianfeng Wu & Wenpin Tsai, 2012. "When Unconnected Others Connect: Does Degree of Brokerage Persist After the Formation of a Multipartner Alliance?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1682-1699, December.
    7. Liena Kano, 2018. "Global value chain governance: A relational perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(6), pages 684-705, August.
    8. Ying Li & Ronggui Ding & Tao Sun, 2019. "The Drivers and Performance of Environmental Practices in the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2004. "Managing drivers of innovation in construction networks," Serie Research Memoranda 0015, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    10. Bossink, Bart, 2020. "Learning strategies in sustainable energy demonstration projects: What organizations learn from sustainable energy demonstrations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Valentina Morandi, 2013. "The management of industry–university joint research projects: how do partners coordinate and control R&D activities?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 69-92, April.
    12. Xu, Luyun & Zeng, Deming, 2021. "When does the diverse partnership of R&D alliances promote new product development? The contingent effect of the knowledge base," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Maria Di Guardo & Kathryn Harrigan, 2012. "Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: a co-citation analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 789-811, December.
    14. Robert Osei-Kyei & Albert P. C. Chan & Yao Yu & Chuan Chen & Yongjian Ke & Bashir Tijani, 2019. "Social Responsibility Initiatives for Public-Private Partnership Projects: A Comparative Study between China and Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Chung, Seungwha (Andy) & Kim, Gyeong Mook, 2003. "Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the supplier's standpoint," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 587-603, April.
    16. Sakakibara, Mariko, 1997. "Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 447-473, December.
    17. Van Wijk, Raymond & Nadolska, Anna, 2020. "Making more of alliance portfolios: The role of alliance portfolio coordination," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 388-399.
    18. Ariño, Africa & Reuer, Jeffrey J., 2004. "Alliance contractual design," IESE Research Papers D/572, IESE Business School.
    19. John M. de Figueiredo & Brian S. Silverman, 2017. "On the Genesis of Interfirm Relational Contracts," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 234-245, December.
    20. Dietmar Harhoff & Elisabeth Mueller & John Van Reenen, 2014. "What are the Channels for Technology Sourcing? Panel Data Evidence from German Companies," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 204-224, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2003-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R. Dam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fewvunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.