What is this thing called ‘heterodox economics’?
This paper conducts a type of meta-analysis of a sample of commentaries on heterodox economics, also drawing on biological literature and other treatments of classification. The paper contrasts what might be called a ‘classical’ category with a ‘modern’ category and then analyses treatments of HE as a category. It is argued that though HE appears to be a complex object – and that authors recognise this – HE as a category is most often classical even though modern would appear more appropriate. That this is the case may reflect choices of levels of abstraction which in turn reflect instrumental purposes of influencing the reality of Economics. While arguments for the rejection of HE as a category are too strong, current treatments of HE are perhaps not careful enough in recognising its provisional and fluid nature. The paper considers these issues in turn.
|Date of creation:||Jun 2010|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: 0117 328 3610
Web page: http://www1.uwe.ac.uk/bl/research/bristoleconomics.aspx
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- David Dequech, 2007.
"Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics,"
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics,
M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 279-302, December.
- David Dequech, 2007. "Neoclassical, Mainstream, Orthodox, And Heterodox Economics," Anais do XXXV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 35th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 043, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pósgraduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
- Dow, Sheila C, 1990. "Beyond Dualism," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 143-57, June.
- D. Meador, 2009. "Comment on “What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Historians of Economic Thought”," Forum for Social Economics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 71-73, April.
- Backhouse, Roger E., 2000. "Progress in Heterodox Economics," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(02), pages 149-155, June.
- Alan Freeman, 2009. "The Economists of Tomorrow: the Case for a Pluralist Subject Benchmark Statement for Economics," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 8(2), pages 23-40.
- Wynne Godley & B. Anwar Shaikh, 1998.
"An Important Inconsistency at the Heart of the Standard Macroeconomic Model,"
- Wynne Godley & Anwar Shaikh, 2002. "An Important Inconsistency at the Heart of the Standard Macroeconomic Model," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 24(3), pages 423-441, April.
- Wynne Godley & Anwar M. Shaikh, 1998. "An Important Inconsistency at the Heart of the Standard Macroeconomic Model," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_236, Levy Economics Institute.
- Andrew Mearman, 2011.
"Who Do Heterodox Economists Think They Are?,"
American Journal of Economics and Sociology,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 480-510, 04.
- Davis, John B, 1999. "Common Sense: A Middle Way between Formalism and Post-Structuralism?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 503-15, July.
- Brian J. Loasby, 2003.
"Closed models and open systems,"
SCEME Working Papers: Advances in Economic Methodology
- Andy Denis, 2009.
"Pluralism in Economics Education,"
International Review of Economic Education,
Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 8(2), pages 6-22.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwe:wpaper:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Felix Ritchie)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.