IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/umc/wpaper/1911.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unbiased Estimation as a Public Good

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Bias and variance help measure how bad (or good) an estimator is. When considering a single estimate, minimizing variance plus squared bias (i.e., mean squared error) is optimal in a certain sense. Sometimes a smoothing parameter is explicitly chosen to produce such an optimal estimator. However, important parameters in economics are often estimated multiple times, in many studies over many years, collectively contributing to a public body of evidence. From this perspective, the bias of each single estimate is relatively more important, even if mean squared error minimization remains the goal. This suggests some tension between the single best estimate a paper can report and the estimate that contributes most to the public good. Simulations compare instrumental variables and linear regression, as well as different levels of smoothing for instrumental variables quantile regression.

Suggested Citation

  • David M. Kaplan, 2019. "Unbiased Estimation as a Public Good," Working Papers 1911, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
    • Handle: RePEc:umc:wpaper:1911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1c-XHSs_TTwxjqWNxBLwq1PQZudEzJA7p/view?usp=sharing
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isaiah Andrews & Timothy B. Armstrong, 2017. "Unbiased instrumental variables estimation under known first‐stage sign," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), pages 479-503, July.
    2. DiTraglia, Francis J., 2016. "Using invalid instruments on purpose: Focused moment selection and averaging for GMM," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 195(2), pages 187-208.
    3. Kaplan, David M. & Sun, Yixiao, 2017. "Smoothed Estimating Equations For Instrumental Variables Quantile Regression," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 105-157, February.
    4. Arthur Lewbel, 2019. "The Identification Zoo: Meanings of Identification in Econometrics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 57(4), pages 835-903, December.
    5. Xu Cheng & Zhipeng Liao & Ruoyao Shi, 2019. "On uniform asymptotic risk of averaging GMM estimators," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(3), pages 931-979, July.
    6. Alexander Frankel & Maximilian Kasy, 2022. "Which Findings Should Be Published?," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, February.
    7. Bruce E. Hansen, 2017. "Stein-like 2SLS estimator," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6-9), pages 840-852, October.
    8. Horowitz, Joel L, 1992. "A Smoothed Maximum Score Estimator for the Binary Response Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(3), pages 505-531, May.
    9. James J. Heckman & Vytlacil, Edward J., 2007. "Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part I: Causal Models, Structural Models and Econometric Policy Evaluation," Handbook of Econometrics, in: J.J. Heckman & E.E. Leamer (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 70, Elsevier.
    10. Keisuke Hirano & Jack R. Porter, 2015. "Location Properties of Point Estimators in Linear Instrumental Variables and Related Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6-10), pages 720-733, December.
    11. Kinal, Terrence W, 1980. "The Existence of Moments of k-Class Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(1), pages 241-249, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Liu, 2019. "Averaging estimation for instrumental variables quantile regression," Working Papers 1907, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
    2. de Castro, Luciano & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kaplan, David M. & Liu, Xin, 2019. "Smoothed GMM for quantile models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 121-144.
    3. Edvard Bakhitov, 2020. "Frequentist Shrinkage under Inequality Constraints," Papers 2001.10586, arXiv.org.
    4. de Castro, Luciano & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kaplan, David M. & Liu, Xin, 2019. "Smoothed GMM for quantile models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 121-144.
    5. Ruoyao Shi, 2021. "An Averaging Estimator for Two Step M Estimation in Semiparametric Models," Working Papers 202105, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    6. Kaplan, David M. & Sun, Yixiao, 2017. "Smoothed Estimating Equations For Instrumental Variables Quantile Regression," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 105-157, February.
    7. Pereda-Fernández, Santiago, 2023. "Identification and estimation of triangular models with a binary treatment," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 585-623.
    8. Bruins, Marianne & Duffy, James A. & Keane, Michael P. & Smith, Anthony A., 2018. "Generalized indirect inference for discrete choice models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 177-203.
    9. Bai Huang & Tae-Hwy Lee & Aman Ullah, 2017. "A combined estimator of regression models with measurement errors," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 73-91, December.
    10. Graham Elliott & Nikolay Kudrin & Kaspar Wuthrich, 2022. "The Power of Tests for Detecting $p$-Hacking," Papers 2205.07950, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    11. David M. Kaplan, 2022. "Smoothed instrumental variables quantile regression," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 22(2), pages 379-403, June.
    12. Ruoyao Shi & Zhipeng Liao, 2018. "An Averaging GMM Estimator Robust to Misspecification," Working Papers 201803, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    13. Black, Dan A. & Joo, Joonhwi & LaLonde, Robert & Smith, Jeffrey A. & Taylor, Evan J., 2022. "Simple Tests for Selection: Learning More from Instrumental Variables," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Karthik Rajkumar, 2019. "Ridge regularization for Mean Squared Error Reduction in Regression with Weak Instruments," Papers 1904.08580, arXiv.org.
    15. Arthur Lewbel, 2019. "The Identification Zoo: Meanings of Identification in Econometrics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 57(4), pages 835-903, December.
    16. Paul Hunermund & Elias Bareinboim, 2019. "Causal Inference and Data Fusion in Econometrics," Papers 1912.09104, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    17. Boot, Tom, 2023. "Joint inference based on Stein-type averaging estimators in the linear regression model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1542-1563.
    18. Javier Alejo & Gabriel Montes-Rojas, 2021. "Quantile Regression under Limited Dependent Variable," Papers 2112.06822, arXiv.org.
    19. Tetsuya Kaji, 2021. "Theory of Weak Identification in Semiparametric Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(2), pages 733-763, March.
    20. Hao Hao & Bai Huang & Tae-Hwy Lee, 2022. "Model Averaging Estimation of Panel Data Models with Many Instruments and Boosting," Working Papers 202212, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bias; mean squared error; meta-analysis; optimal estimation; science;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:umc:wpaper:1911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chao Gu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edumous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.