IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact of organizational structure on nurses’ job satisfaction: A questionnaire survey








Background Nurses’ job satisfaction is an important issue because of its impact on the quality of the nursing job. Therefore, it receives a lot of attention in the international nursing literature but insight into the sources of nurses’ job satisfaction is yet insufficient, in particular for sources related to organizational structure. Objectives We contribute by investigating the relationship between the organizational structure variables, formalization, centralization and specialization, and nurses’ job satisfaction. This allows us to learn whether structural changes can help to improve satisfaction, and therefore nurses’ work quality. Design Data was collected by questionnaires in a random sample of 764 non-managing nurses in three Belgian general care hospitals. We measured satisfaction by Stamps and Piedmont’s work satisfaction index. Structure was also measured by an existing scale. Results The results showed the negative effect of centralization and the clearly positive effects of specialization and formalization on nurses’ job satisfaction. These effects differ according to the different dimensions of satisfaction. Furthermore, pay is the most important dimension of nurses job satisfaction but the dimension least influenced by organizational structure. Conclusions The importance of the dimension pay in nurses’ job satisfaction, which is not a function of organizational structure, is limiting hospitals in improving nurses’ job satisfaction. However, organizational structure does impact the other dimensions of satisfaction. Especially, the fact that specialization and formalization have, contrary to our hypotheses, only positive effects on satisfaction is important from a practice perspective and for further research. Furthermore, our data indicates that there is a need to refine one of the dimensions of Stamps and Piedmont index.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Willem & M. Buelens & I. De Jonghe, 2005. "Impact of organizational structure on nurses’ job satisfaction: A questionnaire survey," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/347, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:05/347

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Peterson, Robert A, 1994. " A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 381-391, September.
    2. Argyres, Nicholas S., 1995. "Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 337-358, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. S. Desmidt & A. Prinzie & A. Heene, 2007. "Is the mission statement dead or alive? The level and determinants of mission statement use amongst the nurses of three Flemish hospitals: a questionnaire survey," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/489, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Jenine A. Mitchell & Talia R. Esnard, 2014. "Socio-Economic Factors and Job Satisfaction among Public Health Care Registered Nurses in Trinidad and Tobago," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(6), pages 27-37, June.
    3. Alexi Danchev & Erkan Ilgün, 2013. "Job Performance, Job Satisfaction and Human Capital in the Labour Market in Bosnia," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 2(1), pages 25-44.

    More about this item


    hospital nurses; job satisfaction; organizational structure; survey;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:05/347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.