IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/psi/resdis/8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Union Effects on Workplace Governance 1983 -1998

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Bryson

    ()

Abstract

This paper addresses the question: what impact do trade unions have on workplace governance, and how has this changed during two decades of union decline? Using nationally representative data on employees in the British Social Attitudes Surveys (BSAS) 1983–1998, we assess associations between measures of unionisation and employee perceptions of three aspects of workplace governance: the employee relations climate; managers’ treatment of employees and unions; and managerial performance. The paper provides broad support for the three hypotheses explored in the paper. First, employees’ perceptions of workplace governance are better where there is a balance of power between unions and management at the workplace. Secondly, employees’ perceptions of workplace governance are better where management supports union membership, and are poorest where they actively discourage membership. Thirdly, employees’ perceptions of union effectiveness are positively associated with employees’ perceptions of good workplace governance. A further hypothesis, namely that perceptions of governance will have deteriorated since the 1980s in unionised workplaces due to the weaker position of unions in the workplace, and to declining support for unions among employers, was not supported. Perceptions of workplace governance had deteriorated since the 1980s. However, these trends were apparent among employees in unionised and non-unionised workplaces. There was no evidence to suggest that the trend was associated with a diminution in union power, managers’ changing attitudes to unions, or the perceived effectiveness of unions.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Bryson, 2001. "Union Effects on Workplace Governance 1983 -1998," PSI Research Discussion Series 8, Policy Studies Institute, UK.
  • Handle: RePEc:psi:resdis:8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.psi.org.uk/publications/Research%20Discussion%20Series/pdffiles/Research_Discussion_Paper_8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Bryson, 2000. "Have British Workers Lost their Voice, or Have they Gained a New One?," PSI Research Discussion Series 2, Policy Studies Institute, UK.
    2. Bryson, Alex & Wilkinson, David, 2002. "Collective bargaining and workplace performance: an investigation using the workplace employee relations survey 1998," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4995, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Addison, John T & Belfield, Clive R, 2000. "The Impact of Financial Participation and Employee Involvement on Financial Performance: A Re-estimation Using the 1998 WERS," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 47(5), pages 571-583, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alex Bryson & P Willman, 2007. "Union Organization in Great Britain," CEP Discussion Papers dp0774, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Willman, Paul & Bryson, Alex & Gomez, Rafael, 2003. "Why do voice regimes differ?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20017, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Alex Bryson & Rafael Gomez, 2005. "Why Have Workers Stopped Joining Unions? The Rise in Never-Membership in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(1), pages 67-92, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:psi:resdis:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rob Lyons). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/psiiiuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.