IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/58488.html

The Demand Driven and the Supply-Sided Input-Output Models. Notes for the debate

Author

Listed:
  • AROCHE REYES, FIDEL
  • MARQUEZ MENDOZA, MARCO ANTONIO

Abstract

The demand-driven version of the open Input-Output model determines production as a function of final demand, given the production technology. On the contrary, in the supply-sided version, value added determines output and producers must induce sales in order to achieve a desired level of income. This latter version of the model has been criticised and even rejected on the bases of its implausibility, its difficult interpretation and its bizarre implications. This paper argues however that the logic of the supply-side model is not mathematically at odds with Leontief’s arguments. Rejection of the model is a matter of theoretical interpretation

Suggested Citation

  • Aroche Reyes, Fidel & Marquez Mendoza, Marco Antonio, 2013. "The Demand Driven and the Supply-Sided Input-Output Models. Notes for the debate," MPRA Paper 58488, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jul 2014.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:58488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58488/2/MPRA_paper_58488.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hazari, Bharat R, 1970. "Empirical Identification of Key Sectors in the Indian Economy," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 52(3), pages 301-305, August.
    2. Louis De Mesnard, 2009. "Is The Ghosh Model Interesting?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 361-372, May.
    3. Miller,Ronald E. & Blair,Peter D., 2009. "Input-Output Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521517133.
    4. Miller,Ronald E. & Blair,Peter D., 2009. "Input-Output Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521739023.
    5. Bon, Ranko, 1986. "Comparative stability analysis of demand-side and supply-side input-output models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 231-235.
    6. Leroy P. Jones, 1976. "The Measurement of Hirschmanian Linkages," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(2), pages 323-333.
    7. Prem S. Laumas, 1976. "The Weighting Problem in Testing the Linkage Hypothesis," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(2), pages 308-312.
    8. F Giarratani, 1976. "Application of an Interindustry Supply Model to Energy Issues," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 8(4), pages 447-454, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Dongseok, 2021. "Measuring the Impact of a Trade Dispute with a Supply-side Shock Using a Supply-driven Input-Output Analysis: Korea-Japan Dispute Case," KDI Journal of Economic Policy, Korea Development Institute (KDI), vol. 43(1), pages 29-52.
    2. Juhyun Oh & Dong Hee Suh, 2019. "The Industrial Linkages and Supply Effects of the U.S. R&D Sector: Comparison with OECD Countries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, March.
    3. Pablo Aníbal Beltrán Romero & Santiago Estuardo Pozo Rodríguez & Patricio Cárdenas Jaramillo, 2017. "Effectiveness Of State-Driven Productive Reconversion: A Case Study Of The Shift On Production Matrix In Ecuador," Journal of Smart Economic Growth, , vol. 2(2), pages 83-103, September.
    4. Jungseok Choi & Woohyoung Kim & Seokkyu Choi, 2021. "The Economic Effects of China’s Distribution Industry: An Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fidel Aroche Reyes & Marco Antonio Marquez Mendoza, 2021. "Demand-Driven and Supply-Sided Input–Output Models," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(2), pages 251-267, June.
    2. Lenzen, Manfred, 2003. "Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the Australian economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, March.
    3. Matías Piaggio & Vicent Alcántara Escolano & Emilio Padilla, 2012. "Economic structure and key sectors analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in Uruguay," Working Papers wpdea1204, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    4. Breandán Ó. hUallacháin, 1984. "Input-Output Linkages and Foreign Direct Investment in Ireland," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 9(3), pages 185-200, December.
    5. Junning Cai & Pingsun Leung, 2004. "Linkage Measures: a Revisit and a Suggested Alternative," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 63-83.
    6. Ana-Isabel Guerra, 2011. "Merging the Hypothetical Extraction Method and the Classical Multiplier Approach: A Hybrid Possibility for Identifying Key Distributive Sectors," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 886.11, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    7. André Torre, 1993. "Sur la signification théorique du modèle d'offre multisectoriel," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(5), pages 951-970.
    8. Maurizio Ciaschini & Francesca Severini, 2010. "The Economic Impact of the Green Certificate Market through the Macro Multiplier Approach," Working Papers 2010.105, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Ferrari, Alessandro, 2019. "Global Value Chains and the Business Cycle," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 1908, CEPREMAP.
    10. Lach, Łukasz, 2022. "Optimization based structural decomposition analysis as a tool for supporting environmental policymaking," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    11. Arne J. Nagengast & Robert Stehrer, 2016. "Accounting for the Differences Between Gross and Value Added Trade Balances," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(9), pages 1276-1306, September.
    12. Lee, Frederic, 2011. "Old controversy revisited: pricing, market structure, and competition," MPRA Paper 30490, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. repec:ilo:ilowps:485511 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Garry Mcdonald, 2010. "A didactic Input-Output model for territorial ecology analyses," Working Papers hal-00911640, HAL.
    15. Paul S. Bustos, 2011. "Actividades económicas en Bolivia: un análisis de encadenamiento," Revista Latinoamericana de Desarrollo Economico, Carrera de Economía de la Universidad Católica Boliviana (UCB) "San Pablo", issue 16, pages 39-56.
    16. Kristinn Hermannsson, 2015. "Expenditure and Displacement effects of Students in the Periphery: Impact on the Scottish Highlands and Islands," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1601, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Moretto, Antonio Carlos & Rodrigues, Rossana Lott & Sesso Filho, Umberto Antonio & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Maia, Katy, 2012. "Regiões polarizadas no Paraná: relações inter setoriais e inter regionais em 2006," MPRA Paper 46996, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Usón, Sergio & Valero, Antonio & Agudelo, Andrés, 2012. "Thermoeconomics and Industrial Symbiosis. Effect of by-product integration in cost assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 43-51.
    19. Hagenaars, R.H. & Heijungs, R. & Tukker, A. & Wang, R., 2025. "Hybrid LCA for sustainable transitions: principles, applications, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    20. Torre Cepeda Leonardo E. & Chapa Cantú Joana C. & González González Eva Edith, 2020. "Economic Integration Mexico-United States and Regional Performance in Mexico," Working Papers 2020-06, Banco de México.
    21. Zhang, Bo & Chen, Z.M. & Xia, X.H. & Xu, X.Y. & Chen, Y.B., 2013. "The impact of domestic trade on China's regional energy uses: A multi-regional input–output modeling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1169-1181.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B23 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Econometrics; Quantitative and Mathematical Studies
    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:58488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.