The Italian Reform of the academic recruitment system: an appraisal of ANVUR and CUN benchmarks for assessing candidates and commissioners
The present study is aimed at contributing to the ongoing debate about the implications of the incoming recruitment system as proposed by Law 240/2010 (Gelmini's reform). For this purpose, the main implications of the two alternative criteria respectively proposed by the National Agency for the Evaluation of the University System and Research (ANVUR) and the National University Council (Consiglio Universitario Nazionale - CUN) are investigated for assessing candidates and commissioners admitted to apply for the national scientific approval of the Italian academic recruitment system. Using the sample of 1327 Italian academic economists (secs p/01, p/02, p/03) enrolled for the academic year 2011-12, the analysis provides two simulations. First, the thresholds for both ANVUR and CUN criteria as well as the resulting shares of "qualified" candidates and commissioners are computed. Second, the impact of the new eligibility criteria on the academic competitions (p01, p02, p03) that occurred in 2005 is simulated under the assumption that behavioral responses are absent. The findings suggest that (i) CUN criteria provide more selective benchmarks than ANVUR ones, and (ii) in the absence of behavioral responses, the new system of recruitment is expected to remarkably affect the profile of the Italian academic system.
|Date of creation:||2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Marcuzzo Maria Cristina & Zacchia Giulia, 2010. "Weight for citations or weights for numerousness? Evaluating Italy's academic economists," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 409.
- Burgos, Albert, 2010. "Ranking Scientists," UMUFAE Economics Working Papers 10609, DIGITUM. Universidad de Murcia.
- repec:rie:review:v:12:y:2007:i:2:n:10 is not listed on IDEAS
- Cainelli Giulio & de Felice Annunziata & Lamonarca Maria & Zoboli Roberto, 2006. "The Publications of Italian Economists in ECONLIT. Quantitative Assessment and Implications for Research Evaluation," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 385-424.
- Durante, Ruben & Labartino, Giovanna & Perotti, Roberto, 2011.
"Academic Dynasties: Decentralization and Familism in the Italian Academia,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
8645, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Ruben Durante & Giovanna Labartino & Roberto Perotti, 2011. "Academic Dynasties: Decentralization and Familism in the Italian Academia," NBER Working Papers 17572, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Bowles Samuel, 2007. "La valutazione della ricerca negli Stati Uniti: risultati di un questionario," Rivista italiana degli economisti, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 255-258.
- Bruno, Bruno, 2010. "Economics of co-authorship," MPRA Paper 27730, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Abatemarco, Antonio & Dell'Anno, Roberto, 2011. "Certainty equivalent citation: a generalized class of citation indexes," MPRA Paper 36367, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Sascha O. Becker & Andrea Ichino & Giovanni Peri, 2003.
"How Large is the "Brain Drain" from Italy?,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
839, CESifo Group Munich.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:38872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.