IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/por/obegef/005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who rules the ruler? On the misconduct of Journal Editors

Author

Listed:
  • Aurora A.C. Teixeira

    (CEF.UP; Faculdade de Economia do Porto; Universidade do Porto; INESC Porto; OBEGEF)

  • Mariana Fontes da Costa

    () (Faculdade de Economia do Porto; Universidade do Porto; CIJE; OBEGEF)

Abstract

There are very few (published) accounts of editorial misconduct, and those that do exist are almost exclusively focused on medicine-related areas. In the present article we detail a case of alleged editorial misconduct in a rather underexplored domain, the social sciences. We provide the facts, the viewpoint of a set of editors of journals in the areas of ethics and innovation, and a legal analysis of the case. Regarding this latter aspect, we discuss two main questions which arose from the situation under analysis: the boundaries of the authors’ right to decide whether and where to publish their works, and whether and when the publisher becomes legally bound to publish the work. This case demonstrates that although legal systems provide different instruments of protection to avoid, compensate for, and punish misconduct on the part of journal editors, the social and economic power unbalance between authors and publishers suggests the importance of alternative solutions before or instead of bringing a lawsuit to court. It then puts forward strong arguments in favour of the need for effective regulatory bodies (or to broaden the scope of the existing Committee on Publication Ethics, COPE), including representatives of both editors and researchers, so as to achieve and maintain a culture of research integrity by all involved in the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurora A.C. Teixeira & Mariana Fontes da Costa, 2010. "Who rules the ruler? On the misconduct of Journal Editors," OBEGEF Working Papers 005, OBEGEF - Observatório de Economia e Gestão de Fraude;OBEGEF Working Papers on Fraud and Corruption.
  • Handle: RePEc:por:obegef:005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fep.up.pt/repec/por/obegef/files/wp005.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Ben R., 2007. "Keeping plagiarism at bay--A salutary tale," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 905-911, September.
    2. Alan Collins & Guy Judge & Neil Rickman, 2007. "On the economics of plagiarism," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 93-107, October.
    3. Walter Enders & Gary Hoover, 2006. "Plagiarism in the Economics Profession: A Survey," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 92-107.
    4. Gary A. Hoover, 2004. "Whose Line Is It? Plagiarism in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(2), pages 487-493, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    scientifi c research; ethics; editorial misconduct; law; regulatory bodies;

    JEL classification:

    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
    • K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law
    • K12 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Contract Law
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:por:obegef:005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rui Henrique Alves). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.