IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Who rules the ruler? On the misconduct of Journal Editors

Listed author(s):
  • Aurora A.C. Teixeira

    (CEF.UP; Faculdade de Economia do Porto; Universidade do Porto; INESC Porto; OBEGEF)

  • Mariana Fontes da Costa


    (Faculdade de Economia do Porto; Universidade do Porto; CIJE; OBEGEF)

There are very few (published) accounts of editorial misconduct, and those that do exist are almost exclusively focused on medicine-related areas. In the present article we detail a case of alleged editorial misconduct in a rather underexplored domain, the social sciences. We provide the facts, the viewpoint of a set of editors of journals in the areas of ethics and innovation, and a legal analysis of the case. Regarding this latter aspect, we discuss two main questions which arose from the situation under analysis: the boundaries of the authors’ right to decide whether and where to publish their works, and whether and when the publisher becomes legally bound to publish the work. This case demonstrates that although legal systems provide different instruments of protection to avoid, compensate for, and punish misconduct on the part of journal editors, the social and economic power unbalance between authors and publishers suggests the importance of alternative solutions before or instead of bringing a lawsuit to court. It then puts forward strong arguments in favour of the need for effective regulatory bodies (or to broaden the scope of the existing Committee on Publication Ethics, COPE), including representatives of both editors and researchers, so as to achieve and maintain a culture of research integrity by all involved in the process.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by OBEGEF - Observatório de Economia e Gestão de Fraude & OBEGEF Working Papers on Fraud and Corruption in its series OBEGEF Working Papers with number 005.

in new window

Length: 28 pages
Date of creation: Apr 2010
Handle: RePEc:por:obegef:005
Contact details of provider:


Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200 PORTO

Phone: 351-22-5571100
Fax: 351-22-5505050
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Martin, Ben R., 2007. "Keeping plagiarism at bay--A salutary tale," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 905-911, September.
  2. Alan Collins & Guy Judge & Neil Rickman, 2007. "On the economics of plagiarism," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 93-107, October.
  3. Walter Enders & Gary Hoover, 2006. "Plagiarism in the Economics Profession: A Survey," Challenge, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 49(5), pages 92-107, October.
  4. Gary A. Hoover, 2004. "Whose Line Is It? Plagiarism in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(2), pages 487-493, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:por:obegef:005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rui Henrique Alves)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.