Kuznets’S Hypothesis And The Data Constraint
Five decades ago, Simon Kuznets expressed an important hypothesis about the relationship between the degree of income inequality within a country and its level of economic development: the Kuznets’s inverted-U hypothesis. The lack of longitudinal data has forced the use of cross-section or pooled datasets in order to draw conclusions about that relationship. In the present note we highlight the lack of international comparability of surveys where the measures of inequality are based, and we show two main findings: 1) data comparability goes on constituting a problem, particularly in what respects to the different welfare indicators used in national surveys, and 2) the procedure usually used to minimize the problem of noncomparability is likely to enforce the bias rather than to solve it.
|Date of creation:||Feb 2008|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.fep.up.pt/Email:
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:por:fepwps:267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.